The Biden Presidency

Status
Not open for further replies.
A move towards reconciliation between the progressive and centrist wings of the Democratic Party.

Incoming DCCC chair promises to end blacklist policy. Vendors who worked in primary challenges were blacklisted from ever working for the party.

Maloney told Axios over the weekend that the blacklist “separated ourselves from some of the most creative and diverse people working in politics, particularly in the area of digital and social media.”

https://theintercept.com/2020/12/03/dccc-election-blacklist-sean-patrick-maloney/

In light of the poor election returns for House races, Democrats seem to be deciding that sabotaging progressive challengers isn't worth denying themselves access to savvy political vendors.
 
And yet - we live in a Democracy. Can't implement the changes needed without those people who never got pepper sprayed or called the police when they needed them.

An slogan works better if it appeals to everybody, not just the activists.

Unless you get support from the Moderates, the centrists..whose homeland is the Suburbs...you will get nothing done in this country.
I think a lot of progressives simply refuse to accept this. It moves out of their comfort zone, which is dealing with other progressives.Also a hell of a lot easier.
You don't need to convince the people who go to the demonstrations,you need to cnvince the people who don't go.
Living in an echo chamber does not help this situation.
 
Just saw the first snipptes form Biden's CNN interview. He said he would asks Americans to wear masks for just 100 Days to see what happens.
I love Biden, but the term 100 days give me pause. Will it be FDR's 100 Days Or Napoleon's 100 Days?
 
Jake Tapper tweeted
@jaketapper

News: @JoeBiden tells me he spoke with Dr. Fauci this afternoon, asked Fauci to stay on in his position at NIAID, and also to serve as a chief medical adviser for him.
Clip coming up on @CNN on @CNNSitRoom
Full interview w Biden/Harris at 9 pm ET
 

I'll quote myself from earlier this year:

ETA: the thing that struck me about Obama's condemnation of wright was how much he concentrated on Wright saying "Obama is a politician, and speaks in the way politicians do. I'm a reverend, I speak the way reverends so." Both of these are...perfectly correct, really.

I said this even back before I joined here - and I view it as perfectly correct, and perfectly fine as well. I've always regarded Obama as center-left. I voted for him over McCain and Romney, and in the primaries symbolically over Clinton (and to be clear, they were close enough that this vote was absolutely about symbolism only), that never meant that I would agree with everything he did - and I don't expect that of any president. What he's saying is exactly what I expect he would say. He's a politician who shows up to build political power, not an activist who is there to push the overton window.

Again, as a politician, he's correct - but only one person actually ran in part on "defund the police", and that was the newly elected representative Cori Bush. A few others discussed it, in terms of "policing in my district should be the same as policing in wealthy suburbs", and even then they didn't outright push it. Both Biden and Sanders want to give the police additional funding for training. I'm skeptical that this won't go right to "warrior" policing and "killology" pro-violence garbage, particularly for police forces who most need drastic reform.

The black kids who are tired of police running up and beating them because they "fit the description" aren't there for friendly chats. They didn't swamp Bloomberg out by being nice or using the right slogan, they did it by pointing out that he's the guy that openly and willfully advocated for a violently racist policing policy to the point where even many lower-level police were (anonymously) giving interviews discussing how awful and counterproductive it was.

Will the slogan turn out to be helpful (and while it does state part of the policy, it's *also* a slogan)? Well, I looked into my crystal ball, and I saw the other side of my room, only upside-down and distorted, because that's the only thing they do. I don't know, and neither does anyone else. Took years, and video after video after video, of wildly unjustified racial police murders, for a slim majority to stop saying "No *all* lives matter! Why are you making this racial?"
 
Bizarre... Axios has a report that apparently Biden and his people thought they were doing what the left would want with the appointment of... Neera Tanden... because she's... female and not quite 100% white. :eek:

My immediate reaction is that there's no way that's true because they can't actually be that stupid and politically unaware. But then, what could they be trying to hide with that as the cover story?
 
Bizarre... My immediate reaction is that there's no way that's true because they can't actually be that stupid and politically unaware. But then, what could they be trying to hide with that as the cover story?
Bizarre...

My immediate reaction is that there's no way that's true because a poster can't actually be that stupid and politically unaware.

But then, what could they be trying to hide?
 
