Well look at all the riots, what has he done about them, absolutely nothing. No wonder the country is such a disaster. Need a no-nonsense, hard nosed business man to take back control for the people and drain the swamp Biden has created.
Allegations of Fraud in 2020 US Election
- Thread starter Meadmaker
- Start date
- Status
Well look at all the riots, what has he done about them, absolutely nothing. No wonder the country is such a disaster. Need a no-nonsense, hard nosed business man to take back control for the people and drain the swamp Biden has created.
Yeah but if it is fraud they want to go after as Trump and others keep saying then electoral fraud is a criminal offence at state and federal level.
bonzombiekitty
Graduate Poster
- Joined
- Jun 23, 2011
- Messages
- 1,848
That's what I was referring to when I said "at most they can see if it was counted". Some states only indicate if they received your vote, others will let you know whether or not the received vote was accepted as a valid ballot, others let you know if it was counted.
slyjoe
Illuminator
ServiceSoon
Graduate Poster
- Joined
- Oct 20, 2007
- Messages
- 1,745
I am not a statistician. I gathered the following data for the state of Michigan:
1) Party Shift from 2016 to 2020 Election by Michigan county.
2) Determined which counties used Dominion Voting Machines.
I created two different populations from this data set:
The first Population was Counties that used Dominion voting machines accompanied with their Party Shift Percent.
The second Population was Counties that used voting machines other than Dominion accompanied with their Party Shift Percent.
Shift to the Democrat Party was recorded as positive, whereas shift to the Republican Party was recorded as negative.
Next: I used the F-Test to determine if these two populations have the same standard deviation / variance. The result with a high level of certainty P.001 was that they did have the same std dev / variance.
That allowed me to utilize the two-tailed T-Test for these 2 populations with the same variance. The P result of this T-Test was .105 Which is greater than my chosen Probability threshold of .001 used to determine statistical significance.
Research Hypothesis: The mean of Pop 1 Party Shift is different from the mean of Pop 2 Party Shift.
Null Hypothesis: The mean of Pop 1 Party Shift equals the mean of Pop 2 Party Shift.
Results: Inconclusive (Which is to say the means of Party Shift for Pop 1 & Pop 2 appear to be from the same population. This lends to the belief that the mean of Political Shift votes tallied with Dominion Voting Machines is comparable to the mean of Political Shift votes tallied with voting machines other than Dominion. The lack of difference in party shift is not a reliable indicator of which voting machines were used).
1) Party Shift from 2016 to 2020 Election by Michigan county.
2) Determined which counties used Dominion Voting Machines.
I created two different populations from this data set:
The first Population was Counties that used Dominion voting machines accompanied with their Party Shift Percent.
The second Population was Counties that used voting machines other than Dominion accompanied with their Party Shift Percent.
Shift to the Democrat Party was recorded as positive, whereas shift to the Republican Party was recorded as negative.
Next: I used the F-Test to determine if these two populations have the same standard deviation / variance. The result with a high level of certainty P.001 was that they did have the same std dev / variance.
That allowed me to utilize the two-tailed T-Test for these 2 populations with the same variance. The P result of this T-Test was .105 Which is greater than my chosen Probability threshold of .001 used to determine statistical significance.
Research Hypothesis: The mean of Pop 1 Party Shift is different from the mean of Pop 2 Party Shift.
Null Hypothesis: The mean of Pop 1 Party Shift equals the mean of Pop 2 Party Shift.
Results: Inconclusive (Which is to say the means of Party Shift for Pop 1 & Pop 2 appear to be from the same population. This lends to the belief that the mean of Political Shift votes tallied with Dominion Voting Machines is comparable to the mean of Political Shift votes tallied with voting machines other than Dominion. The lack of difference in party shift is not a reliable indicator of which voting machines were used).
phiwum
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- Aug 25, 2010
- Messages
- 13,590
Checking votes can confirm that your vote was counted. Can one also confirm who it was counted for? I'm doubtful.
slyjoe
Illuminator
No. See post 2683.
Dominion’s Results Tally & Reporting User Guide
Supposedly Dominion's user manual explains, maybe as part of an innocent technical procedure, how to flip votes.
I did not read it, and I dont know which chapter that might be found in. If I see an update with more detail, I will post it.
https://www.oann.com/files/UG-RTR-UserGuide-5-11-CO.pdf
https://www.oann.com/dominion/
Supposedly Dominion's user manual explains, maybe as part of an innocent technical procedure, how to flip votes.
I did not read it, and I dont know which chapter that might be found in. If I see an update with more detail, I will post it.
https://www.oann.com/files/UG-RTR-UserGuide-5-11-CO.pdf
https://www.oann.com/dominion/
acbytesla
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- Dec 14, 2012
- Messages
- 39,487
And yet no one, ABSOLUTELY no one is doing it in court.
And for the 4th time. How do you explain that a one by one manual hand count of 5 million ballots in Georgia came up with the same margin as the Dominion election machines?
I see you don’t.
Elagabalus
Philosopher
- Joined
- Dec 23, 2013
- Messages
- 7,051
The Great Zaganza
Maledictorian
- Joined
- Aug 14, 2016
- Messages
- 29,862
Bubba, why don't you explain what happened to the Hunter Biden accusations?
Meadmaker
Unregistered
- Joined
- Apr 27, 2004
- Messages
- 29,033
For someone who is not a statistician, you seem to do pretty well with statistics.
And, this is the sort of analysis that we would be seeing if there were actual evidence of fraud, except the conclusion would be opposite. The lack of such analysis suggest to me that they've really got nothing.
autumn1971
Illuminator
This is silly. The “security protocol” is a marketing gimmick, nothing more.
Jesus, do you believe advertising is honest?
I’ve got a bridge if you’re interested.
Every court decision other than Bush v. Gore has strongly emphasized that ballots are received and counted
Robin
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- Apr 29, 2004
- Messages
- 14,971
I can't imagine a case where a court would accept evidence of a serious crime had been committed where that crime had not been reported to the police.
If I went to court to sue my neighbor and my evidence was an affidavit saying that he was a major drug dealer and they asked if this had been reported to the police and I said "Yeah nah I don't trust the police" then I highly doubt they would say "Fine, no problem, we'll proceed on the basis that your affidavit is genuine and that your neighbor is a major drug dealer."
bonzombiekitty
Graduate Poster
- Joined
- Jun 23, 2011
- Messages
- 1,848
Heck, Judge Judy won't issue judgments against a defendant if the plaintiff is accusing them of a felony. That's usually in cases where there was some sort of check fraud - she won't let the plaintiff get money unless they show they reported the crime to the police.
Yeah, I know Judge Judy isn't a real court.... but just illustrating a point.
I just took a moment to imagine Rudy standing before Judge Judy, and it was pretty funny. You can just imagine the look on her face.
It's important to never forget that the allegations of significant fraud in this election are pure gaslighting.
- Status