The Biden Presidency

Status
Not open for further replies.
To me it sounds like they were haggling with Politico to see what the minimally acceptable punishment was to make the story go away, which ultimately didn't work.

I hope you realize that your bias will make you twist everything regarding Biden to the absolute worst possible extent imaginable, while most people will look for a much more reasonable interpretation.
 
We're still going on about this?

This shows the difference between Trump and Biden. Trump provided a new controversy every day. Sometimes 5 or 6 new controversies a day. People need something to talk about. They are so desperate for controversy, that they will make one out of nothing.

Hell hath no fury greater then a dissapointed Berniebro.
 
Hell hath no fury greater then a dissapointed Berniebro.

I seriously don't get this. Let's say that he's right. Biden exaggerated how quickly he would fire someone who was disrespectful. I don't think it was a lie. But for argument sake, let's call it a lie.

That's one in a month. He's falling behind. Trump averaged just a hair under 21 per day or 628 a month.

Woo, call the Senate. We need another impeachment.

:rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
I seriously don't get this. Let's say that he's right. Biden exaggerated how quickly he would fire someone who was disrespectful. I don't think it was a lie. But for argument sake, let's call it a lie.

That's one in a month. He's falling behind. Trump averaged just a hair under 21 per day or 628 a month.

Woo, call the Senate. We need another impeachment.

:rolleyes:

To be honest, I don't really see this is anything other than a passing story of the day type thing, but I'm impressed by the libs here that refuse to see this as even the mildly embarrassing story that is obviously is. I very much doubt Biden himself had much to do with this at all, it was always small potatoes stuff.

Some Biden staffer talked out of his ass and his boss didn't really live up to the standards promised, which was pretty quickly rectified once negative press coverage made the situation too embarrassing to sweep under the rug.

It's undoubtedly a good thing that this is the kind of thing the Biden administration is at least able to be shamed with, as other administrations likely would have just doubled down or played games.

I don't understand the knee-jerk apologism being employed here, especially given that everyone involved has pretty much admitted this shook out exactly as described and the guy "resigned". Truly baffled by these suggestions of weeks long investigation and deliberation rather than the plainly obvious attempt to make the story go away and protect their own guy from the consequences of his unprofessional conduct.
 
Last edited:
To be honest, I don't really see this is anything other than a passing story of the day type thing, but I'm impressed by the libs here that refuse to see this as even the mildly embarrassing story that is obviously is. I very much doubt Biden himself had much to do with this at all, it was always small potatoes stuff.

Some Biden staffer talked out of his ass and his boss didn't really live up to the standards promised, which was pretty quickly rectified once negative press coverage made the situation too embarrassing to sweep under the rug.

It's undoubtedly a good thing that this is the kind of thing the Biden administration is at least able to be shamed with, as other administrations likely would have just doubled down or played games.

I don't understand the knee-jerk apologism being employed here, especially given that everyone involved has pretty much admitted this shook out exactly as described and the guy "resigned". Truly baffled by these suggestions of weeks long investigation and deliberation rather than the plainly obvious attempt to make the story go away and protect their own guy from the consequences of his unprofessional conduct.


I'm baffled by anyone caring.

I'm not apologizing. But it is a tempest in a teacup, is it not?

There's a pandemic going on. There are cabinet members yet to be approved. There are departments being reorganized. There is a 1.9 trillion dollar stimulus being worked on. There are the oil leases and oil exploration being limited. There's an infrastructure initiative. Issues with immigration and ICE. There are Trump holdovers like Dejoy causing issues.

And this just touches the surface of issues.

And yet, you've gone on for 4 pages of posts about one mid level guy being a dick not being fired quick enough?

You'll excuse me if my outrage sensor doesn't register.
 
I'm not apologizing. But it is a tempest in a teacup, is it not?

There's a pandemic going on. There are cabinet members yet to be approved. There are departments being reorganized. There is a 1.9 trillion dollar stimulus being worked on. There are the oil leases and oil exploration being limited. There's an infrastructure initiative. Issues with immigration and ICE. There are Trump holdovers like Dejoy causing issues.

And this just touches the surface of issues.

And yet, you've gone on for 4 pages of posts about one mid level guy being a dick not being fired quick enough?

You'll excuse me if my outrage sensor doesn't register.

