• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Cont: Corona Virus Conspiracy Theories Part IV

Status
Not open for further replies.
carlitos said:
My cousin in Trinidad won’t get the vaccine cuz his friend got it & became impotent. His testicles became swollen. His friend was weeks away from getting married, now the girl called off the wedding. So just pray on it & make sure you’re comfortable with ur decision, not bullied
Click to expand...


Are you Nikki Minaj?

Or are you just some rando sociopath on the internet who thinks “vaccine” injuries are funny?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
michaelsuede said:
She was fired, which you would know if you listened to what she had to say. I hope you vaccinate your kids. Kids are at great risk from COVID.
Click to expand...


I hope they don’t “vaccinate” their kids, since the “vaccines”confer all risk and no benefit for kids (and probably everyone else).

I fully realize that you’re being sarcastic, but lets not blame kids for the mistakes of their parents, lest we end up like some of the pseudo-skeptics who cheerlead the deaths of people they don’t know.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Last edited:
michaelsuede said:
Those sources are pretty much garbage. The Stanford study was an RCT on the promotion of face masks, not an actual trial. All the epidemiology on it is junk science.
Click to expand...
Yes, this your claim, likely based on the propaganda you consume.
Masks are purely being pushed as a method of social control and virtue signaling. They offer no protection. They are a visible display of unity with other mass formation adherents, further reinforcing the collective.
Click to expand...

Nope.
 
Last edited:
Tippit said:
The modification occurred in the RNA that codes the protein. The protein isn’t the same as the protein coded by the virus that exists in the wild, as a result of the tampering with the RNA.

In addition the adenoviral vector vaccines are GMO as well, they use a genetically modified and deactivated pseudovirus to deliver a DNA payload which itself instructs cells to code modified spike proteins that don’t exist in nature.

The epitopes are similar enough that they produce antibodies, but how effective they are against different variants isn’t clear.

There are also a lot of toxic proteins that exist in nature which can produce different types of illness, from acute poisonings to causing cancers down the road. The modifications to the spike protein are presumed to be beneficial, but I don’t believe anyone really knows, because the long term hasn’t arrived yet. The intermediate term hasn’t even arrived yet.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Cutting out the pleonastic runaround, it sounds as if the spike protein is not what one could call "genetically modified," then.
 
sts60 said:
Maybe I should tell my sister that some layman on the Internet somewhere regurgitated a bunch of things he doesn’t understand.

My invitation to anti-vaxxers and anti-maskers stands.
Click to expand...

Yep.
 
Ha ha ha… Professional moron and antivaxxer (but I repeat myself) Candace Owens doesn’t believe in “the Moon landing in 1969”. Perfect.

Not surprisingly for an antivaxxer, she’s too ignorant to even be aware there was more than one lunar landing. Even just that year (1969).
 
sts60 said:
Ha ha ha… Professional moron and antivaxxer (but I repeat myself) Candace Owens doesn’t believe in “the Moon landing in 1969”. Perfect.

Not surprisingly for an antivaxxer, she’s too ignorant to even be aware there was more than one lunar landing. Even just that year (1969).
Click to expand...

Yeah, just saw that. Quite unsurprising. That of course doesn't mean that her bat **** views on COVID are therefore invalid; they're invalid because they're bat **** repetitions of debunked disinformation. We've seen that most of the disinformationists posting here also have other bat **** CT beliefs, likely due to the manipulative media they consume.
 
Last edited:
bruto said:
Cutting out the pleonastic runaround, it sounds as if the spike protein is not what one could call "genetically modified," then.
Click to expand...

Since the RNA that coded this protein was genetically modified and it wouldn't otherwise exist in nature, then it's safe to call it a genetically modified protein, even though a protein is just a chain of acids.

If I modelled a botulism protein in silico that was even more dangerous than the one produced by the bacteria in the wild, and then genetically modified some RNA that codes for this protein, would it not be fair to call it a genetically modified protein?
 
Last edited:
Pixel42 said:
The conservative estimate for the fraction of any particular adverse event reported to VAERS which are actually vaccine caused is zero. Last I heard the only one which had been shown to be non zero was the rare blood clot problem.
Click to expand...

If "one" reported adverse event was shown to be causal, then the fraction can't be zero, obviously.

https://openvaers.com/covid-data/mortality

Are you contending with a straight face, that for all the vaccine associated mortality depicted in this VAERS graph representing 22,193 dead people, that only one person's death was actually caused by the vaccine? These people presumably died in close temporal proximity to being vaccinated. Are all of these deaths just one big coincidence? Are you a coincidence theorist?
 
michaelsuede said:
Latest research indicates COVID is spread via aerosol transmission; which masks, other than proper respirators, do nothing to stop.
https://academic.oup.com/cid/advance-article/doi/10.1093/cid/ciab691/6343417?login=false
Click to expand...
You really don't read/understand much of your own references. I glanced at your laundry list and picked this one, as you claim it to be the "latest". Its publication date, though is irrelevant for the conclusion you erroneously made. Your logical fallacy is using this study to promote your claim that masks don't work when that very article says, "Our results support the calls for proper respiratory protection (ie, universal masking and N95, FFP3 respirators or equivalent for healthcare and frontline workers)".

As usual you just cherry-pick a small portion of science, while disregarding the other parts that contradict YOUR conclusions.

I may, at my discretion, review the other links, but this alone is sufficient evidence for highlighting your pronounced bias in selecting evidence.
 
Tippit said:
Are you Nikki Minaj?

Or are you just some rando sociopath on the internet who thinks “vaccine” injuries are funny?
Click to expand...

Or did you just make a false dilemma?

I'm actually a man who does body-double work in movies about Seal Team 6, and who plays a little classical cello in the Berlin Philharmonic. My 10K time is 52:27, and I float like a butterfly, sting like a bee.
 
michaelsuede said:
It doesn't take a rocket scientist to understand that respiratory viruses like COVID, flu, the common cold, etc.. which spread through aerosols are not stopped by a mask.
Click to expand...
No, because rocket scientists rarely make such ignorant conclusions, as it takes more intelligence/education than your false front has exhibited to understand, in some masks, the crucial roles triboelectric-materials and pedesis play in stopping aerosols. Actual science is very handy in figuring out solutions in innovative ways. More schooling on your part would help you with that realization.
 
I am a rocket scientist. Education helps, but a lot of otherwise intelligent people think they are experts outside their domain, and confidently apply zeroeth-order concepts of how things work in other areas without understanding how things actually work.

Of course, so do a lot of garden-variety idiots.
 
carlitos said:
Or did you just make a false dilemma?

I'm actually a man who does body-double work in movies about Seal Team 6, and who plays a little classical cello in the Berlin Philharmonic. My 10K time is 52:27, and I float like a butterfly, sting like a bee.
Click to expand...


So, rando sociopath who mocks people’s injuries it is.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
sts60 said:
I am a rocket scientist. Education helps, but a lot of otherwise intelligent people think they are experts outside their domain, and confidently apply zeroeth-order concepts of how things work in other areas without understanding how things actually work.

Of course, so do a lot of garden-variety idiots.
Click to expand...


There are also a lot of experts, and societies of experts, who are just liars and fraudsters, which is why I’m short expert credibility.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom