philippeb8
Muse
- Joined
- Sep 23, 2018
- Messages
- 914
Sure you do. Your proposed experiment depends entirely on that claim. You really haven't thought this through, have you?
I talk purely about some Sagnac effect analogue.
Sure you do. Your proposed experiment depends entirely on that claim. You really haven't thought this through, have you?
You can't even come close to fixing your m=0 problem by changing one of your equals signs to an approximately equals sign.Ok whatever, you discovered I need to change a = for a ≈ and I thank you for that
Looking back over what you've written here today, I don't think the reputation of mainstream scientists is the reputation in need of restoration.but you keep capitalizing on that same relation in the hopes to silently dismiss everything else and in the hopes to restore the reputation of mainstream scientists and their dark matter, dark energy, wormholes and paradoxes.
Nor am I the only one who figured out that Phil Bouchard's paper/proposal is, at best, ludicrously inept.Finally I'm not the only one who figured out that mainstream science is a proven fraud:
I talk purely about some Sagnac effect analogue.
You can't even come close to fixing your m=0 problem by changing one of your equals signs to an approximately equals sign.
Here is a DIY experiment that should convince the mainstream gravity is a particle once and for all. Using the exact same parameters, you measure the sum of the gravitational attraction of the Moon and the Sun not aligned and aligned. There should be a slight offset if gravitons lose energy by traveling through the Moon, making them officially a particle.
That would put the nail in the spacetime curvature coffin once and for all. Next.
Is the mainstream convinced yet?
Not only I proved the theory of GR is nonsense already, the 3 experiment proposals will just confirm without any doubt my hypotheses.
This also confirms mainstream scientists will do everything they can not to put at risk their little reputation, proving mainstream science is indeed a fraud.
That does not answer my question.
I never say that.
Yes you do, if that isn’t what you are saying, why do you think the moon will block the sun’s gravity?
Finite Theory is valid because it only works (if ever) when m=0?Ok so you have exactly 0 valuable argument to bring to the table. That basically confirms the validity of Finite Theory. Thanks again!
Edited by zooterkin:<SNIP>
Edited for rule 0 and rule 12.
"None shall pass."Not only I proved the theory of GR is nonsense already, the 3 experiment proposals will just confirm without any doubt my hypotheses.
This also confirms mainstream scientists will do everything they can not to put at risk their little reputation, proving mainstream science is indeed a fraud.
Well yes, they ask for $500k to get it done.
Here's my crowdfunding campaign:
https://www.gofundme.com/f/help-us-make-science-fiction-a-reality
Am I? It's so hard to tell after you rewrote the last 60 years of it before moving on to rewrite the last 300 years of physics.
So there you go: the correlation coefficient is not exactly 1 so that confirms my graviton attenuation theory:
https://core.ac.uk/reader/42370604?utm_source=linkout
Well that is a lot of "hineininterpretieren", statistical methods are apparently not your forte.
Here is a DIY experiment that should convince the mainstream gravity is a particle once and for all. Using the exact same parameters, you measure the sum of the gravitational attraction of the Moon and the Sun not aligned and aligned. There should be a slight offset if gravitons lose energy by traveling through the Moon, making them officially a particle.
That would put the nail in the spacetime curvature coffin once and for all. Next.
Well that is a lot of "hineininterpretieren", statistical methods are apparently not your forte.
It would also cause satellites to fall out of the sky. You really haven't thought this through, have you?