Cont: Trump et al continued “2020 election” conspiracy theories

Status
Not open for further replies.
Captain_Swoop said:
Trump Tweets

Swing States that have found massive VOTER FRAUD, which is all of them, CANNOT LEGALLY CERTIFY these votes as complete & correct without committing a severely punishable crime. Everybody knows that dead people, below age people, illegal immigrants, fake signatures, prisoners,....

.....and many others voted illegally. Also, machine “glitches” (another word for FRAUD), ballot harvesting, non-resident voters, fake ballots, “stuffing the ballot box”, votes for pay, roughed up Republican Poll Watchers, and sometimes even more votes than people voting, took....

....place in Detroit, Philadelphia, Milwaukee, Atlanta, Pittsburgh, and elsewhere. In all Swing State cases, there are far more votes than are necessary to win the State, and the Election itself. Therefore, VOTES CANNOT BE CERTIFIED. THIS ELECTION IS UNDER PROTEST!
Click to expand...
Every state ran a perfect election except for the swing states, which saw massive fraud. Hmmmm...... Yeah, that make sense. :rolleyes:
 
Guys, we need to immediately tell our co-conspirators to get busy ASAP folding those mail in ballots because forensic analysis !!


Jovan Hutton Pulitzer, known for his work on scan/pay tech at airports, toll booths, etc, explains how flat unfolded ballots fail the kinematic artifact scan ie a forensic analysis, which provides the simplest ballot verification, needing only to examine the paper.
Click to expand...



If you hate fair elections do not share this video!!


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UgeqGmvQXKs&feature=emb_logo
 
Hutton says everything his team is working on today will be the security standard to prevent more stolen elections.
 
Bubba said:
Hutton says everything his team is working on today will be the security standard to prevent more stolen elections.
Click to expand...

Oh Bubba, first you'd have to establish a stolen election. Didn't your wacky sources tell you that?
 
Whatever. Hutton is the real deal.

He says they are looking for the wrong type of evidence. What they need to do is what always stands up in court in cases of electronic fraud. Its actually quite informative. He makes it clear that this automated analysis technique catches all unfolded (bogus) mailed ballots.
 
Bubba said:
Guys, we need to immediately tell our co-conspirators to get busy ASAP folding those mail in ballots because forensic analysis !!






If you hate fair elections do not share this video!!


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UgeqGmvQXKs&feature=emb_logo
Click to expand...

A true sign of flim-flam is someone taking far too long to say something really simple. I wasn't going to spend 20 minutes watching the video, but clicking around I saw all sorts of gobbledygook, where he can prove that the vote was fraudulent, and that he, personally, was an expert in lots of digital things and great at explaining them, and yet, he didn't explain it.

Maybe you can. Tell me where he gets to the point so I don't have to spend twenty minutes looking.


(Note to others: Not that I think there is even the smallest shred of possibility that this guy noticed something that has escaped everyone else, and that the fraud really is easy to prove, but I'm always curious about what the wooish crowd is saying. I'm just not curious enough to spend twenty minutes watching in order to find out.
 
There is also not even the smallest shred of possibility that Bubba's response will add clarity.
 
Meadmaker said:
. . . I'm always curious about what the wooish crowd is saying. I'm just not curious enough to spend twenty minutes watching in order to find out.
Click to expand...

Again, to paraphrase Dara O'Briain, "We don't need to turn from a NASA scientist to Barry, a man who thinks the sky is a carpet painted by god, just for balance."
 
Meadmaker said:
A true sign of flim-flam is someone taking far too long to say something really simple. I wasn't going to spend 20 minutes watching the video, but clicking around I saw all sorts of gobbledygook, where he can prove that the vote was fraudulent, and that he, personally, was an expert in lots of digital things and great at explaining them, and yet, he didn't explain it.

Maybe you can. Tell me where he gets to the point so I don't have to spend twenty minutes looking.


(Note to others: Not that I think there is even the smallest shred of possibility that this guy noticed something that has escaped everyone else, and that the fraud really is easy to prove, but I'm always curious about what the wooish crowd is saying. I'm just not curious enough to spend twenty minutes watching in order to find out.
Click to expand...


I think that in other words, you are just not interested, as the following was sufficient


Jovan Hutton Pulitzer, known for his work on scan/pay tech at airports, toll booths, etc, explains how flat unfolded ballots fail the kinematic artifact scan ie a forensic analysis, which provides the simplest ballot verification, needing only to examine the paper.
Click to expand...


His emphasis is on how relatively simple it is to determine if "mailed" ballots were never folded/mailed. It is very informative.

Ad hominems fail against the scientific forensic analysis he describes, relied upon in court cases.
 
Bubba said:
. . . court cases.
Click to expand...
Speaing of court cases Bubba, why have virtually all of Trump's court cases, including The Big One (snicker) failed?
 
Bubba, what happened to The Storm? How about The Plan? Is it still trustworthy? Are you at all sheepish at being gulled by the troll pretending to be Q?
 
Bubba said:
The guy is legit....Look him up. He knows the game, even though his invention CueCat eventually flopped.
Click to expand...
I stopped paying attention right about the time he claimed to have invented the QR code.
 
Bubba said:
So...you'd say all never been folded mail in ballots would be legit??
Click to expand...
I have no real opinion on that, as I don't know the overall system well enough, but I see no reason to take advice from a guy who lies in his own introduction.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom