• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Why did China commit 8000 PLA soldiers as UN Peacekeepers?

Tippit

Unregistered
Tippit
Joined
Aug 1, 2007
Messages
4,038
Location
Florida
I don't post much on the conspiracy sub, but since I'm a conspiracy theorist, and the mods would have probably moved it anyway, here goes.

The United Nations is a globalist, New World Order foundation of unelected technocrats serving the wealthiest bankers in the world, ever since it's founding. A couple years later on October 20th, 1947 John D. Rockefeller Jr., the son of one of the wealthiest men in one of the wealthiest families in the world, cut a check for $8.5 million dollars to the first UN Secretary General, Trygve Lie for the UN HQ in New York.

Fast forward to about 2017 when Xi Jinping followed through with his 2015 commitment to provide 8000 Chinese PLA soldiers as UN "Peacekeepers", as well as a fund with $1B USD.

$1B USD is chump change for bankers who control the world's central banks, which can create unlimited fiat money in any currency they wish, but 8000 UN Peacekeepers is a substantial force which is apparently being used in Africa currently to police China's substantial economic interests on that continent.

Why would a presumably western dominated supra-national body like the United Nations allow the totalitarian Chinese regime run by Xi Jinping to command 8000 troops wearing UN blue helmets policing around the globe, while simultaneously lessening their own influence (as the article above documents) over the United Nations at the same time? Probably for the same reason that the WHO elected former Ethiopian communist of the "Tigray People's Liberation Front" president in 2017, and who was subsequently in charge of the "investigation" into China's level 4 bioweapons lab in Wuhan concerning the origin of Covid-19, I'm guessing.

Does the United Nations represent the west, or does it represent the same bankers who funded the Communist Bolshevik Revolution and the Communist Chinese color revolution?

The evidence is stacking up towards the latter, "skeptics".

Here is a youtuber commenting on an interesting video undoubtedly featuring some of these 8000 "Peacekeepers" at the 2019 "Wuhan Military Games" as well as some interesting symbolism:



Take care to note the reference at the beginning of the video to the "Lucis Trust", an organization founded by H.P. Blavatsky which also happens to be a United Nation's NGO.
 
Last edited:
Even my conspiracy theory about the UN is better and more realistic than yours. But we don't even need that. It suffices to say that the PRC is a voting member of the United Nations Security Council. The UN does whatever they want it to do.
 
theprestige said:
Even my conspiracy theory about the UN is better and more realistic than yours. But we don't even need that. It suffices to say that the PRC is a voting member of the United Nations Security Council. The UN does whatever they want it to do.
Click to expand...

Huh? How does the fact that China is on the SC cause the UN to do whatever China wants it to do, unless you suppose the votes of the other 14 countries represent the same bankers who founded it, and China's agenda is their agenda?
 
Last edited:
Why shouldn't China do some of the peace keeping?

They can start with Cyprus, talk about a boring gig.
 
Because when you're China if you want to impact something the one thing you always have to throw at a problem is humans.
 
China has been on the UN Security Council since [checks notes] 1945. It was one of the founding members of the UN and has a permanent seat on the council.

China has been trying to step into "Super Power" mode by committing money and troops to the UN...which it should have been doing all along.

I don't trust China but there is plenty of sneaky skulduggery going on with them without this CT.
 
Axxman300 said:
China has been on the UN Security Council since [checks notes] 1945. It was one of the founding members of the UN and has a permanent seat on the council.

China has been trying to step into "Super Power" mode by committing money and troops to the UN...which it should have been doing all along.

I don't trust China but there is plenty of sneaky skulduggery going on with them without this CT.
Click to expand...

Sure. The questions are, why did the SC ostensibly vote to give them 8000 soldiers to throw around the globe, and why did the WHO vote in an Ethiopian communist who was literally from a group that was designated a terrorist organization by the US?

The 8000 soldiers are an escalation. Eyebrows would be raised if the actual PLA were deployed globally, this is an exception.
 
China is a totalitarian communist regime, which clearly has designs on a neo-colonialism in Africa. The disturbing question is, why the **** would the UN, which purportedly represents interests in the west allow this to happen?

The answer, is that the UN is and always has been run by totalitarian communist bankers from the west - the same ones that founded it, and the same ones who, with Wall Street, exported the US manufacturing base, military secrets, corporate intellectual property, and capital to China.
 
Tippit said:
Sure. The questions are, why did the SC ostensibly vote to give them 8000 soldiers to throw around the globe, and why did the WHO vote in an Ethiopian communist who was literally from a group that was designated a terrorist organization by the US?

The 8000 soldiers are an escalation. Eyebrows would be raised if the actual PLA were deployed globally, this is an exception.
Click to expand...

First, a PLA Army Division is around 12,000 soldiers. 8,000 spread around the global hell-holes is not a force to be reckoned with. Ethiopia has 6,000 troops wearing blue helmets. The UN has 95,000 peacekeepers total.

The United States currently has 30 UN peacekeepers. Plus we owe a bunch of money because former President Clownstick refused to pay up.

Quiet simply put, the US has stepped on its wee-wee creating a vacuum that China has slid into because they have the cash and are looking for political credibility on a global scale.
 
the further away from their own territory an active national UN Peacekeeper force is, the better in terms of not upsetting the global power balance.
If the US would do their part for the UN they wouldn't have to complain that others are doing theirs.
 
Tippit said:
They should start wherever you live. Let me know how that works out for you.
Click to expand...

Why would we need UN peace keepers?

If the Chinese send some out we can have some of our own troops back again.

South Sudan, Somalia, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Mali and Cyprus.

All together there are over 70,000 military and 9000 police deployed as UN peacekeepers.

That China wants to contribute 8000 is hardly huge.

https://peacekeeping.un.org/en/military

https://peacekeeping.un.org/en/un-police

https://peacekeeping.un.org/en/where-we-operate
 
Last edited:
Tippit said:
Does the United Nations represent the west,
Click to expand...

Of course not. It represents its members the vast majority of which are not in the 'West'. As a major UN member why on Earth would China not contribute peacekeepers? If they weren't you would be moaning that they weren't doing their bit and just getting handouts from the UN.
 
I’m glad Memorial Day is tomorrow, I can visit friends and get a nice grilled burger. These CT nothingburgers are pretty sad.
 
Perhaps a better question would be:

Why did the USA commit 97,000 American soldiers as UN Peacekeepers?

The United Nations is a globalist, New World Order foundation of unelected technocrats serving the wealthiest bankers in the world, ever since it's founding. A couple years later on October 20th, 1947 John D. Rockefeller Jr., the son of one of the wealthiest men in one of the wealthiest families in the world, cut a check for $8.5 million dollars to the first UN Secretary General, Trygve Lie for the UN HQ in New York.

Etc.

Get a new song, guy.
 
Captain_Swoop said:
Why would we need UN peace keepers?

If the Chinese send some out we can have some of our own troops back again.

South Sudan, Somalia, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Mali and Cyprus.
Click to expand...

Further on this, the British army has only 286 troops, 5 police officers and no military advisors, as well little military equipment deployed with UN forces. This places the UK 50th amongst peacekeeping contributors

Fiji provides more than double the personnel that the UK does
China currently gives 2,183 personnel.

The UK has recently announced plans to nearly double this contribution with a deployment of 370 troops to Somalia and South Sudan but it is still a relatively small contribution.

However, the UK is the country responsible for drafting resolutions on peacekeeping, the protection of civilians, the Women, Peace and Security Agenda and country-cases such as Somalia, Darfur and Cyprus.

In addition the fifth largest financial contributor to peace keeping missions.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom