• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Cont: Corona Virus Conspiracy Theories Part IV

Status
Not open for further replies.
Oh thank Odin...

I knew you'd put this fire out in a N Y minute.

Not so fast.
Firstly, it's quite clear (despite MBDK spoiling it!) that you hadn't actually checked this yourself. The next time you accuse someone of 'blindly parroting' what they've read somewhere, remember this: this is exactly what you did.

Next, the Epoch Times, your current source du jour claimed they had done an analysis of these figures, and come up with entirely different- and obviously wrong- figures and conclusions. Now, that analysis was not linked to in the article you posted, which means you didn't check that either and, even if you had, you didn't spot that it was complete *********. Are you now going to approach anything from that source with a considerable pinch of salt or, better yet, stop reading it altogether? If not, why not?

Finally, all of this data, whether from the Epoch Times' interpretation or not, comes from the CDC. Do you now accept the CDC as a reliable source of information? If not, why not?
 
Aaaah, Bubba, back and mentioning Zelenko again, I see.

Any chance you might get round to addressing certain points about this "honest doctor" and his awful (as in very bad indeed and not showing what you or he said it did - I went and actually read it) "research", which I asked about around 2 suspensions ago?
 
I think you're being too kind.
I personally think this conversation only happened in Bubba's head.

Of course, Bubba is perfectly free to get his 'doctor friend' to register on this forum, and then we can find out.
How about it, Bubba?

You beat me to it.

I'd love to read these claims from Bubba's "Dr. friend" himself.
 
I'm questioning the narrative. Kind of makes me the opposite of a sheeple, then, doesn't it? A wolfle, perhaps.
Anyway, I thought that's what you wanted, Bubba- people to ask questions and think for themselves?
When you reject an overwhelming scientific consensus, it means you're too smart to be fooled.

When you reject the scientifically contradicted claims of someone who's already been wrong about, well, everything, it means you're a sheep.
 
In case it escapes you, the take away here is not about the significance of the death rate spike (which is very significant)...The take home prize is that you heard it from me.

Your "sources" are hiding it from you, right now.

We also heard from you that Trump would be back in the White House by now.

How'd that go?
 
My doctor friend called me back.

Did you tell him we think he doesn't exist? If he keeps calling to talk to you about this, wouldn't he be interested in proving you, a friend, right, when others are calling you a liar?
 
What a rousing forum!
Just followed your link and noticed I was the only one there.

Yeah, it tends to taper off during the evening. Right now five are active.

About a dozen years ago there used to be a forum called the James Randi
Educational Foundation forum and it closed. The more liberal minded went
here. Conservatives wound up at the Skeptical Community Forum. And I
think the moderates went to Skeptics Society Forum, I recognize a few of
the names there. I don't know who went to the CFI Forum.

https://www.skepticalcommunity.mu.nu/
https://skepticforum.com
https://forum.centerforinquiry.org
 
My doctor friend called me back. He said yes, Mercola reported the death rate spike, and Mercola's articles are now available for only a day or two, before being archived, after he was attacked by Biden, (Zuckerberg, Dorsey, google,) for "disinformation"

No matter. Apparently Epoch Times picked it up. You might catch on if you dont double down in denial. Good luck with that.

BTW, you are so far down in the dark, regarding Mercola.!! When you learn the mortality rate spike is for real, and he was the first, or one of the first to post it, about a week ago, while your "sources" hid it from you (and still are hiding it right now)....maybe you will wake the F up.
All you need is Kevin Bacon and you'll really have something here.
 
more on Dr. Peter McCullough

In an earlier thread several of us discussed Dr. Peter McCullough (Wikipedia entry here). A portion of W.D. Clinger's comment #2309 follows: "After watching the interview and reading most of the other garbage my acquaintance wanted me to read, I replied to her email. She reacted pretty much as you have seen Caroline13 react. She believes Trump can do no wrong, but she believes the vaccines Trump is so proud of developing are a weapon of bioterrorism. She thinks of herself as an ultra-patriot, but insists the US government is lying about the incidence of COVID-19. She tells me Drs McCullough and Gold must know what they're talking about because Gold has academic degrees from the University of Chicago and Stanford, and McCullough is a professor at Baylor University and/or Texas A&M, but she dismisses everything I say because (as she puts it) I'm listening to professors instead of paying attention to what's happening in the real world."

I read a recent interview with Dr. MuCullough in the Epoch Times newspaper, in which he touted hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin, among other claims. This induced me to search for other information. I found a refutation of a podcast hosted by Joe Rogan, where he was interviewed for 2 hours and 45 minutes. According to the Health Feedback link I provided, Dr. McCullough is 1 for 18 regarding his claims. Reuters also fact checked this interview. Politifact looked into an earlier interview.

BTW, the last portion of comment #2309 above is another example of mutually contradictory anti-vax arguments being put forward.
EDT
Epoch Times is closely tied in with Falun Gong, according to an article in The Atlantic. IIUC Falun Gong has an anti-medicine bias. If someone else already linked to this article, I will say in advance that I was ninja'd.
 
Last edited:
When was the last time the usually stable death rate increased an unheard of 15-20% ? ...and why?

What the heck changed in 2021 that would cause overall mortality to jump by approximately 40%?

Through the 3rd quarter of 2021, (correct me if I'm wrong here) overall mortality has spiked about 40% in USA, on average. Apparently the trend continues in the 4th quarter, as those numbers are still in the pipeline.

My doctor friend told me about this. He said he heard that the majority of deaths in the uptick are not classified as covid 19 deaths. He had been telling me for months that doctors have been seeing increasing cases and deaths, across a range of non covid conditions. He said doctors are blaming the covid injections, in private only, for fear of being fired.

If correct, Texas and Nevada deaths are up roughly 50%-60%. In another state, hospitals are seeing dramatic spikes in deaths and hospitalizations for many non covid conditions, while the covid deaths are less than half the 2020 numbers. It seems puzzling.

You guys got any ideas on what could cause this to happen, suddenly, in 2021 ? What changed last year, ?

P.S.

I know you missed me. It's so mutual, and I've been looking forward to returning so you guys can explain this for me, since y'all are so well informed by your awesome sources.

This is a very odd statement here. Most of the conspiracy theorists have been denying the seriousness of Covid by saying the government is faking Covid statistics and attributing everything to it. Now, suddenly, we have the opposite! Now they're minimizing Covid deaths to conceal the real seriousness.

When do you suppose the change occurred? Or is the conspiracy so clever that Covid can be both nothing and everything at once?
 
This is a very odd statement here. Most of the conspiracy theorists have been denying the seriousness of Covid by saying the government is faking Covid statistics and attributing everything to it. Now, suddenly, we have the opposite! Now they're minimizing Covid deaths to conceal the real seriousness.

When do you suppose the change occurred? Or is the conspiracy so clever that Covid can be both nothing and everything at once?

The technical term for this is "flailing", and usually denotes a lack of focused rational ability. Less formally, it's known as "throwing crap at the wall to see what sticks."
 
This is a very odd statement here. Most of the conspiracy theorists have been denying the seriousness of Covid by saying the government is faking Covid statistics and attributing everything to it. Now, suddenly, we have the opposite! Now they're minimizing Covid deaths to conceal the real seriousness.

My take is that Bubba is implying that vaccinations are causing excess deaths while Covid-19, itself, is much less a problem. But I could be wrong. Bubba's comments generally lack detailed specificity.
 
This is a very odd statement here. Most of the conspiracy theorists have been denying the seriousness of Covid by saying the government is faking Covid statistics and attributing everything to it. Now, suddenly, we have the opposite! Now they're minimizing Covid deaths to conceal the real seriousness.

When do you suppose the change occurred? Or is the conspiracy so clever that Covid can be both nothing and everything at once?

This is the gist of Bubba's claim:

My doctor friend told me about this. He said he heard that the majority of deaths in the uptick are not classified as covid 19 deaths. He had been telling me for months that doctors have been seeing increasing cases and deaths, across a range of non covid conditions. He said doctors are blaming the covid injections, in private only, for fear of being fired.

So, he is saying, as is The Epoch Times, the vaccinations are causing the excess deaths. Of course that is patently false, as I proved earlier from their own source material (post #959).
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom