• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Terror attack in Wisconsin

The perp here looks awfully light. Where I grew up, we'd take him for a Basque sheepherder or a Greek or some such. If he hates whites, he hates a (pretty large) part of himself.

Nothing unusual in seif-hate, of course, and not just among Mischlings. But our resident racies, open and thinly veiled, must consider that this joker inherits a helluva lot of Whight Manner genes and the traits that supposedly go with them. Traits that our racialists must surely share!

Could those traits include criminality, violence, and a yearning for genocide? "The Aryan hates his enemy and wishes to kill him." Who said that? Some advanced philosopher, I suppose.

I have a theory about inbreeding being the bane of American Blacks:

The White Slave Owner has sex/children with his slaves. Next generation, WSO jr., more sex/children with the descendant his father. Next, WSO III, ditto. etc. SO, IF there is a genetic defect in American Blacks, it's because of the "English" genes !!!
 
No, they're proposing killing all the violent people. Are you going to tell me that most of the violent people are black?
I'm saying that it would be wrong to fail to acknowledge that there is a strong link between crime, poverty, and the historical treatment of African-Americans. I'm pretty sure that Skeptic Tank would be just fine with killing white people too, but blanket executions of violent offenders would disproportionately affect poor black people.

Of course, this is only the beginning of the problems with Skeptic Tank's proposal. We haven't even talked about his definition of "violent offender". If I get involved in a punch-up outside the pub on Friday night, am I now headed for the chopping block?
 
Go to hell with that ****.

Tell that to Kevin Stitt

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/apr/22/oklahoma-law-protesters-drivers
"A new Oklahoma law protects drivers who unintentionally injure or kill demonstrators from any liability, while simultaneously subjecting protesters who block roadways to jail time and hefty fines.

Oklahoma’s Republican governor, Kevin Stitt, signed HB 1674 on Wednesday, even as advocates excoriated their elected officials for undermining democracy."



and Ron DeSantis

https://slate.com/business/2021/04/drivers-hit-protesters-laws-florida-oklahoma-republicans.html

On Monday, Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis signed an “anti-riot” bill that allows harsher police crackdowns on demonstrators Most jarring of all, the law grants civil immunity to drivers who ram into protesting crowds and even injure or kill participants, if they claim the protests made them concerned for their own well-being in the moment.
 
Last edited:
Tell that to Kevin Stitt

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/apr/22/oklahoma-law-protesters-drivers
"A new Oklahoma law protects drivers who unintentionally injure or kill demonstrators from any liability, while simultaneously subjecting protesters who block roadways to jail time and hefty fines.

Oklahoma’s Republican governor, Kevin Stitt, signed HB 1674 on Wednesday, even as advocates excoriated their elected officials for undermining democracy."



and Ron DeSantis

https://slate.com/business/2021/04/drivers-hit-protesters-laws-florida-oklahoma-republicans.html

On Monday, Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis signed an “anti-riot” bill that allows harsher police crackdowns on demonstrators Most jarring of all, the law grants civil immunity to drivers who ram into protesting crowds and even injure or kill participants, if they claim the protests made them concerned for their own well-being in the moment.

Good ol’ America, where rights and freedoms are paramount, as long as your politics are the same as the local dictator governor. We do have posters here who think that the quoted laws are acceptable and just.
 
Yeah, because plowing through a group of "Dancing Grannies" and schoolchildren during a city sanctioned Christmas parade is exactly the same as trying to escape an angry mob illegally blocking a roadway.

******* retarded.
 
Equity solution

Oh yes, that's a shining example of civilization in action! Truly something to aspire to.

Like I said, in America there is a strong overlap between the three groups, and it would absolutely be millions of people.

He's advocating for a massive expansion of the death penalty and the removal of all precautions and procedures that ensure that it is only ever applied appropriately*. And doing so for reasons that are literally mediaeval.


*Not that such a thing is possible, but for the sake of argument...

No, I'm pretty sure he'll be okay with killing white people too. It's just that such a policy would disproportionally affect poor black people because of the overlap.



Perhaps seeking equitable consequences could enhance ISF consensus around this vexing skeptic dilemma

Example:

a.) Determine a "unit value" for measuring the social/human cost of a crime, like, say, stealing a loaf of bread.

b.) Assign a corresponding "consequence/punishment unit value".

c.) Write a formula for applying that 'social cost' to, say, stealing a home via mortgage fraud, or stealing a nation's future via treaty fraud, or just select the most common white collar crime.

d.) Assign consequences equitably regardless of color or class (emphasis on class, as they come in all colors).
 
Regarding Tribalism

Robert Wright sent out an interesting newsletter the other day.

A surprising judgment is rendered near the end of the New York Times’s 25-minute video reconstruction of the Kyle Rittenhouse shootings. It’s a judgment about Anthony Huber, the 26-year-old who rushed Rittenhouse, hit him with a skateboard, tried to take away his gun, and got fatally shot in the process.

The judgment comes from a guy named Ryan Balch, who was in Kenosha that night. He says, “Anthony Huber, man, he went down like a hero… He thought there was a threat there, and he was reacting to it.”

I call this judgment surprising not because it strikes me as unreasonable...
What’s surprising is that the person who rendered that judgment wasn’t in Huber’s tribe. On the night of the shootings, Ryan Balch, a young military veteran, was out patrolling Kenosha’s streets, assault rifle in hand, literally shoulder to shoulder with Kyle Rittenhouse.

