RUST murder By accident? / Did NRA training Cause the Rust Accident?

Crazy Chainsaw

Philosopher
Crazy Chainsaw
Joined
Aug 12, 2006
Messages
8,339
If Alex Baldwin and witnesses are telling the truth that Alex never pulled the trigger, Alex is either,

(A) the Unluckyest man on earth.

(B) survivor of a Murder attempt on his life.

As evidence I give you this video.
The sticking Trigger malfunction can occur but it's about as likely as winning the powerball, It can be engineered into the revolver however.
Is this possible in this case or am I just being paranoid, because I know I could cause the gun to have that malfunction?

 
SuburbanTurkey said:
Hell yeah, this is the good stuff.
Click to expand...

Think about this a small piece of lead jamed into the trigger, holding it back, hammer pulled back, gun goes off lead falls out, lead missed by police Real murderer gets away. Now excuse me I have to go teach my Ex to shoot a Colt single action with Dummy bullets.;)
 
Crazy Chainsaw said:
Think about this a small piece of lead jamed into the trigger, holding it back, hammer pulled back, gun goes off lead falls out, lead missed by police Real murderer gets away. Now excuse me I have to go teach my Ex to shoot a Colt single action with Dummy bullets.;)
Click to expand...

I don't have any spare lead. Will bubble gum do?
 
bluesjnr said:
I don't have any spare lead. Will bubble gum do?
Click to expand...

Anything that will stick the trigger will work so yes you can even use a hot melt glue gun, but Bubble gum will not fall out like Lead will.

I was hoping you guys would debunk this.
 
Update, I checked the theory it works with my 1858 Remington, and didn't leave a mark on the brass frame.
 
Last edited:
Crazy Chainsaw said:
If the gun was rigged it could have killed Alex.
Click to expand...

How?

Did the script call for Alex to point the gun at his head and pull the trigger? Is that the scene the murderer expected them to be rehearsing that day?

How could the murderer even be sure nobody else would trip the mechanism before its time?

This has to be the most bizarre and unreliable murder plot outside of an off-brand Agatha Christie book.
 
Crazy Chainsaw said:
If Alex Baldwin and witnesses are telling the truth that Alex never pulled the trigger, Alex is either,

(A) the Unluckyest man on earth.

(B) survivor of a Murder attempt on his life.

As evidence I give you this video.
The sticking Trigger malfunction can occur but it's about as likely as winning the powerball, It can be engineered into the revolver however.
Is this possible in this case or am I just being paranoid, because I know I could cause the gun to have that malfunction?

Click to expand...

Crazy Chainsaw said:
If the gun was rigged it could have killed Alex.
Click to expand...

Who is this Alex Baldwin, anyway? Should I have heard of them?

:D
 
theprestige said:
How?

Did the script call for Alex to point the gun at his head and pull the trigger? Is that the scene the murderer expected them to be rehearsing that day?

How could the murderer even be sure nobody else would trip the mechanism before its time?

This has to be the most bizarre and unreliable murder plot outside of an off-brand Agatha Christie book.
Click to expand...

He knew Alex was working on his fast draw, he had just practiced with it, recently, and I am giving both Alex and the Armourer the benefit of the doubt in their public statements.
It hard to make a Murder look like an accident anyway you do it, and the intent might simply to be to Sabotage the production itself.
 
Crazy Chainsaw said:
He knew Alex was working on his fast draw, he had just practiced with it, recently, and I am giving both Alex and the Armourer the benefit of the doubt in their public statements.
It hard to make a Murder look like an accident anyway you do it, and the intent might simply to be to Sabotage the production itself.
Click to expand...

You're not claiming sabotage, though. You're claiming murder.

I can see giving Baldwin and the armorer the benefit of the doubt, as an interesting thought experiment in how else this could have happened.

But I think what you've successfully demonstrated with this experiment is that the alternatives are so bizarre and implausible that the best approach is to simply not give Baldwin and the armorer the benefit of the doubt.
 
theprestige said:
You're not claiming sabotage, though. You're claiming murder.

I can see giving Baldwin and the armorer the benefit of the doubt, as an interesting thought experiment in how else this could have happened.

But I think what you've successfully demonstrated with this experiment is that the alternatives are so bizarre and implausible that the best approach is to simply not give Baldwin and the armorer the benefit of the doubt.
Click to expand...

It's innocent until proven Guilty, or atleast it used to be.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom