Once the west is all counted, I expect it'll be a lot higher for Biden. I'm curious what the record is for total popular vote in the US.
2008. 131,313,820 votes cast.
Once the west is all counted, I expect it'll be a lot higher for Biden. I'm curious what the record is for total popular vote in the US.
The gap in Pennsylvania seem to be to too big for Biden at 92% counted.
And as bonus if Nevada goes Biden FOX will either have to rescind calling Arizona for him or declare Biden President elect.![]()
It's been on the news today, both Biden AND Trump have shattered all previous vote totals. Although, I don't think it's the highest percentage of the registered voters total of some past election (70% vs 75%?). Someone will bother to provide the correct stats in no time, I'm sure.
2008. 131,313,820 votes cast.
PA is within reach for Biden. Trump had a 700K lead on Tuesday night, and now it's around 110K and shrinking steadily. The PA governor predicted Biden will end up with better than 100K lead when all is done.
On what basis do you make this claim?
I and others have shown the math in this thread. He only needs to get 61% of the remaining votes to take the lead. So far, in the updates posted today, he has been getting 73% of the vote. If he maintains that, he blows right by. No guarantee that he will maintain that pace, but what is the basis for the assertion that he won't continue well ahead?
How many % were counted when he had the 700K lead?
Just by looking at the chart, it looks like the trend is more stagnant lately.
Fox News is generally pretty good with election coverage.
**** Nate Silver.
This is all insane. Biden is up by more than 3 million votes. It should be over already.
Okay seriously what do people have against Nate Silver? I'm honestly asking.
Okay seriously what do people have against Nate Silver? I'm honestly asking.
How many % were counted when he had the 700K lead?
Just by looking at the chart, it looks like the trend is more stagnant lately.
Okay seriously what do people have against Nate Silver? I'm honestly asking.
Correct. The popular vote should decide presidential elections, and (if really needed) another statistical advantage for low-population states should be created.
Okay seriously what do people have against Nate Silver? I'm honestly asking.
I don't follow FiveThirtyEight closely but it has been *very* cautious as far as I can tell ... while it's pretty clear IMO that polling error is in play, they have played it very straight so far, not calling states, just reporting on it and referring to ABC News projections as its lead indicator.
Sheeesh. It's just a joke.
Although, putting my pontificating hat on, the idea that Nate Silver would demand a retraction AND expect to get it from Fox News did cause me to LOL.