I'd go the other way in condemning the vigilantism of Rittenhouse and the people who tried to stop him. Then there's some evolutionary psychology:

The first rule of coalitions is: Make sure there’s one you’re part of. The second rule is: Once you’re part of one, avoid jeopardizing your status as a member in good standing. It makes sense that natural selection would leave us with genes that encourage compliance with these rules.
 
Good ol’ America, where rights and freedoms are paramount, as long as your politics are the same as the local dictator governor. We do have posters here who think that the quoted laws are acceptable and just.

Yup, as long as the people doing the protesting are BLM and/or Antifa, and the people doing the running down of protesters are white.

Heaven help a black man who runs down participants in a Proud Boys/Aryan Nations/KKK rally/protest in Florida or Oklahoma... he'll get the death sentence before he even gets to court.
 
Heaven help a black man who runs down participants in a Proud Boys/Aryan Nations/KKK rally/protest in Florida or Oklahoma... he'll get the death sentence before he even gets to court.

Can you share more of this make believe world in your head? It sounds like quite a fascinating place.
 
Last edited:
Yeah, because plowing through a group of "Dancing Grannies" and schoolchildren during a city sanctioned Christmas parade is exactly the same as trying to escape an angry mob illegally blocking a roadway.

******* retarded.

Um, well the "trying to escape an angry mob" is nothing that has happened or been reasonably discussed, so I don't see the relevance. But as mentioned there's been an attempt to make it OK to run over groups of people blocking the road. Personally, I think that "I'm inconvenienced and I don't like those people" is never, ever a reasonable excuse for vehicular assault/homicide, but if this had been a BLM march and the driver was an angry white guy, pretty sure we'd be hearing a lot of "good people on both sides" type comments. So, just want to sanity check what the position on running people over actually is.
 
But as mentioned there's been an attempt to make it OK to run over groups of people blocking the road.

No there hasn't.

Personally, I think that "I'm inconvenienced and I don't like those people" is never, ever a reasonable excuse for vehicular assault/homicide

Neither does anyone else.

but if this had been a BLM march and the driver was an angry white guy, pretty sure we'd be hearing a lot of "good people on both sides" type comments.

You're "pretty sure", huh? Cool story, bro.

So, just want to sanity check what the position on running people over actually is.

Seems like you're way off. I mean like way, way off. Not even remotely in the ballpark of what anyone thinks.
 
Wow. 6 dead white victims, including a child. And a black man with racist rants on his social media. Imagine if the colors had been reversed. A "white supremacist" hate crime is all you would be hearing.


If the races were reversed, he'd be the new Dylan Roof and left-wingers would not shut up about it for the next five years. I'm guessing they would be pissing and moaning because the police provided him with food as they are legally obligated to do.
 
Wow. 6 dead white victims, including a child. And a black man with racist rants on his social media. Imagine if the colors had been reversed. A "white supremacist" hate crime is all you would be hearing.

https://www.foxnews.com/us/darrell-brooks-facebook-white-people-violence

And of course you would also hear, "no black man would have been let out on bail like that".


The 'reporters' at the 'Daily Fail' have got you covered, they've scoured the internet until they found...


A Black Lives Matter activist has claimed the Waukesha Christmas parade attack which killed five people was linked to the acquittal of teenager Kyle Rittenhouse.

Activist Vaun Mayes speculated that the attack which saw suspect Darrell Brooks Jr, 39, drive a car into a crowd of parade goers in Wisconsin on Sunday was the 'start of a revolution'.

Mayes claimed that the horror that unfolded during the Christmas parade was linked to growing anger over the verdict in the Rittenhouse trial, which saw the teenager acquitted on charges stemming from killing two men and wounding another during the unrest that followed the shooting of a Black man by a white police officer.


https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...ttenhouse-verdict.html?ito=video_player_click
 
Wow. 6 dead white victims, including a child. And a black man with racist rants on his social media. Imagine if the colors had been reversed. A "white supremacist" hate crime is all you would be hearing.

https://www.foxnews.com/us/darrell-brooks-facebook-white-people-violence

And of course you would also hear, "no black man would have been let out on bail like that".

The 'reporters' at the 'Daily Fail' have got you covered, they've scoured the internet until they found...

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...ttenhouse-verdict.html?ito=video_player_click

If the races were reversed, nobody would need to "scour" the internet. No doubt about that.
 
Last edited:
I'm beginning to think this was no accident:
Brooks, 39, of Milwaukee, had left the site of the domestic disturbance before officers arrived, and was not being chased by police at the time of the crash, according to the chief, who gave no further details on the dispute.

Police said they were drawing up five charges of intentional homicide against Brooks.

He has been charged with crimes 16 times since 1999 and had two outstanding cases against him at the time of the parade disaster — including one in which he was accused of deliberately running down a woman with his vehicle.
 
I mean blocking the roadway without a permit seems like something that should have hefty fines and jail time already.

Yeah. Protests should be illegal. Protests should be suppressed using any means. Stalin managed it, it worked for him. So the rest of us all can, right? Suppress those noisy folks, just as the party says, right?

Or are you an apologist for all that soviet oppression and gulags? You think that is the correct way right?
 

Back
Top Bottom