DIY experiment proving graviton is a particle

[philippeb8]

Can you?

That's exactly what I've shown in the aforementioned video.

Time is not a "dimension" but a form of energy.

 

[Steve]

That's exactly what I've shown in the aforementioned video.

So your "if" was unnecessary then. You have already done this? And your "investors" are chucking piles of money at you as we speak?

 

[Crossbow]

That's exactly what I've shown in the aforementioned video.

Time is not a "dimension" but a form of energy.

"And that, my liege, is how we know the world to be banana shaped."

 

[philippeb8]

"And that, my liege, is how we know the world to be banana shaped."

Yeah that easily explains the gravitational redshift where the photon loses energy but gains "time energy" thus speeds up.

 

[hecd2]

Yeah that easily explains the gravitational redshift where the photon loses energy but gains "time energy" thus speeds up.

You and Mike Helland should get together. Except I believe he thinks it slows down. I’m sure you’ll be able to work it out between you.

 

[philippeb8]

You and Mike Helland should get together. Except I believe he thinks it slows down. I’m sure you’ll be able to work it out between you.

Well gravitomagnetism really is s^-1 so it is inversely proportional to time. I still need to clarify that part but I'm just giving a hint of where Finite Theory is heading.

His work looks interesting though:
https://mikehelland.github.io/hubbles-law/

But Finite Theory already explains the expansion of the Universe.

 

[junkshop]

If you can manipulate time through gravitomagnetism (s^-1) then you can manipulate everything that has the time component in it such as speed (m/s) and acceleration (m/s^2).

I need to get back to work now.

This is a very interesting, and potentially paradigm-shifting area of study. I would suggest you talk to Childlike Empress, as they have achieved time travel in the Corona Virus Conspiracy Theories thread, and may be able to help you develop your ideas. I am informed that they have worked in science^TM, and are statistically the smartest person you will meet.

 

[philippeb8]

This is a very interesting, and potentially paradigm-shifting area of study. I would suggest you talk to Childlike Empress, as they have achieved time travel in the Corona Virus Conspiracy Theories thread, and may be able to help you develop your ideas. I am informed that they have worked in science^TM, and are statistically the smartest person you will meet.

Thanks I'll check them out this weekend.

 

[philippeb8]

Finally, a man who quite literally has nothing to lose!

That's what an underdog do.

So there are two choices left to the mainstream physicists now:

1) Hope the SuperString Theory magically patches all of GR's failures within less than 500 years from now;

2) Just learn that 1 + 1 = 2.

Anyway it's not even a choice at this point.

Like we say in computer science:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KISS_principle

 

[W.D.Clinger]

During my 10 years long debates I kept hearing from you guys how tensor calculus was difficult. Tensor calculus is just a fancy variant of linear algebra.

Some people, upon seeing the phrase "tensor calculus", might suspect it involves calculus as well as linear algebra.

Here is one of the simplest possible examples of tensor calculus being used to analyze a situation in which the mass density is not zero:

• FLRW solutions for a flat, expanding universe
• corrections, part 1
• corrections, part 2

 

[Marasmusine]

LIGOs dual detectors would have noticed Earth's "graviton shadow".

 

[philippeb8]

LIGOs dual detectors would have noticed Earth's "graviton shadow".

No because the measurements of the detectors are relative to each other whereas the measurements of the gravimeter are absolute.

 

[Marasmusine]

No because the measurements of the detectors are relative to each other whereas the measurements of the gravimeter are absolute.

But they would experience a change in the measured "gravitons" at a slightly different time as the Earth rotates.

 

[philippeb8]

But they would experience a change in the measured "gravitons" at a slightly different time as the Earth rotates.

So we're talking about 2 different experiments here where what you're referring to is similar to the ISS wavelength meter in motion I am proposing.

So yes I agree that when Ligo is perpendicular to the Sun (with the arm's distance of 4 km) then there can be a shift in wavelength of ratio of:

(G*5.9722e24/5500000^2/(G*1.98847e30/(1.495978707e11+4000)^2))/((G*5.9722e24/5500000^2)/(G*1.98847e30/1.495978707e11^2)) = 1.000000053476697

But the arms of Ligo will be perfectly aligned with the Sun thus there will not be any difference between the measurements.

If you make the measurements when the Ligo's lab is at noon or midnight then there can't be any shift in wavelength because there won't be any difference in the Sun's gravitational acceleration amplitude of the arms.

 

[Marasmusine]

But there's two LIGO labs at different places on the Earth's surface.

 

[philippeb8]

But there's two LIGO labs at different places on the Earth's surface.

They don't use the same laser either.

 

[tusenfem]

Well gravitomagnetism really is s^-1

Wow, this is "not evern wrong".
A whole theory is "s^-1" ??

 

[philippeb8]

Wow, this is "not evern wrong".
A whole theory is "s^-1" ??

Exactly. What was silently dismissed by mainstream physicists for the last century actually turns out to be the most important variable ever. You can call it a frequency (in Hertz) if you want.

Let's suppose you have:
B_g = 1 = 1^-1

And you have an increase in gravitomagnetic strength to:
B_g = 2 = .5^-1

That means that source of energy will speed up or slow down everything it travels through.

Furthermore given gravitomagnetism is dipole then that also means:
B_g = -2 = -.5^-1

Thus you can also reverse the speed of surrounding atoms.

If you can control time of surrounding objects that means you can create force fields, tractor beams, etc.

 

[Marasmusine]

They don't use the same laser either.

Isn't that the point? You look at the discrepancies between the measurements.

I'm looking at the Wikipedia article on Gravitons now, and it does say LIGO could potentially give some information on the properties of gravitons.

It also describes the difficulty in detecting even a single graviton, they would barely interact with matter. It doesn't look like using anything on the scale of the moon would help.

 

[philippeb8]

Isn't that the point? You look at the discrepancies between the measurements.

Maybe but I do not have access to their statistics and I already have to evidence I need with the tides anyways.

I'm looking at the Wikipedia article on Gravitons now, and it does say LIGO could potentially give some information on the properties of gravitons.

It also describes the difficulty in detecting even a single graviton, they would barely interact with matter. It doesn't look like using anything on the scale of the moon would help.

We can only induce the existence of gravitons I think.