What things from the OP should I stop taking too literally? For reference, here's what I'm taking literally:
"There's a conspiracy theory making the rounds..."
Is that supposed to be figurative? Is there not a literal conspiracy theory being literally circulated?
"The theorists say..."
Are there not literal theorists? Is nobody literally saying what arayder attributes to them? If so, what is the correct interpretation?
"It is pointed out that..."
Is it not literally pointed out? Is nobody actually pointing out anything?
"They point out..."
Do they not literally point things out?
"Theorists ask..."
Are there not literal theorists? Are they not asking literal questions? Are they literally not asking questions?
If arayder isn't talking about literal theorists literally circulating a literal conspiracy theory, then what is the correct figurative interpretation of the OP?
---
And regardless of the correct figurative interpretation, the OP itself is a literal attempt to circulate a conspiracy theory, by the time-honored method of "just asking questions". arayder isn't saying there's a conspiracy. He's just saying that other people are saying there's a conspiracy. Except, apparently, there are no other people, and there is no conspiracy theory. Just arayder saying there is one... figuratively.
If this is what Menard-following has come to, drumming up rumors of conspiracy theories, then I don't really see the point of following the guy and reporting on his antics at all.
What's next? Florida Man is working for the Chinese government? (I'm not saying, I'm just saying...)