Yes, and they were declared. As he has no power to agree government contracts, I fail to see how this is a conflict of interest.
It also shouldn't be too surprising that the UK government should negotiate contracts with all of the major pharmaceutical companies to secure a good supply. GSK is one of those companies. I would have been more surprised if they hadn't at least approached them.
If you have evidence that Valance has exerted undue influence, you should present it.
Good grief. You surely must realise that, in this day and age, there is no reason why Cummings had to be there in person to negotiate a contract. Have you heard of Zoom? Skype? Heck, even email?
Furthermore, the Barnard Castle plant is a manufacturing hub. Do you know if they have the authority to negotiate on a company-wide basis with the UK government there? Is there any record of GSK executives travelling up from London to meet Cummings?
(Yes. GSK's global HQ is in London. Quite why they would all drive hundreds of miles to Barnard Castle and back, when they could have met up in London far more easily, is another question for you to consider.)
You appear to be unaware of the costs involved in developing new medicines, and also of the varying approaches by the major players to the issue of profits.
Some reading for you:
https://www.fiercepharma.com/pharma...-should-forgo-profits-covid-19-vaccine-report