Oystein
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- Dec 9, 2009
- Messages
- 18,941
I thought I heard/read they were also getting artillery with a greater range than the Russians are presently using against Ukraine.
A general word of caution:
What we hear may not be what's really important and decisive.
What we hear is definitely biased - one way or another.
What we hear may be untrue, or only partially true, or be presented without significant caveats and qualifiers.
For example:
We have NOT been hearing much about logistics problems lately, or have we? That was a huge issue in the early weeks - when Russia was struggling.
No, Russia is concentrating the fighting close to territory it controls tightly, and thus they enjoy short and relatively safe supplies and and supply routes.
On the other hand, Ukraine increasingly suffers disruption of logistics lines (Russia fires missiles at railroads, bridges all over the country), and also has very long supply lines - are we certain that Ukraine can move all that heavy gear, keep it fueled and stocked with the requisite kinds and numbers of ammo?
I am convinced Ukraine and her US/NATO intelligence supporters keep very quiet about the really important details of what is and isn't supplied and deployed.
[/standard disclaimer]
MORONS!