Cont: Corona Virus Conspiracy Theories Part IV

[eerok]

I claimed that the NWO exists, and is influencing virtually every substantial issue facing the modern world. It doesn't mean they're omnipotent, but it does mean that they're perpetually trying to set up a world in which they are.

If thoughts like this provide a context for your day-to-day life, you should get help. That is all.

 

[Resume]

I suppose that Tippit could be the exception is possible. That said, I've never encountered someone who believed the things he does who is not a failure in all the measurable areas of their life. No one who believes what he believes goes home to an upper middle class suburb, a loving spouse, 2.6 adoring children and a golden retriever. You end up believing in a New World Order keeping you down because you're not a genius, wealthy, super athlete.

One could argue that Alex Jones or Glenn Beck are successful, but then again, they know they're peddling bull **** to the likes of Tippit.

Selling credules bull **** is an enduring business model.

 

[welshdean]

I claimed that the NWO exists, and is influencing virtually every substantial issue facing the modern world. It doesn't mean they're omnipotent, but it does mean that they're perpetually trying to set up a world in which they are.

Riiight, ok then.
And it's us, not you that are 'living in fear'?

 

[Tippit]

The authors of the paper (see below link) had it peer reviewed. Within months of publishing paper on 3-28-2020 Robert Garry and Kristian Andersen received $8.9M in grants from NIH. There is a large story as to how this paper came to be but I am sure you all know it. Then as time went on, this paper got debunked.

Peer review is a scam, it's like George Carlin talking about Congress... "it's a big club and you ain't in it."

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32284615/

One need only review the long list of failed drugs and surgical procedures that are the targets of class action lawsuits to know that there is a massive problem with peer-reviewed "science". In lots of cases, the hypotheses being reviewed pass, but they fail the Hippocratic oath miserably.

 

[Resume]

One need only review the long list of failed drugs and surgical procedures that are the targets of class action lawsuits to know that there is a massive problem with peer-reviewed "science". In lots of cases, the hypotheses being reviewed pass, but they fail the Hippocratic oath miserably.

And one need only review the millions of successful medical science outcomes that debunk your disinformation.

 

[eerok]

One need only review the long list of failed drugs and surgical procedures that are the targets of class action lawsuits to know that there is a massive problem with peer-reviewed "science". In lots of cases, the hypotheses being reviewed pass, but they fail the Hippocratic oath miserably.

It's not hard to understand science if one's ego doesn't require it to be wrong. For example, in science, a proper, peer-reviewed paper is not guaranteed to be correct. It is merely considered appropriate for consideration -- no one actually tests the conclusions at this point. The true test of any peer-reviewed paper is what follows from it. This is why conspiracists and propagandists jump on those miscues and pratfalls and self-interested crapstands that lead nowhere.

 

[angrysoba]

There are a lot of effective treatments for Covid, as well as protocols that combine these treatments. Ivermectin is among the most effective, and so is the most vilified by those for whom “vaccine” revenue represents a huge windfall and for which the EUA poses a problem, and by those who have other agendas.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

This is obviously garbage.

Ivermectin has NOT been shown to be "Most effective" against Covid.

As for the EUA, try getting out of your American bubble and realize that there are countries all around the world that are using vaccines. Why? Think about it.

 

[MBDK]

It's not hard to understand science if one's enormous ego doesn't require it to be wrong. For example, in science, a proper, peer-reviewed paper is not guaranteed to be correct. It is merely considered appropriate for consideration -- no one actually tests the conclusions at this point. The true test of any peer-reviewed paper is what follows from it. This is why conspiracists and propagandists jump on those miscues and pratfalls and self-interested crapstands that lead nowhere.

Not to mention those papers (truly peer-reviewed and found acceptable) almost exclusively list their concerns and limitations with their own study/conclusions, as well as suggestions for further research to validate and/or expound upon their findings.

