Well that's pretty darned easy to check up on, isn't it?
Did you request a ballot?
Did you turn it in?
Can you sign this?
Be aware that submitting false information to the FBI is a crime. Do you want to revise any of your previous statements?
I think Braynard is reporting some interesting data. What you are asking for is what Braynard did. They got the publicly available state data for voters that shows whether they requested an absentee ballot and whether they voted. They called some of those voters that were marked as being sent an absentee ballot but who were not marked as voted. A large number said that they had not requested an absentee ballot. Of those who said they did get a ballot, many said that they had returned it, even though their vote had not been counted according to state records. He says he has recordings of the calls.
Something isn't right. But I don't know what it is. My guess would be that it is an error on the part of Braynard. I don't think it said what state. That could make a big difference.
There is also something weird about the claim. If a high percentage of people who were recorded as being sent a ballot but not voting reported that they never received a ballot...then, what? They didn't ask for a ballot, they didn't get a ballot, they didn't vote, and they didn't have a vote counted. So, no affect on the election results. But a curiosity that could be looked into.
Also, voters who say they did request a ballot and got one and sent it in but no vote counted. Now we have narrowed down the group largely to voters who had absentee ballots rejected due to signatures, missing envelopes, and so on that Republicans have asked to disqualify ballots. So the number may not be surprising. But, if there is any error that it shows, it would be that many people mailed in valid ballots that were not counted, and we know that the mail-in ballots typically largely favored Biden. So, maybe, possibly, Biden won by more than we think, if this claim is true.
He also says he has data of people voting in different states. This comes up almost every election. It is almost always similar names to data entry errors that connect two voters who are not actually the same.
He also reports on voter registrations for addresses that are USPS, UPS, and FexEx postal centers where they list what would be that box number as an "Apt" or "Unit". He says a post office box is not allowed as an address for voter registration (which I know is typically true, because it does not establish residency). But I'm not sure about using something like a UPS store. I know homeless people will sometimes use a UPS box because they don't have a permanent residence but still need to be able to get mail. HE gives some examples, but not any numbers. The big question would be how many instances of this there are. A lot: possible mass fraud of indelible voters. A few: probably homeless people and others who use these type of services for various reasons as their address.
I am curious about the jurisdiction of the FBI in this case. Elections are run by states. Federal law for elections is mostly campaign finance and some issues of interference with elections and threatening candidates and similar stuff. This all seems like accusations of violations of state law. Also, he says he analyzed the data for swing states, but the request for his data is coming from an FBI office in....Los Angeles. Curious.
