• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Jeremy Bamber

Seems to me the 50% detection figure on "people known to have fired a gun" is not a useful statistic for a person proposed to have fired tens of rounds from a blowback operated rifle.
Sheila shot her parents at about 3 am.
It is probably not known when she killed the twins.
She had time to consider a range of mortal questions until she was seen by the police moving in the windows some time later.
Maybe she washed her hands like Lady MacBeth.
 
Sheila shot her parents at about 3 am.
It is probably not known when she killed the twins.
She had time to consider a range of mortal questions until she was seen by the police moving in the windows some time later.
Maybe she washed her hands like Lady MacBeth.

And maybe this is unsupported wild speculation.

Hang on, drop the maybe.
 
And maybe this is unsupported wild speculation.

Hang on, drop the maybe.
This is exactly not wild unsupported speculation.
It is precisely what happened.
There are 11,000 posts on Injustice Anywhere forum owned by Bruce Fischer that show this.
Holly Goodhead is an admin on the Bamber red forum and did heavy lifting to prove with bullet casings , trajectories precisely how Sheila Caffel killed her family.
She cannot be blamed for the evil acts of the police, prosecutors, judges, relatives and the negligence of the British people after her act of extreme mental derangement.
 
Sheila shot her parents at about 3 am.
It is probably not known when she killed the twins.
She had time to consider a range of mortal questions until she was seen by the police moving in the windows some time later.
Maybe she washed her hands like Lady MacBeth.

Sheila pumped bullets into the skulls of her two twin boys? Really? Why would she have if she could have just as easily blamed the mysterious stranger in dark clothing as usually happens in such cases (cf Anneli Auer).
 
Colin Stagg got off his murder charge in the Jill Dando case on the grounds the gunpowder traces on his clothes "could have got there by chance".
Not exactly, the case was ended by acquittal by the trial judge on the grounds that the confession was valueless and there was no other evidence.
The murder was committed by Robert Napper.
 
Sheila shot her parents at about 3 am.
It is probably not known when she killed the twins.
She had time to consider a range of mortal questions until she was seen by the police moving in the windows some time later.
Maybe she washed her hands like Lady MacBeth.
And "maybe" the murders were committed by time-travelling aliens....
:rolleyes:
 
Not exactly, the case was ended by acquittal by the trial judge on the grounds that the confession was valueless and there was no other evidence.
The murder was committed by Robert Napper.

Erratum: I meant Barry George. Stagg, of course, had been investigated over Rachel Nickel killed on Wimbledon Common. George was acquitted of Jill Dando's murder.
 
This is exactly not wild unsupported speculation.
It is precisely what happened.
There are 11,000 posts on Injustice Anywhere forum owned by Bruce Fischer that show this.
Holly Goodhead is an admin on the Bamber red forum and did heavy lifting to prove with bullet casings , trajectories precisely how Sheila Caffel killed her family.
She cannot be blamed for the evil acts of the police, prosecutors, judges, relatives and the negligence of the British people after her act of extreme mental derangement.

Bruce Fischer is no recommendation. However, if Sheila did kill her entire family, I must say, how jolly altruistic of her, to ensure her dear brother, Jeremy, alone would inherit the parents' wealth. To answer the question cui bono, why, the answer always comes back to Jeremy. After all, had Sheila wanted to top her entire family, you'd think she'd wait for Jeremy to turn up - perhaps give him a bell - and then let him have it. Jeremy might be in prison but he must consider himself a very lucky fellow to have narrowly escaped his sister's insane massacre of her own family.
 
Bruce Fischer is no recommendation. However, if Sheila did kill her entire family, I must say, how jolly altruistic of her, to ensure her dear brother, Jeremy, alone would inherit the parents' wealth. To answer the question cui bono, why, the answer always comes back to Jeremy. After all, had Sheila wanted to top her entire family, you'd think she'd wait for Jeremy to turn up - perhaps give him a bell - and then let him have it. Jeremy might be in prison but he must consider himself a very lucky fellow to have narrowly escaped his sister's insane massacre of her own family.
You are making the simple mistake of ignoring the bullet trajectories. These preclude Bamber from shooting anyone. The inheritance was of no concern to Sheila, cultural dynamics mean she assumes she will always be cared for one way or another.
 
Bollocks.
Carol Ann Lee uses the police reconstruction in her book.
This was the best attempt and it was ridiculous at every detail.
I know you have never analysed the police reconstruction because if you had you could never say "bollocks" to my post.
If anyone reads this thread please refer to the police reconstruction to check whether it could have happened.
I will post it presently.
 
In fact John, owner of the red Bamber forum, on which activist Holly Goodhead for Bamber and his CCRC campaign is an administrator, says that Bamber must have used chloroform from the farm stores to deactivate Sheila before he shot her.
I make nothing up here
 
Carol Ann Lee uses the police reconstruction in her book.
This was the best attempt and it was ridiculous at every detail.
I know you have never analysed the police reconstruction because if you had you could never say "bollocks" to my post.
If anyone reads this thread please refer to the police reconstruction to check whether it could have happened.
I will post it presently.

Bollocks
 

Jeremy Bamber is everyman in the context of those randomly selected by fate to be a nearby person.
Many examples on this subforum, including Luke Mitchell, Mark Lundy, Amanda Knox, Raffaele Sollecito, David Tamihere, Brendan Dassey, and so on.
You may laugh at these people, but be sure you are correct before laughing.
Jeremy Bamber is innocent.
 
Jeremy Bamber is everyman in the context of those randomly selected by fate to be a nearby person.
Many examples on this subforum, including Luke Mitchell, Mark Lundy, Amanda Knox, Raffaele Sollecito, David Tamihere, Brendan Dassey, and so on.
You may laugh at these people, but be sure you are correct before laughing.
Jeremy Bamber is innocent.

I was just laughing at the idea of Bamber being my son. He will surely have shot me to get his inheritance early.

You seem to have this weird idea that if a killer has youthful good looks they must be innocent. However, truth is, callow youth murders seem to be especially cold-blooded (see thread 'Teenage Killers in Finland') yet people seem to romanticise them based on carefully touched up images designed to idealise them. Johnny Depp's idealisation of the West Memphis Three just because he shared the same love of dark metal is a case in point.

Yet if these same people looked like ugly gnarled up quasimodos you wouldn't be championing their 'innocence', especially when given in a criminal court of aw the evidence is stacked up against them, turning a blind eye to the very obvious.
 
I was just laughing at the idea of Bamber being my son. He will surely have shot me to get his inheritance early.

You seem to have this weird idea that if a killer has youthful good looks they must be innocent. However, truth is, callow youth murders seem to be especially cold-blooded (see thread 'Teenage Killers in Finland') yet people seem to romanticise them based on carefully touched up images designed to idealise them. Johnny Depp's idealisation of the West Memphis Three just because he shared the same love of dark metal is a case in point.

Yet if these same people looked like ugly gnarled up quasimodos you wouldn't be championing their 'innocence', especially when given in a criminal court of aw the evidence is stacked up against them, turning a blind eye to the very obvious.
The examples I cite are innocent. I have no need to comment on their worth, but Tamihere aside they seem ordinary and functional. Damien Echols was less advantaged but still innocent.
 

Back
Top Bottom