He wasn't the one who asked about it, ThatGuy11200 was.
I know. Maybe my comment was ambiguously phrased. I was saying that the person who posted the comment was the person to be asked about it.
He wasn't the one who asked about it, ThatGuy11200 was.
If people have questions about it or want to know what its about, then they should watch it.
If they don't want to do that, then they should just shut up about it and leave.
Wonders of Life (Prof Brian Cox)
Summary: 4.5 billion years ago, the solar system is formed, then life starts.
This seems an odd argument.
"Watch this video!"
"What's it about?"
"How dare you question me? Watch it or **** off!"
Honestly, the first Brian Cox series I tried to watch I did turn off because it wasn't telling me anything. It was supposed to be about entropy and it spent the first 10 minutes saying that the Arrow of Time existed and ran in just one direction. Then it spent the next 10 minutes saying exactly the same thing in a slightly different way. Then it spent the next 10 minutes repeating it again. Halfway through the programme and it had imparted information that could comfortably have fit into 30 seconds.
Same applies to ALL video content
Titanic (all the movies and documentaries)
Summary: Big boat hits iceberg and sinks. Many people die.
Wonders of Life (Prof Brian Cox)
Summary: 4.5 billion years ago, the solar system is formed, then life starts.
Even in pure fiction...
The Martian
Summary: Fictional astronaut gets stranded on mars, and they rescue him.
So yeah, so all that story about how Watney was supposed to have got stranded, how he did the science and the math to enable him to survive, how he and the science guys figure out how to communicate and how to get him back, all clickbait, right?
A summary might give you the bare basics of what happened, but it does not truly represent the substance of the video. The joy of video is not just the information it imparts, its the way that information is presented.
This seems an odd argument.
"Watch this video!"
"What's it about?"
"How dare you question me? Watch it or **** off!"
4 vids in and he has yet to Coverse ....
"Coverse", is that anything like covfefe?
Or which you imparted to us in 3 lines of a post. How do those people get such good production values without learning to type?
But U tube is really good for how-tos. I can throw away my 500 pounds of technical manuals, videos put them to shame.
So why didn't his bike have brakes?
“I think that we’ve got to see that a riot is the language of the unheard. And, what is it that America has failed to hear? It has failed to hear that the economic plight of the Negro poor has worsened over the last few years.”
Yup. Some time ago, I was trying to figure out what was causing an old Canon EOS model shutter to fire randomly (without pressing the shutter release, just bumping the camera would fire it). I even had the official service manual from the Canon Service facility, but it was no help. Then I found a YT video that not only explained the problem but showed exactly how to fix it, including which screws and covers to remove, thing to be careful of when dismantling it, and the exact part causing the problem.
I frequently use YT videos to help me repair old VHS tape machines for customers so that they can review their tapes before bringing them to me for transfer to digital format.
Yeah. YouTube videos - nothin' but clickbait : rolleyes :
Uggg, the usual misuse of the MLK quote about a riot being the language of the unheard. Let's remember what MLK said white America did not hear:
But of course the plight of the Black poor has not worsened over the last few years; up until covid Blacks were employed at record levels. And anyway it is obvious that MLK was finessing the issue of riots when talking to white reporters while discouraging riots to Black audiences. Non-violence was his credo, remember?
I'm really intrigued with this. If I say "on your left" three times to someone who quite obviously cannot hear me, can I run them over too, and it's their fault for not hearing me? Does this spell extend to motor vehicles? Light aircraft?
I'm really intrigued with this. If I say "on your left" three times to someone who quite obviously cannot hear me, can I run them over too, and it's their fault for not hearing me? Does this spell extend to motor vehicles? Light aircraft?
I'm really intrigued with this. If I say "on your left" three times to someone who quite obviously cannot hear me, can I run them over too, and it's their fault for not hearing me? Does this spell extend to motor vehicles? Light aircraft?
That crap torques me too. I used to walk the Mission Beach, San Diego boardwalk. Eye candy abounds, reward for walking. But the bikers acted as if they had priority over pedestrians. First time I heard "On your left", I moved left. Next time I'll just clothes line the guy. Do you think it will be OK as long as I say "On your throat" first? If he is white too, can I still claim White Privilege, or stick with Pedestrian Privilege?
Apparently it depends on the races and ethnicities of the people involved. Some things just don't have a universal principle that is independent of race.
ETA: Ninja'd by Ron Obvious. I guess it really was obvious! Ah, but was it an American Ninja or a Chinese Ninja Warrior? Was it cultural appropriation when Quentin Tarantino wrote Hattori Hanzo into one of his movies