What exactly was the point you think you made about it?
I think some people have addressed what appears to have been his point on
C. diff. Palven notes that people who are at the door of death from various causes often actually die of more immediate things, such as the common
C diff, but they are still said to have died of the diseases that led them to that last hurdle. He thus concludes that the same should be applied broadly to the attribution of death by Covid-19.
What I think is omitted is the fact that such things as
C diff and pneumonia are common and predictable final illnesses for people who were very close to death already - that is, people whose death was certain and predictable. That is quite different from the trivially obvious point that a person with a health problem might not survive Covid-19. The difference is that even if the bad health was a major contributor to the death, the absence of Covid-19 would make a real and tangible difference in the outcome.
If I am in horrible health such that the duration of my future life is tenuous, and you come up with a gun and shoot me, it's appropriate to say I was shot to death, even if you could make a case that I'd have lived if I had been fitter, and even if there's a significant chance that I could drop dead at any time.
I think something like this argument has not been absent from this thread, but that is not the same as having it acknowledged, much less accepted.
e.t.a. If I've gotten Tom Palven's point wrong, I invite him to state it more correctly, but request that it be done without musical accompaniment.