Bizarre... Axios has a report that apparently Biden and his people thought they were doing what the left would want with the appointment of... Neera Tanden... because she's... female and not quite 100% white. :eek:

My immediate reaction is that there's no way that's true because they can't actually be that stupid and politically unaware. But then, what could they be trying to hide with that as the cover story?

It's the funniest possible explanation, so it must be true.

The centrist wing of the party is completely out of touch with the progressives. Even if they want to throw a bone, they don't know enough to do it properly. It's not implausible that they honestly thought austerity hawk Tanden was someone they would like because she was from a thinktank with "Progress" in the name.

There has been an effort over the last few years to lock out progressive voices from the party administration. It should be no surprise that there's no one in position to give advice to the Biden administration about what the progressives would want.
 
Last edited:
It's the funniest possible explanation, so it must be true.

The centrist wing of the party is completely out of touch with the progressives. Even if they want to throw a bone, they don't know enough to do it properly. It's not implausible that they honestly thought austerity hawk Tanden was someone they would like because she was from a thinktank with "Progress" in the name.

There has been an effort over the last few years to lock out progressive voices from the party administration. It should be no surprise that there's no one in position to give advice to the Biden administration about what the progressives would want.

Pretty much a case of trying to follow the form mechanically, rather than understanding the actual principles in play, if true, yeah. Having people in power that are visibly representative of the people that they're trying to lead is a good thing on multiple levels, but it's not as important as what they're likely to do with the power that they're being given. I'm going to be a bit cynical here, though. While that explanation is possible, I rather suspect that it might simply be an attempt to save face when their attempt to hoodwink progressives with a "we're giving you what you want in a way that is nothing but window dressing, while we get everything substantial that we want" didn't quite work as planned.
 
Pretty much a case of trying to follow the form mechanically, rather than understanding the actual principles in play, if true, yeah. Having people in power that are visibly representative of the people that they're trying to lead is a good thing on multiple levels, but it's not as important as what they're likely to do with the power that they're being given. I'm going to be a bit cynical here, though. While that explanation is possible, I rather suspect that it might simply be an attempt to save face when their attempt to hoodwink progressives with a "we're giving you what you want in a way that is nothing but window dressing, while we get everything substantial that we want" didn't quite work as planned.

Even then, it shows they are out of touch. Tanden is especially hated among the progressive wing of the party. There's a long history of very public and bitter disagreement between Tanden and other, more progressive political operators. It doesn't help that Tanden is Extremely Online, with a posting history that surpasses even Trump in volume and nearly rivals Trump in belligerence.

Even if the goal was a token, window dressing candidate that checks all the identity boxes while being ideologically centrist, Tanden is uniquely unfit for this kind of tactic. Her name generates a Pavlovian response among progressives.
 
Even then, it shows they are out of touch. Tanden is especially hated among the progressive wing of the party. There's a long history of very public and bitter disagreement between Tanden and other, more progressive political operators. It doesn't help that Tanden is Extremely Online, with a posting history that surpasses even Trump in volume and nearly rivals Trump in belligerence.

It's not just progressives. she has gotten into public spitting matches with pretty much every part of the Democratic party. It seems that no faction actually likes her, she just latched on to some powerful individuals, mainly Podesta and Clinton, and leveraged that into influence.

Even if the goal was a token, window dressing candidate that checks all the identity boxes while being ideologically centrist, Tanden is uniquely unfit for this kind of tactic. Her name generates a Pavlovian response among progressives.

Seriously, the Biden campaign doesn't seem to have trouble finding perfectly qualified women to fill these roles, including women of color. While we can argue over the specific policies of some of these candidates, at least they aren't intentionally trying to alienate other groups within the party.

And you don't even get the benefit of her appeasing the Republicans as a centrist.
 
It's not just progressives. she has gotten into public spitting matches with pretty much every part of the Democratic party. It seems that no faction actually likes her, she just latched on to some powerful individuals, mainly Podesta and Clinton, and leveraged that into influence.



Seriously, the Biden campaign doesn't seem to have trouble finding perfectly qualified women to fill these roles, including women of color. While we can argue over the specific policies of some of these candidates, at least they aren't intentionally trying to alienate other groups within the party.

And you don't even get the benefit of her appeasing the Republicans as a centrist.