 

[Resume]

As for the EUA, try getting out of your American bubble and realize that there are countries all around the world that are using vaccines. Why? Think about it.

They're all in on it, this NWO that CT-ers bleat about, but can never quite demonstrate, though they assert with all the authority of Cartman.

 

[MBDK]

If it doesn’t generate revenue, “medical scientists” aren’t interested in it.

Yet still, the real world contradicts your delusions:

https://medicalxpress.com/news/2022...&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=daily-nwletter

 

[Steve]

One need only review the long list of failed drugs and surgical procedures that are the targets of class action lawsuits to know that there is a massive problem with peer-reviewed "science". In lots of cases, the hypotheses being reviewed pass, but they fail the Hippocratic oath miserably.

I would be interested seeing you provide a list of drugs subject to lawsuits that caused problems when used strictly in accordance with their FDA approval ie; "failed drugs". Do not include drugs that were subjects of lawsuits because they were promoted by pharmaceutical companies, and subsequently used, for purposes not approved by the FDA - these would not be "failed drugs". Fraud or misrepresentation by pharmaceutical companies does not impinge on the science behind development and proper use of drugs. Also, a list of successful lawsuits against actual surgical procedures, not individual doctors or poorly manufactured surgical devices, would be interesting.

 

[eerok]

Not to mention those papers (truly peer-reviewed and found acceptable) almost exclusively list their concerns and limitations with their own study/conclusions, as well as suggestions for further research to validate and/or expound upon their findings.

Also not to mention that certain self-interested parties misrepresent, cherry-pick, and outright lie about this stuff anyway.

One can follow the actual science, which is often slow, stuttered, and imperfect, but it gets there.

 

[angrysoba]

Tippit, maybe you should give your money to these grifters. That's what they are interested in. Taking money from gullible morons who buy into their snakeoil.

 

[Tippit]

Tippit, maybe you should give your money to these grifters. That's what they are interested in. Taking money from gullible morons who buy into their snakeoil.

Maybe you should get another booster.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[MBDK]

Maybe you should get another booster.

Maybe YOU should try to answer my questions.

There have, correspondingly, been lots of research that has been suppressed or ignored because it can’t be monetized, or because it doesn’t further some political agenda.

Evidence? Also, what is your answer to my earlier request for an actual example that shows your belief that the secrecy of compartmentalization is valid?

We both know you won't, because you can't, so I will accept your continued silence on this matter as your intellectual surrender (attempts to deflect are not considered valid replies, thus continuing your silence on the matter).

 

[eerok]

Maybe you should get another booster.

Maybe you should get another schtick. Vaccines save lives. Your BS makes people sick and dead.

 

[angrysoba]

Maybe you should get another booster.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I haven’t had a booster yet, but will when it is available.

What do YOU recommend for people who haven’t had Covid instead of vaccination?

Avoid catching it? Masking and isolation? Or are you against that too? Prophylactic ivermectin maybe?

What?

 

[Tippit]

I haven’t had a booster yet, but will when it is available.

What do YOU recommend for people who haven’t had Covid instead of vaccination?

Avoid catching it? Masking and isolation? Or are you against that too? Prophylactic ivermectin maybe?

What?

I recommend not living in fear, not getting jabbed, and using the FLCCC protocols when you get infected.

I wouldn't use prophylactic Ivermectin personally, but I would use it at the earliest onset of symptoms if I had some.

 

[eerok]

I recommend not living in fear, not getting jabbed, and using the FLCCC protocols when you get infected.

I wouldn't use prophylactic Ivermectin personally, but I would use it at the earliest onset of symptoms, if I felt I needed to, which I don't.

I recommend going with real science and rejecting quack BS. Get vaccinated and boostered, social distance as much as possible, and wear a mask in public.

 

[Resume]

I recommend not living in fear . . .

Yet you are terribly frightened and fearful of proven medical science, the NWO and a itty-bitty widdle needle.