• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Ed Corona Virus Conspiracy Theories....

Status
Not open for further replies.
Why don't you first ask yourself "How is CJ Hopkins connected to Anti-Semitism and Nazism?" before you collect some platitudes? Because I'm sure you aren't as familiar with Squeegee's broken record as I am. But might have noticed that the "such site" I linked to is that of the author himself. Well, the contact guilt Squeegee doesn't even spell out here is that one of the many sites that syndicate Hopkins' stuff all over the web is unz.com, which among a lot of stuff Squeegee thinks is fine contact guilt material also syndicated the late Andre Vltchek, who was far left of what propagandized parrots can even bring their brains to formulate. RIP btw.

You neglected to mention all of CJ Hopkins "oh noes! People are saying anti-Semitism is a bad thing" pieces. Which could be written off as cluelessness if they weren't so persistent and published on a site run by a Nazi.

But, sure, the fact that all your sources of late are conspiracy theorists associated with Nazis and anti-Semites is an irrelevant coincidence in each and every case.
 
^ You're just mad at Hopkins because he is one of the most profound writers targetting the ridiculous nonsense you have been trying to sell us for the last years. I just say "Trump and the Putin-Nazis". LOL
 
Yeah, that's it. I'm scared of the profundity of an anti-Semetic comedian who compares precautions against a pandemic with the murder of 6 million Jews.
 
Last edited:
Great post, Don. You sure put some thought into it. Doesn't read like the impulsive reaction of a called-out cultist at all.
Whereas your inability to deal rationally with expertise and insistence of parroting nutty conspiratorial ramblings is exactly is exactly that of a cultist.
:rolleyes:
 
^ You're just mad at Hopkins because he is one of the most profound writers targetting the ridiculous nonsense you have been trying to sell us for the last years. I just say "Trump and the Putin-Nazis". LOL
No he's not, he's at best a mediocre writer with delusions of grandeur. He appeals to the immature and mediocre intellects.
 
:rolleyes:
Why would anyone be interested in the rantings of a mediocre playwright? Rather than people who actually understand the subject....

That's all CE has, though.
Mediocre playwrights and third rate goal keepers.

I mean, I assume that's all he has because otherwise he's doing a **** job of trying to inform us of the error of our ways by quoting from mediocre playwrights and third rate goalies.
 
That's all CE has, though.
Mediocre playwrights and third rate goal keepers.

I mean, I assume that's all he has because otherwise he's doing a **** job of trying to inform us of the error of our ways by quoting from mediocre playwrights and third rate goalies.

I'm not really clear what CE is attempting to persuade us of ? :confused:

I mean I get that the narrative is that governments are using Covid-19 as a means to control the sheeple - but why and to what end and what are the lies ?

Is it that the Covid-19 death figures that governments are producing (and which are very embarrassing to governments of countries like the US and UK) are lies and that instead of 50,000+ people in the UK dying from Covid-19, the true number is much lower (or even zero) ? What do governments have to gain from inflating the death figures (which are a source of criticism) in order to implement lockdowns (which are another source of criticism) which causes economic harm (a third source of criticism) and causes huge budget deficits (a fourth) ?

Is it that although the death figures are accurate, the whole threat of Covid-19 is completely overblown and so 90% of the population can just get on with their lives and the other 10% have to isolate and/or just get on with the business of dying ? Ignoring the fact that no-one is really sure whether they are in the 10%, what's in it for governments to make themselves hugely unpopular by implementing lockdowns ?

Is it that actually there's nothing we can really do to tackle Covid-19 and that we should just accept that it's now endemic, that every year a small percentage of people are going to die from it and a larger percentage are going to suffer life changing and/or limiting consequences ?
 
Hey guys,

Any one know how to find out who/where is the REMDESIVIR patent owned by?

I ask because someone emailed the following. I dont know if any of it is true. Since you guys are the best I've seen at knowing stuff, I figure you could tell me if any of it is true. It may not be up to date but still...



A drug called Remdesivir, manufactured by Gilead Sciences, is now being reported as the ultimate CURE for COVID-19.