Yes, it's a petty story. Not really consequential in any meaningful scale, and certainly not an outrage.


It's been a meta conversation for pretty much all of the 4 pages. There seem to be some here dedicated that there was no tempest nor a teapot.

If you want to change the subject, how's this? Where's our $2000 we were promised?
 
Last edited:
Yes, it's a petty story. Not really consequential in any meaningful scale, and certainly not an outrage.


It's been a meta conversation for pretty much all of the 4 pages. There seem to be some here dedicated that there was no tempest nor a teapot.

Other than yourself and Delvo, I don't think anyone sees the tempest. You've gone on for pages complaining about the length of time it took, but between the 2 of you we haven't heard a peep about how long it should have taken. Until you can articulate what exactly the administration should have done differently and why, we still don't even have a teacup.

If you want to change the subject, how's this? Where's our $2000 we were promised?

Wait, how can we ask the administration to even start thinking about the Covid relief bill? Don't they still have to focus on minor transgressions that may have happened? I think Biden better start counting paperclips and making sure nobody is using more than their fair share of toilet paper before he starts thinking about working for the American public.


Plus, what bombshell is Vanity Fair about to drop that'll completely change focus on what the administration should be doing?
 
Last edited:
Other than yourself and Delvo, I don't think anyone sees the tempest. You've gone on for pages complaining about the length of time it took, but between the 2 of you we haven't heard a peep about how long it should have taken. Until you can articulate what exactly the administration should have done differently and why, we still don't even have a teacup.


Wait, how can we ask the administration to even start thinking about the Covid relief bill? Don't they still have to focus on minor transgressions that may have happened?

So you're a Ducklo truther? I mean, everyone's admitted it happened, including Ducklo in his resignation letter.
 
So you're a Ducklo truther? I mean, everyone's admitted it happened, including Ducklo in his resignation letter.

You have misread, again.

I'm joining your demand that the Biden administration stop thinking about working for the public and instead focus all their time and energy on this and any possible other allegations.

What if someone is stealing paperclips? I'm sure we can agree that we want our President to stop those Covid negotiations until every paperclip is accounted for.
 
You have misread, again.

I'm joining your demand that the Biden administration stop thinking about working for the public and instead focus all their time and energy on this and any possible other allegations.

What if someone is stealing paperclips? I'm sure we can agree that we want our President to stop those Covid negotiations until every paperclip is accounted for.

Seems to me the press secretary can fire a press staffer without the whole admin grinding to a halt, but maybe I have higher expectations than you. I don't see any indication this was a topic of conversation at any level higher than press secretary Psaki.

What did you mean by transgression that "may" have happened? Do you doubt that it happened? Ducklo admitted as much when he quit.
 
Last edited:
Yes, it's a petty story. Not really consequential in any meaningful scale, and certainly not an outrage.


It's been a meta conversation for pretty much all of the 4 pages. There seem to be some here dedicated that there was no tempest nor a teapot.

If you want to change the subject, how's this? Where's our $2000 we were promised?

That's better. At least it is substantive.
 
Seems to me the press secretary can fire a press staffer without the whole admin grinding to a halt, but maybe I have higher expectations than you.

What did you mean by transgression that "may" have happened? Do you doubt that it happened? Ducklo admitted as much when he quit.

Exactly what I said. Any and all transgressions that may have happened should clearly be the priority, not stupid stuff like Cabinet nominations or Covid relief negotiating! We want Biden's Presidency to be completely focused on constantly monitoring serious news organizations such as Vanity Fair to immediately fire any and all members of the organization without so much as asking for their side of the story!
 
Exactly what I said. Any and all transgressions that may have happened should clearly be the priority, not stupid stuff like Cabinet nominations or Covid relief negotiating! We want Biden's Presidency to be completely focused on constantly monitoring serious news organizations such as Vanity Fair to immediately fire any and all members of the organization without so much as asking for their side of the story!

Do you doubt that this transgression happened? You keep using "may".
 
Last edited:
Do you doubt that this transgression happened? You keep using "may".

Was Ducklo not being truthful when he admitted his bad conduct in his resignation letter?

What part of "any and all" is confusing you? Is there something about that phrase that makes you think it's limited to one event?

Come on, I'm agreeing with you! If the kid at the counter at my local convenience store can be fired on a whim, then I want Biden to start firing his people on a whim, too! The entire administration should be focused on Vanity Fair reports that might out more bad behavior, so that they can be fired with no investigation. That's way more important than dumb stuff like running the country!

Just...now that we're in agreement that whatever the administration did wrong was totally wrong, would you mind sharing what exactly it was that they did wrong?
 
What part of "any and all" is confusing you? Is there something about that phrase that makes you think it's limited to one event?

Come on, I'm agreeing with you! If the kid at the counter at my local convenience store can be fired on a whim, then I want Biden to start firing his people on a whim, too! The entire administration should be focused on Vanity Fair reports that might out more bad behavior, so that they can be fired with no investigation. That's way more important than dumb stuff like running the country!

Just...now that we're in agreement that whatever the administration did wrong was totally wrong, would you mind sharing what exactly it was that they did wrong?

You seem awfully evasive on this basic question. Do you think Ducklo engaged in the bad behavior that he was accused of and admitted to when he resigned?
 
You seem awfully evasive on this basic question. Do you think Ducklo engaged in the bad behavior that he was accused of and admitted to when he resigned?

I don't tend to answer stupid questions, especially as I've already said that we all agree that Ducklo being forced out was the right thing(I'm part of "we" for those intentionally trying to miss the point).

Now that that's out of the way, can we get back to demanding that the Biden administration be run like my local McDonald's and stop trying to get anything done?
 
I don't tend to answer stupid questions, especially as I've already said that we all agree that Ducklo being forced out was the right thing(I'm part of "we" for those intentionally trying to miss the point).

Now that that's out of the way, can we get back to demanding that the Biden administration be run like my local McDonald's and stop trying to get anything done?

I mean, if the cashier at McDonalds spoke to a customer the way Ducklo spoke to that journalist, it wouldn't take weeks and bad press to get fired.

Your evasiveness is noted. Maybe you can start a "Ducklo Truther" thread in the CT section.
 
Last edited:
I'm baffled by anyone caring.

I'm not apologizing. But it is a tempest in a teacup, is it not?

There's a pandemic going on. There are cabinet members yet to be approved. There are departments being reorganized. There is a 1.9 trillion dollar stimulus being worked on. There are the oil leases and oil exploration being limited. There's an infrastructure initiative. Issues with immigration and ICE. There are Trump holdovers like Dejoy causing issues.

And this just touches the surface of issues.

And yet, you've gone on for 4 pages of posts about one mid level guy being a dick not being fired quick enough?

You'll excuse me if my outrage sensor doesn't register.

There's a reason for the imbalance. Those issues (which are very real) you raised are very complicated, involve scientific information and have huge political overtones. Thus, they're not easy to debate in one or two paragraphs. They're also in some sense abstract in that they involve nearly anyone.

But the firing is none of that. It is small, easy to get a grasp on and many of us have probably been in one position of another in whole shebang. It involves only a couple of people and has no (or at least very little) policy implications. In short, it's a perfect debate topic!
 
That's better. At least it is substantive.

It seems to me that the Democrats are really playing with fire on this issue. They ran very explicitly on the promise of $2000 checks. Not delivering on this seems like something that will be deeply alienating to the voters.

There's already been the 1400 vs 2000 debate, now there's murmuring of means testing who gets the 1400 check more strictly than all the relief that was issued during the Trump admin, and there doesn't really seem to be much urgency in getting this out the door.

The way I see it, the Democrats have 2 years before the next election to make the case that life for average people is better with them in charge. The wavering on the relief checks, which is a political slam dunk, makes me think that we're going to be looking at a Republican controlled House very soon.
 
I mean, if the cashier at McDonalds spoke to a customer the way Ducklo spoke to that journalist, it wouldn't take weeks and bad press to get fired.

There we go! Weeks schmeeks, we want no investigation at all! No asking for the employee's side, no review of video, hell not even engaging (that means talking) with the person the employee is alleged to have talked to! And if that means we don't have anyone to work the counter, that's just the price you have to pay for being righteous! And if we spend all our time firing all our people instead of working for the people, it's even better!

Your evasiveness is noted. Maybe you can start a "Ducklo Truther" thread in the CT section.

Dang, I still used too many big words? Sorry, I really don't feel like trying to dumb it down more for you.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom