Ed Corona Virus Conspiracy Theories....

Status
Not open for further replies.
What are you talking about?????
WE know that mrna has a lot of functions. What is not noted in your alarmist website is any connection between what the vaccines do with mrna and what the function of altered mrna is in cases of leukemia. The reference to Sloan Kettering is vague, non-specific, and fleeting.

Of course others will have noted that Sloan Kettering has not uttered an official announcement on this dubious claim, and it has not altered their policy of vaccinating their personnel. Does this not suggest, at the very least, that your information may be at the very least somewhat incomplete?

If an institution like Sloan-Kettering or Mayo Clinic made an important discovery, are you really such a conspiracy nut that you believe they would, for some conspiracy-fed reason, suppress their announcement of it, but at the same time be so stupid as not to suppress the findings or statements that other sites use to make their dubious statements?

To find a conspiracy here requires paradoxically that the people in question are both smarter and stupider than themselves. They find out something important and hitherto unkown, a seminal discovery of Nobel proportions, but they are too foolish to publish it and too stupid to hide it. e.t.a. but for all their stupidity and stubborn foolishness, what do you know? The conspiracy sites find the authority of their statements definitive!
 
Last edited:
Can't say the blogger didn't warn you. I love this from his "professional services" section:

All these services share a common feature: the invention of new and better reality, and making that reality as impactful as possible.

Jon Rappoport


It does appear he's doing a yeoman's job creating an alternate reality. Too bad it isn't the one I live in.
It's a reality where HIV doesn't cause AIDS, germs don't cause disease and grammar is optional.
 
Judy Mikovits . . . bwahahahahahahahaha!!
But guys, Judy Mikovits -- if you do a simple Google search -- you can find out the main claim of the video is that she was falsely arrested with no charges for like going against Fauci or something. No, she was arrested because she took -- stole -- equipment, notes, and data from a lab that she was fired from. She's a PhD scientist.

She was known for, in 2009, putting out a paper saying that chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) was caused by a murine virus. It turns out that paper was retracted from Science when they realized no one could replicate it and her methods and science were completely shoddy.

And . . .

. . . Mikovits also accuses Anthony Fauci, head of the U.S. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) and a prominent member of the White House’s Coronavirus Task Force, of being responsible for the deaths of millions during the early years of the HIV/AIDS pandemic. The video claims Mikovits was part of the team that discovered HIV, revolutionized HIV treatment, and was jailed without charges for her scientific positions.

Science fact-checked the video. None of these claims are true. The video is an excerpt from a forthcoming movie Plandemic, which promises to “expose the scientific and political elite who run the scam that is our global health system.” YouTube, Facebook, and other platforms have taken down the video because of inaccuracies. It keeps resurfacing, including on the Plandemic website, which, in “an effort to bypass the gatekeepers of free speech,” invites people to download the video and repost it.
 
Based on what? Just their age? If that's the case, should we be listening to someone who, for example, proclaims their age to be 82?

Based on what I, imvho, perceive as goofiness, ymmv.
My father-in-law recently died at age 100, but he was still lucid and not goofy right up till the end.

Luck of the draw.
 
Last edited:
Based on what I, imvho, perceive as goofiness, ymmv.
My father-in-law recently died at age 100, but he was still lucid and not goofy right up till the end.

Luck of the draw.

But what about the thousands of scientists and doctors who agree with the conclusions of Fauci?

Again, I have only heard of Fauci second hand from this forum. He doesn't get mentioned on BBC news, but lots of scientists and doctors who are from this country do and, shock of all shocks, they agree with the science.

Why are you so laser focused on Fauci? Even if he was a delusional quack who wouldn't know the truth if it gave him a lapdance, science does not rely on the say so of individuals.
 
The Truth, you believe 2 old cogers in govt -- Biden and Fauci are truth tellers?????
False. I have no need to pay any attention to either of them. I am not an American and I don't live in America.

Since you are saying that them being "old codgers" is relevant to how truthful they are, and since you claim to be an "old codger" yourself, how should we assess how truthful YOU are?
 
But what about the thousands of scientists and doctors who agree with the conclusions of Fauci?

Again, I have only heard of Fauci second hand from this forum. He doesn't get mentioned on BBC news, but lots of scientists and doctors who are from this country do and, shock of all shocks, they agree with the science.

Why are you so laser focused on Fauci? Even if he was a delusional quack who wouldn't know the truth if it gave him a lapdance, science does not rely on the say so of individuals.


Well, Tom seems to be Yankistani. Fauci's equivillain in your country as "the expert™" seems to be (De)Nial Ferguson with his great models. Here in Germany, it is Dr. Osten.

btw, as a coincidance I have on my "to watch" list at prominent spot a video where this lady Mikovits is a participant. I have heard the name before but cannot put a face or a viewpoint to her. From what I've heard, she got "schooled" by Andrew Kaufman, a man that could be smeared with David Icke connections, on the state of virology. Hey, it's the "CT" thread after all.
 
Last edited:
The Truth, you believe 2 old cogers in govt -- Biden and Fauci are truth tellers?????

You claim to be older than both of them, and yet you expect us to believe you. Even though you have posted contradicting info in this thread that confirms you are unreliable. Codgers, indeed
 
It's got nothing to do with codgers and everything to do with the best science, which on its worst day is better than anything CTers vomit.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom