Merged A Thread for AlexPontik to Explain his Ideas

You test theories in reality.



Reality had to be made before you existed, and for this reason only reality is something else than what you imagine, until you make the entire reality again.



When your theory is close to reality, the results from the experiments of your theory are close to reality...but...



you didn't make an experiment that can make the entire reality...



until then, something else than what you imagine, is really happening.



No?
I can't say I understood that but it seemed like you were confirming my inference that you regard any experiment as a test of a theory of everything. I don't see why.
 
Edited by Agatha: 
Removed reference to previously moderated material


I get the "reality is going to be there whether or not it was predicted" angle, but I don't get why OP makes it exclusionary, as if it is required that reality be independent of prediction and observation. Seems like an unwarranted leap. We may not get every prediction precisely right (and you can argue that it is impossible to do so), but that doesn't mean reality is different. Just means our models are incomplete.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
In order for humans to come up with a theory that approximates reality, they imagine something, and then if after they spend time and effort thinking about it, still they imagine the same something, then they have to test it in reality with experiments…but…

1) When one imagines something, something else is happening around one in reality, or if you really think otherwise…

When one imagines something something else isn’t happening around one in reality, but if you think this is really ok…
Ah yes, the imprecise definition of words and playing games with them. Let's replace some of them.

When one imagines a 1958 imported left handed pencil created by blind penguins in the Royal Zoo in Johannesburg, South Africa, the migration of the wildebeest is happening around me.

No. I'm in my house, wildebeest free.

See how silly your idea is?

Perhaps you can talk to the attendant on duty to get your money back from the game you're trying to play.
 
In order for humans to come up with a theory that approximates reality, they imagine something, and then if after they spend time and effort thinking about it, still they imagine the same something, then they have to test it in reality with experiments…but…
False. I can imagine a unicorn. Do unicorns require experiments?

1) When one imagines something, something else is happening around one in reality, or if you really think otherwise…

When one imagines something something else isn’t happening around one in reality, but if you think this is really ok…

If in the end, when one imagines something, something else isn’t happening around one in reality, then it doesn’t seem to me where inside one really imagines something…does it seem to you?
Nope. I can imagine unicorns. Doesn't mean I think they are real, or that any investigation is warranted.

2)Here’s another way to understand it: Something else than anything humans can imagine seems to be happening in reality, since the beginning of humans in reality,

Or before humans existed, what do you think was really happening?

Something that was really happening before humans existed, but that humans had to really imagine after they existed, in order for that to be possible to really happen?
That is not how it works. That is not how anything works. In reality.

3)And another way: One step before you really make everything, you haven’t really made everything yet and still something else than anything you can imagine seems to be happening…

…one step after you really make everything, the experience of one step before has to be included in whatever you made as it was before, or …you didn’t make everything.
Gibberish.

4) and final way… Argument Physics as a science, progresses as follows:

1.There is a current theory, at any given time.

2.A candidate theory, which is more exact regarding what really is happening appears from research as a proposed new theory.

3.Experiments have to be conducted to verify the new theory.

4.When experiments are conducted, they can have the following results.

5.Nothing happens, the experiments fail to show any results, which has happened in the past, and this is what we said about it.

6.Something happens, the experiments had the expected results, which has happened in the past, this is what we said about it, and science keeps following its path

7.Something else happens…which was the case with some previous experiments…or else we wouldn’t be looking for a new theory, as then all experiments would point only to something, and nothing else…but up to now, this isn’t the case, and the future still hap pens next, and not before next happens.

8.What seems to be happening, is that before people actually make things in their lives that do something…they make things that don’t do something exactly…and they find that early at best, or late at worst…but the complete story they all know from the beginning, pretty consistently, it seems to me…as it could be the case with the argument I am making here and below.

And all the above in summary is

AXIOM: In any experiment conducted in reality, nothing can happen as a result, some thing can happen as a result, or…something else can happen as a result. This is an axiom that seems consistent and complete to me, and I dare say…logical. Isn’t it?
No. All of the above is you not understanding how science works.

Someone asked me the following in the past. “can I learn about my imagination from the world out there?” The world outside your imagination is something else than anything you can imagine,
Again, not how science works.

Your senses point you to that at any moment in your life, so that your body can be calm and be able to have fun in reality,
You mean the same senses that can point you to a disease or, say, a broken leg? You think those are fun?

And you can imagine whatever you like, even though reality is still something else than anything you can imagine.
Like unicorns. I can imagine them. But they are not real.

In order to experience that in the moment, meaning having fun in reality, you have to be able to focus on whatever it is that you are doing in the moment,
Like breaking your leg in reality. That's fun, right?

As at any moment in reality from the beginning of human history carrying on until now, the same laws of nature apply,
Sure.

and the story of human history plays as it make sense, people in the medieval ages used candles as this is what made sense to them, now we use electricity, not the other way around, that wouldn’t make sense to them in their moment in time.
Nope. Medieval people used candles because that was what was available at the time.

After you focus on whatever it is that you are doing in the moment, then you balance your imagination on what is good for you, what seems fun to you to imagine,
So if I imagine that breaking my leg is fun, it becomes fun?

And allow your senses to do their work,

So that what you imagine can have some hope at least to balance on reality, as reality is something else than anything you can imagine.
So if I imagine unicorns they become real?

Fear is natural, meaning as reality is something else than anything you can imagine, it is necessary for your senses to be able to generate fear to the conscious part of you, in varying degrees if that is really needed for your survival in the moment in reality , but…
Sure, fear is natural. Do you know why?

…it is also quite possible that you may be generating fear on your own in the moment in reality that is not really necessary, so…

…fear is natural, means you have to be able to accept the unknown in reality and let fear come to you when it is really needed, from the unknown as needed, and not as you only want.

And then you have to listen to the song. What song?
And now you have descended into some dubious philosophy.

In your life you slept yesterday you woke up today, and during your life you tell yourself fun stories, or you choose the other option consciously, to tell yourself not fun stories.
Baloney. Yesterday, I found my car had a flat tyre. I had to get down and dirty, get out the tools, jacks, wheel braces, etc. It was not fun, I did not imagine it, and it could not be imagined away because reality does not work that way.

No amount of thinking happy thoughts would make that go away.

Turns out to be a side wall perforation, which means a tyre replacement, not a puncture repair. That is an expense I could do without.

I can't imagine those away either. You think that was fun? No, that is reality.

Every story has an end and from the end of every story one learns something. The unpredictability of life one learns best at the end of funny stories, or else it wouldn’t really be that funny for life to be that unpredictable, is what the story seems to me to be.
I really don't care what anything seems like to you. I care what is actually true, not what anyone wishes were true.

<snip pointless youtube>
 
if you can't say that you understand, why do you pretend like you do?
I attempted to parse it for meaning but felt sufficiently uncertain that I felt it proper to warn that I was not confident I understood correctly. That seems like the opposite of pretending to understand.
 
I attempted to parse it for meaning but felt sufficiently uncertain that I felt it proper to warn that I was not confident I understood correctly. That seems like the opposite of pretending to understand.


you are attempting to jump into conclusion...

keep imagining stuff...

something else keeps happening around you in reality.

some day even you will get it
Edited by Agatha: 
Removed incivility
 
Last edited by a moderator:
No. If you can't express yourself coherently in writing I'm not really interested.

Dave

Dave do you really then have to spend time and effort replying to me,
Edited by Agatha: 
Removed incivility
 
Last edited by a moderator:
This suggests a topic for a separate thread: If you can't use language, how do you prove that you can think?

After you relax from your fantasies, what is the summary you have
Edited by Agatha: 
Removed incivility


Do your fantasies happen in reality?

Or does something else happen in reality
Edited by Agatha: 
Removed incivility
 
Last edited by a moderator:
In the planet with the cheeky monkeys, the cheeky monkeys are trying to find out what seems to be happening...

but what seems to be happening had to happen before the cheeky monkeys happened, and so what seems to be happening is something else than what the cheeky monkeys imagine, and they...


DIDN'T REALLY THINK ABOUT IT, did they really?!

...cause if they think about it, they will really understand.

...really.
 
Listen if you're gonna post gibberish you don't have to split it up into 5 posts 1 minute apart.
 
Unless this thread returns to a discernible topic, it will be closed.

Will you all be mindful of your MA, in particular rule 0. rule 11 and rule 12.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: Agatha
 
What I think is fundamentally wrong with Alex's starting point is the trichotomy of experiment, theory and reality. In fact, there is simply a dichotomy, because experiment is a subset of reality. We can therefore divide theories into those which thus far agree with reality, including experimental results, and those that have been shown not to. Alex is simply muddying the waters by pretending that experiments and reality are somehow distinct and unrelated.

Dave
 
Last edited:
Hi all,

I am posting the below text to discuss with any of you who wish to do so, for the rest ones, do you really have to spend time and effort replying to me?
Please keep in mind that you will need to read what I wrote more than once, patiently...
...And you need to think before you reply so that we don't have to spend more time and effort than we really do.
...cause do we really have to I ask you?

Text to be discussed
Prologue

When something makes sense, it makes sense to happen again and again in reality.

When something doesn’t make sense, it isn’t worth out time and effort…cause…

…do we REALLY HAVE TO?


Generally explained…

Imagine you do the same thing with the same amount of money twice from its beginning until its end , but one of the times that it takes you more time and effort.

Would you choose again and again to do it when it takes you more time and effort to do it with the same amount of money, doing the same thing?

For example…

Imagine you order take away from the same place many times, and lately it takes longer and longer for the food to arrive, and the food may start getting a bit cold…and it doesn’t seem to be getting better in the future, but the prices don’t change…

…do you start getting a feeling this might be a waste of your time and effort or not?

Or another way said….

What is it that people wasting others’ time and effort not understanding but that exactly?

And what is it that people using money…wasting others’ time and effort not understanding but what money does when money is used sensibly?

And in the end, what is it that people don’t understand , when they hear that they have to not waste others’ time and effort when they are using money, as …

Money has to not increase the time and effort for what it is used to do, when it is used sensibly.

Or yet another way said…

When people trade with one another,

In general they do “I do this for you, you do that for me”,

And specifically whatever “this” and “that” is for the specific occasion and instance, so now…

Player do you know what money does…

Money doesn’t do what those who have money say…

Money reduces the time and effort to trade…

Or we are stuck with idiots wasting our time and effort.

Have you ever really thought of that?


Main text


In Kennyshire and Bennyshire, people are playing with money.

Edited by Agatha: 
Trimmed for rule 4. This text about Kennyshire and Bennyshire can be found on several other places on the web, for example here: https://www.thestudentroom.co.uk/showthread.php?t=7114718



Epilogues - Clarifications

when the economy isn't working for the benefit of the general population, then you have to remember that the economists also say that the economy isn't working.


Why? Because either:

1.The economists are saying that the economy is working, when it is working for the benefit of the general population.

or...

2.The economists are saying that the economy is working, when it isn't working for the benefit of the general population.

but then...

3.I can easily imagine other people who claim that the economy is working, when it it working for the benefit of the general population and are willing to make sense of the economy this way, are followed by the general population (that has happened in economic history, you can search it online...), no?


When most in the economy say

When most in the economy say that the economy is fun for most, most care for the way the economy goes…to happen again and again, or if the economy goes another way…

When most in the economy say that the economy is fun for most, most don’t care for the way the economy goes…to happen again and again, but if this is the way the economy goes…

If in the end, when most in the economy say that the economy is fun for most, most don’t care for the way the economy goes…to happen again and again, then it doesn’t seem to me that most in the economy really want the way that is fun for most to happen again and again…does it seem to you?


When most in the economy say that the economy is fun for few only, whatever way the economy goes, it is a waste of time and effort for most if it happens again and again, and most want to do something else, or if the economy goes another way…

When most in the economy say that the economy if fun for few only, whatever way the economy goes, it is not a waste of time and effort for most if it happens again and again, or most don’t want to do something else, but if this is the way the economy goes…

If in the end, when most in the economy say that the economy if fun for few only, whatever way the economy goes, it is not a waste of time and effort for most if it happens again and again, or most don’t want to do something else, then it doesn’t seem to me that most in the economy really want the way that is fun not only for few but for most to happen again and again…does it seem to you?


When most in the economy say that the economy is fun for one only, whatever way the economy goes, most say it has to not happen again, and most want to do something about it, or if the economy goes another way…

When most in the economy say that the economy is fun for one only, whatever way the economy goes, most don’t say it has to not happen again, or most don’t want to do something about it, but if this is the way that the economy goes…

If in the end, when most in the economy say that the economy is fun for one only, whatever way the economy goes, most don’t say it has to not happen again, or most don’t want to do something about it, then it doesn’t seem to me that whatever one does isn’t fun for most…does it seem to you?


When few in the economy say

When few in the economy say what money is used to do for most in reality, most in the economy don’t think that money does whatever those who have money want money to do, or if this isn’t the case in the economy….