The patent for Remdesivir is currently held by China, through an agreement with Gilead™ a drug patent sharing subsidiary, called UNITAID which just happens to have an office near Wuhan, China.

Can you guess who some major financial investors in UNITAID might be? You don't know? Well, how about none other than George Soros, Bill & Melinda Gates, and the WHO (World Health Organization).


I know what you’re thinking! Just coincidence! Well, here’s another coincidence. Both, Gilead Sciences and UNITAID were financial backers of Hillary Clinton in the last election.

And another coincidence. Dr. Fauci authorized millions of American dollars to be sent to The Wuhan Institute of Virology in China, specifically for the study of Coronaviruses.

Oh, did I mention that Dr. Fauci’s wife works for Gilead Sciences? What do you think? Just coincidences! Nothing to see here folks, just keep moving.

It’s no wonder Dr. Fauci slapped down hydroxychloroquine, which is inexpensive, has been around for over 60 years with a proven safety record, even though its success rate was very favorable.

It’s amazing what you find when you just follow the money.
 
Last edited:
Hey guys,

Any one know how to find out who/where is the REMDESIVIR patent owned by?

I ask because someone emailed the following. I dont know if any of it is true. Since you guys are the best I've seen at knowing stuff, I figure you could tell me if any of it is true. It may not be up to date but still...
>pifflesnip<

No, Bubba, it's not true.
There's this thing called "Google", on another thing called "the internet". You can find information on it. Try it- it's quite useful.

https://eu.usatoday.com/story/news/...ent-covid-19-treatment-remdesivir/5194192002/
 
Hang on a mo: is Bubba now objecting to good ol' capitalists making money from the well-established patent system? Merely hours after describing some (to most Europeans - and I'm including UK-ians) fairly standard social good, public protection, finacial re-distribution, equality and the like ideas as being extreme left?

I thought making money in any way you can was The Good Ol' American Way?
 
Hey guys,

Any one know how to find out who/where is the REMDESIVIR patent owned by?

I ask because someone emailed the following. I dont know if any of it is true. Since you guys are the best I've seen at knowing stuff, I figure you could tell me if any of it is true. It may not be up to date but still...



A drug called Remdesivir, manufactured by Gilead Sciences, is now being reported as the ultimate CURE for COVID-19.

Honestly, you can simply stop right here. Remdesivir is NOT being reported as the ultimate cure for COVID-19 - and NEVER was. Going further, there has been some decent evidence that it's shortened hospital stays, but not that it affects mortality in the end.

To poke at the HCQ bit later, HCQ's main claim to fame is that Fox hyped a comically worthless tiny study HARD (seriously, when people in the tiny study died or needed to be put on a ventilator, they were counted as no longer being able to use HCQ and so removed from the final numbers, which dramatically skewed the results) and politicized it. What followed with HCQ was pretty much what is to be expected after Fox politicized it and made it a right wing idol.
 
Last edited:
Honestly, you can simply stop right here. Remdesivir is NOT being reported as the ultimate cure for COVID-19 - and NEVER was. Going further, there has been some decent evidence that it's shortened hospital stays, but not that it affects mortality in the end.

To poke at the HCQ bit later, HCQ's main claim to fame is that Fox hyped a comically worthless tiny study HARD (seriously, when people in the tiny study died or needed to be put on a ventilator, they were counted as no longer being able to use HCQ and so removed from the final numbers, which dramatically skewed the results) and politicized it. What followed with HCQ was pretty much what is to be expected after Fox politicized it and made it a right wing idol.


Its a little more than that.

100+ MDs in 22 medical studies worldwide, and over eight hundred American doctors agree it works in early stage covid cases.

Fauci admitted it worked for corona in 2005. He is in on the vaccine business, and his wife, with Bill Gates. Period.
 
by Bubba View Post

Fauci admitted it worked for corona in 2005.


Er, what?

Curious? you might wanna ask yourself how it is you dont know, but I do know.

I might have the year wrong, but Biden's hero Fauci was Mr NIH when they announced this.

IIRC, HCQ was found effective on SARS CoV, both as a prophylactic, and in early stage cases.

Its out there. Dont take my word for it. Trusting google is also not recommended, in case you havent seen how they hide stuff. They definitely do.


This means, of course, that Dr. Fauci (pictured at right) has known for 15 years that chloroquine and it’s even milder derivative hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) will not only treat a current case of coronavirus (“therapeutic”) but prevent future cases (“prophylactic”). So HCQ functions as both a cure and a vaccine. In other words, it’s a wonder drug for coronavirus. Said Dr. Fauci’s NIH in 2005, “concentrations of 10 μM completely abolished SARS-CoV infection.” Fauci’s researchers add, “chloroquine can effectively reduce the establishment of infection and spread of SARS-CoV.”

https://onenewsnow.com/perspectives...i-knew-about-hcq-in-2005-nobody-needed-to-die

Bonus items:

Not confirmed, but critics claim these 22 worldwide studies were not placebo controlled.

Maybe a hundred doctors names are on these studies...done this year...From CDC, Korea, US, China, France, Mt Sinai, Italy, Belgium, India...all studies conducted since March 2020.




https://docs.google.com/document/d/1545C_dJWMIAgqeLEsfo2U8Kq5WprDuARXrJl6N1aDjY/preview

Not to mention the 800+ Frontline Doctors (censored by MSM, Dorsey, and Zuckerberg) demanding patients be allowed to use safe cheap proven HCQ.
 
Last edited:
Er, what?


Your sources never told you? Why trust them? Fire them.



Results
Preinfection chloroquine treatment renders Vero E6 cells refractory to SARS-CoV infection

In order to investigate if chloroquine might prevent SARS-CoV infection, permissive Vero E6 cells [1] were pretreated with various concentrations of chloroquine (0.1–10 μM) for 20–24 h prior to virus infection. Cells were then infected with SARS-CoV, and virus antigens were visualized by indirect immunofluorescence as described in Materials and Methods. Microscopic examination (Fig. ​(Fig.1A)1A) of the control cells (untreated, infected) revealed extensive SARS-CoV-specific immunostaining of the monolayer. A dose-dependant decrease in virus antigen-positive cells was observed starting at 0.1 μM chloroquine, and concentrations of 10 μM completely abolished SARS-CoV infection. For quantitative purposes, we counted the number of cells stained positive from three random locations on a slide. The average number of positively stained control cells was scored as 100% and was compared with the number of positive cells observed under various chloroquine concentrations (Fig. ​(Fig.1B).1B). Pretreatment with 0.1, 1, and 10 μM chloroquine reduced infectivity by 28%, 53%, and 100%, respectively. Reproducible results were obtained from three independent experiments. These data demonstrated that pretreatment of Vero E6 cells with chloroquine rendered these cells refractory to SARS-CoV infection.


https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1232869/
 
Last edited:
IIRC, HCQ was found effective on SARS CoV, both as a prophylactic, and in early stage cases.

So what? That's SARS, not covid-19.

Hydroxychoroquine has been tested thoroughly, to say the least, and has not been shown to be an effective treatment for covid-19.
 
Curious? you might wanna ask yourself how it is you dont know, but I do know.

I might have the year wrong, but he was Mr NIH when they did announced this.

IIRC, HCQ was found effective on SARS CoV, both as a prophylactic, and in early stage cases.

Its out there. Dont take my word for it. Trusting google is also not recommended, in case you havent seen how they hide stuff. They definitely do.




Bonus items:

Not confirmed, but critics claim these 22 worldwide studies were not placebo controlled.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1545C_dJWMIAgqeLEsfo2U8Kq5WprDuARXrJl6N1aDjY/preview

Not to mention the 800+ Frontline Doctors (censored by MSM, Dorsey, and Zuckerberg) demanding patients be allowed to use safe cheap proven HCQ.
I'll take the research done specifically on SARS-CoV-2 over assumptions that something that was effective for SARS-CoV will be effective.

What goddamn quack came up with this free association ********?
 
Question:

When did the concept/claim of secretive planning of a future "Plandemic" and lockdowns first appear on the internet?
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom