Filippo Lippi
Philosopher
- Joined
- Nov 28, 2002
- Messages
- 5,354
They’ll just have to unhook to charge.
Oh, the humanity!
They’ll just have to unhook to charge.
Oh, the humanity!
Fast DC chargers have cables about an inch and a half in diameter with coolant running through them. So,.extension cords aren't practical.
And most charging spots are standard parking spaces. A truck with a trailer wouldn't fit.
I suspect some charging locations in the future will look more like gas stations with charging lanes so vehicles can pull up beside the charging stations. But, most will remain as individual parking spaces that are easier and cheaper to set up without taking up too much space.
We tow a 21’ travel trailer with a Ford Flex. With sway control and weight distribution “unhooking” is a multi-step, time consuming affair.
[qimg]https://live.staticflickr.com/2809/34074689172_59dc5f94e7_z.jpg[/qimg]
Made worse in inclement weather or extreme heat or cold. It could probably be streamlined, but having to go through the process every couple of hours to charge would be a nontrivial inconvenience.
Given here there are fewer and fewer houses with off street parking, are we talking loads of extension cords and stuff?
I'm not going to act like it's not an inconvenience, which it is absolutely when compared with not having to spend an extra 5 minutes doing something, but it takes like 5 minutes.
I am wondering if any charging stations where designed with someone towing a trailer in mind, as if parking at or even getting to a charging station while towing a long trailer is going to really be as easy or even possible as Ford is thinking.
I'm not sure what made you think that either Bruto or I were referring to some sort of standard hand tool type extension.
If electric vehicles are to become ubiquitous then these sorts of issues will be addressed.
....'
ETA: Then again, trucks are really popular in this country, and plenty of people buy them and only rarely actually use them for heavy payload or towing work. Pickup trucks are as much status symbols and cultural identity as they are practical working vehicles by my estimation.
....
Symptoms of the culture war are everywhere in the US.Not to digress too far, but why is that? An F150 can cost upwards of $40,000. If you've [...snipped...]
Not to digress too far, but why is that? An F150 can cost upwards of $40,000. If you've got 40 grand to spend on a vehicle, why is a truck -- big, hard to park, gas guzzling, not very comfortable -- preferable to and more prestigious than one of the many other vehicles in that price range? There might be a lot of reasons to choose an SUV over a traditional sedan or wagon, and that's why they have become such a big share of the market. But I don't understand the appeal of a giant truck unless you actually need it.
There also a (mis?)conception in the US that trucks (and SUVs) are safer than cars. That probably contributes to their higher sales.
That's generally correct when a heavy vehicle hits a lighter vehicle. It's just physics. But that's not the only or even most common kind of accident. For others, the design and safety features of the vehicle itself can be more important. And a smaller, more maneuverable vehicle might be able to evade an accident that a truck can't.
https://www.iihs.org/topics/vehicle-size-and-weight
https://www.cars.com/articles/size-matters-when-crash-safety-is-involved-iihs-crash-report-422265/
Cars have to meet higher safety standards, so I assumed they are safer. But, I wasn't sure so I added the question mark.
Not to digress too far, but why is that? An F150 can cost upwards of $40,000. If you've got 40 grand to spend on a vehicle, why is a truck -- big, hard to park, gas guzzling, not very comfortable -- preferable to and more prestigious than one of the many other vehicles in that price range? There might be a lot of reasons to choose an SUV over a traditional sedan or wagon, and that's why they have become such a big share of the market. But I don't understand the appeal of a giant truck unless you actually need it.