When few in the economy say what money is used to do for most in reality, most in the economy think that money does whatever those who have money want money to do, but if this is the case in the economy…

If in the end, when few in the economy say what money is used to do for most in reality, most in the economy think that money does whatever those who have money want to do, then it doesn’t seem to me what money does in reality has fun consequences for most in the economy…does it seem to you?


When few in the economy say what money is used to do for few in reality, most in the economy don’t want to spend time and effort thinking about that, or if this isn’t the case in the economy…

When few in the economy say what money is used to do for few in reality, most in the economy want to spend time and effort thinking about that, but if this is the case in the economy…

If in the end when few in the economy say what money is used to do for few in reality, most in the economy want to spend time and effort thinking about that, then it doesn’t seem to me that few aren’t wasting most ones’ time and effort in reality…does it seem to you?


When few in the economy say what money is used to do for one in reality, one can’t think of a fun way to spend less time and effort to do what that one wants to do than what few say, or if this isn’t the case in the economy…

When few in the economy say what money is used to do for one in reality, one can think of a fun way to spend less time and effort to do what that one wants to do than what few say, but if this is the case in the economy…

If in the end, when few in the economy say what money is used to do for one in reality, one can think of a fun way to spend less time and effort to do what that one wants to do than what few say, then it doesn’t seem to me that one has to spend time and effort with what few say, if most would think otherwise…does it seem to you?


When one in the economy says

When one in the economy says what one wants to do with money to most, most don’t care about what one says, or if this isn’t the case in the economy…

When one in the economy says what that one wants to do with money to most, most care about what one says, but if this is the case in the economy…

If in the end, when one in the economy says what that one wants to do with money to most, most care about what one says, then it doesn’t seem to me that one is wasting time and effort for most…does it seem to you?


When one in the economy says what that one wants to do with money to few ones, most can tell if that one can do what that one says, or if this isn’t the case in the economy…

When one in the economy says what that one wants to do with money to few ones, most can’t tell if that one can do what that one says, but if this is the case in the economy…

If in the end, when one in the economy says what that one wants to do with money to few ones, most can’t tell if that one can do what that one says, then it doesn’t seem to me that one isn’t wasting time and effort for few at least…does it seem to you?


When one in the economy says what that one wants to do with money to another one, that particular story and its consequences in reality don’t change later, or if this isn’t the case in the economy…

When one in the economy says what that one wants to do with money to another one, that particular story and its consequences in reality change later, but if this is the case in the economy…

If in the end, when one in the economy says what that one wants to do with money to another one, that particular story and its consequences in reality change later, then it doesn’t seems to me that one isn’t a waste of time and effort for another one for this particular story in reality…does it seem to you?


When no one in the economy has to say

When no one in the economy has to say what money does for everyone in reality, money reduces time and effort spend to trade in reality for everyone, or when that doesn’t happen in reality…

When no one in the economy has to say what money does for everyone in reality, money doesn’t reduce the time and effort spend to trade in reality for everyone, but if that does happen in reality…

If in the end, when no one in the economy has to say what money does for everyone in reality, money doesn’t reduce the time and effort spend to trade in reality for everyone, then it doesn’t seem to me that using money while trading isn’t a waste of time and effort for everyone…does it seem to you?


Some of you say that money is the store of value, medium of exchange, unit of account online (Wikipedia)…

Tell that to your girlfriend/spouse/mother in law after you give her money, and the way that you do it increases the time and effort she has to spend to have fun,

Is what I say to you, and also…

You think you are funny?

Nah, you ain’t funny yet.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FTAyNkwrPys


In the end, what’s the summary?

Nature is a lady…

Whatever we do with money, the way we do it has to not ignore the time and effort that we have to spend to do it, otherwise…

Whatever we do with money, the way we do it may ignore the time and effort that we have to spend to do it, but in this case…

If in the end, whatever we do with money, the way we do it may ignore the time and effort that we have to spend to do it, then it doesn’t seem to me that if we want to do whatever we do with money, again…and again…and…again…that we can continue to ignore the time and effort we have to spend to do it, and continue to really have fun, does it seem to you?


Justice is blind, and…

After girls, someplace sometime, have ended talking to one another and have together decided, they point out the ones who are not fun, and the rest show them how…


…MAMA in the end puts order.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Back
Top Bottom