Democratic elites not understanding why nobody else likes or trusts their PMC/thinktank pals is very on brand for the party. Tanden is popular with pretty much nobody except for the party operators, so of course she gets the nod.
 
Last edited:
It's the funniest possible explanation, so it must be true.

The centrist wing of the party is completely out of touch with the progressives. Even if they want to throw a bone, they don't know enough to do it properly. It's not implausible that they honestly thought austerity hawk Tanden was someone they would like because she was from a thinktank with "Progress" in the name.

I swear I have seen people, including journalists, use that as proof of her progressive bona fides. Like they don't realize you can put anything on your business card short of MD or Esq.
 
Even then, it shows they are out of touch. Tanden is especially hated among the progressive wing of the party. There's a long history of very public and bitter disagreement between Tanden and other, more progressive political operators. It doesn't help that Tanden is Extremely Online, with a posting history that surpasses even Trump in volume and nearly rivals Trump in belligerence.

Even if the goal was a token, window dressing candidate that checks all the identity boxes while being ideologically centrist, Tanden is uniquely unfit for this kind of tactic. Her name generates a Pavlovian response among progressives.


She is apparently closely identified with Hillary Clinton, an association that I would think Biden would want to avoid.
https://nypost.com/2020/12/01/progressives-enraged-over-biden-picking-neera-tanden-for-omb/
 
Biden crosses the 270 Electoral votes certified

California certified the Presidential election results today awarding the State's 55 electoral votes to President Elect Joe Biden. California state law gives them to December 11.

It's significant because the 55 electoral votes gives Biden more than the 270 votes required to win the Presidency. The certification also meets the December 8th Safe Harbor deadline. That leaves New Jersey and Hawaii. New Jersey will certify on Monday.

Apparently there are two lawsuits in Hawaii that are holding things up. They are however, expected to be resolved on Monday.
 
Mixed signals for the Biden transition.

They have difficulties with the DoD.

Biden DoD transition team needs written approval from Kash Patel, the new Acting Defense Secretary's chief of staff - on the job for 3 weeks - or political appointee Tom Muir to speak with anyone at Pentagon, multiple sources tell Fox, an effort to stymie transition, intimidate.

https://twitter.com/JenGriffinFNC/status/1334989069047242752

Pentagon has been blocking Biden transition team from visiting U.S. spy agencies -- including some that members of Biden team used to run.

https://twitter.com/gregpmiller/status/1334996320214544384


On the other hand, the CIA does cooperate:
Biden team has gotten a very different reception at CIA:
- access to top officials
- classified computer gear
- workspace at 'Scattergood' the historic homestead on CIA campus used for entertaining VIPs

https://twitter.com/gregpmiller/status/1334999167668772873


But the real good news is Biden & Harris can count on the help of ... Kellyanne Conway!
“The president wants to exhaust all of his legal avenues, as he has made clear many times. His team is doing that, and that is his right,” Conway said in an interview with The 19th’s Washington correspondent, Amanda Becker, that aired Friday. “If you look at the vote totals in the Electoral College tally, it looks like Joe Biden and Kamala Harris will prevail. I assume the electors will certify that and it will be official. We, as a nation, will move forward, because we always do.”

Conway also pledged to work with “future administrations,” saying: “If there’s anything I can ever do to help … they can count on me.”

https://19thnews.org/2020/12/kellya...ike-joe-biden-and-kamala-harris-will-prevail/
(bolding mine)
Can't wait for the "thanks, but no thanks" answer from the transition. Hope they put their wittiest member on this task.
 
On the other hand, the CIA does cooperate:
Biden team has gotten a very different reception at CIA:
- access to top officials
- classified computer gear
- workspace at 'Scattergood' the historic homestead on CIA campus used for entertaining VIPs

https://twitter.com/gregpmiller/stat...99167668772873


This is a bit of an aside, but Scattergood has an interesting history for those who geek out about such things. Two unmarried women, possibly a couple, lived on the grounds of the CIA headquarters throughout the 50's, 60's, and 70's with the younger one staying until the late 1980's. Civil rights activists, union organizers, sanctuary movement, all that. They hosted refugees from CIA sponsored wars in Central America. Living in their cute house right there at CIA.

In 1933, two rebellious women bought a home in Virginia’s woods. Then the CIA moved in.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom