• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Cont: Biden for President? Pt 2

Status
Not open for further replies.
If those road warriors down in Texas intimidated some Biden workers enough to cancel events, that's bad enough behavior to condemn, and for the law to pursue.

Take note that Orange Benito and his helpers are cackling over it. They're cheering on more goonish behavior, and I fear that we'll see dire things in the next several months.

Yes, fascist things, Klan things.
 
Again pretty much all cities are liberal and all rural areas are conservative. Almost without exception the Red State / Blue State divide is over simplified nonsense. America is a islands of high population blue in a sea of low population red.

Need proof of this? California had the 3rd most votes for Donald Trump in 2016, behind only Texas and Florida. Texas had the 4th most votes for Hillary Clinton.

Trump barely carried any large cities. Jacksonville Fl, Houston, Cincinnati, Nashville, and Pittsburg are about it. And outside of some scattered in the extreme Northeast Hillary Clinton didn't win that many rural areas.

That's why I don't get how this "Imminent Civil War" we're supposed to be having is going to work. There's no Mason-Dixon line anymore. What are we going to do break off into a separate country once you have 3 or more bars of cell phone coverage?
 
Last edited:
Again pretty much all cities are liberal and all rural areas are conservative. Almost without exception the Red State / Blue State divide is over simplified nonsense. America is a islands of high population blue in a sea of low population red.

Need proof of this? California had the 3rd most votes for Donald Trump in 2016, behind only Texas and Florida. Texas had the 4th most votes for Hillary Clinton.

Trump barely carried any large cities. Jacksonville Fl, Houston, Cincinnati, Nashville, and Pittsburg are about it. And outside of some scattered in the extreme Northeast Hillary Clinton didn't win that many rural areas.

That's why I don't get how this "Imminent Civil War" we're supposed to be having is going to work. There's no Mason-Dixon line anymore. What are we going to do break off into a separate country once you have 3 or more bars of cell phone coverage?

That's been true almost everywhere I have traveled. Mending the rural urban divide in my view is almost the best thing we can do for this country.
 
That's been true almost everywhere I have traveled. Mending the rural urban divide in my view is almost the best thing we can do for this country.

Well the only way to do that is to give the rural areas of this country something to do other than "Hurry and die off faster and please don't make a fuss while doing it" and neither the Left nor Right has any desire or plan for that.

The Right needs the rural areas angry and desperate so they can aim that anger and desperation at the Left long enough for them to rig the system enough that they'll be self-sustaining after their base dies off.

The Left has either written them all off as backwoods racists (which is a bad political tactic even if it's 100% true so nobody @ me) and on the rare occasions they present some plan to save the rural areas it's laughable in how naive and out of touch it is. And all of the Left's cherished pet issues that have a practical effect and aren't purely philosophical only "work" in dense urban areas.
 
Last edited:
....
Need proof of this? California had the 3rd most votes for Donald Trump in 2016, behind only Texas and Florida. Texas had the 4th most votes for Hillary Clinton.
....

This is the simplest argument for an end to the electoral college. Votes for Trump in California didn't really count, and neither did Clinton votes in Texas. It makes no sense that a few votes in a few states should decide the election.
 
Well the only way to do that is to give the rural areas of this country something to do other than "Hurry and die off faster and please don't make a fuss while doing it" and neither the Left nor Right has any desire or plan for that.
.....

That might be an argument for a national minimum income. Sure, people in rural areas are hurting. So are a lot of people in urban areas who don't have advanced educations and secure jobs. We ultimately will reach a point where there won't be enough decent work to go around, and the haves will have to share more with the have-nots.
 
Well the only way to do that is to give the rural areas of this country something to do other than "Hurry and die off faster and please don't make a fuss while doing it" and neither the Left nor Right has any desire or plan for that.

The Right needs the rural areas angry and desperate so they can aim that anger and desperation at the Left long enough for them to rig the system enough that they'll be self-sustaining after their base dies off.

The Left has either written them all off as backwoods racists (which is a bad political tactic even if it's 100% true so nobody @ me) and on the rare occasions they present some plan to save the rural areas it's laughable in how naive and out of touch it is an all of the Left's cherished pet issues that have a practical effect and aren't purely philosophical only "work" in dense urban areas.

It's not a simple act, but I refuse to see the problem as intractable.
 
It's not a simple act, but I refuse to see the problem as intractable.

Intractable? No, hardly.

But "Difficult" crossed with "No motivation for anyone to actually fix it" is a poor place to start trying to come up with a solution.

And let's be real here, there's going to be a huge push to "punish" the rural areas for the sin of electing Trump coming from many circles. The morality of this is a discussion hardly worth even trying to have, but on a purely political level if the rural area's downward trend continues, even if we defeat Trump we will deal with another version of him sooner rather than later.

Even if Biden and the Dems pull off the most statistically unlikely Blue Wave dream of win on Tuesday the ~40% of Americans who supported Trump aren't going away and 40% of an electorate is "Too Big to Fail" politically.
 
That's why I don't get how this "Imminent Civil War" we're supposed to be having is going to work. There's no Mason-Dixon line anymore. What are we going to do break off into a separate country once you have 3 or more bars of cell phone coverage?

There was already thread about it not so long ago. Conclusion was that if anything happens, it will look very differently than first civil war.

More like Troubles in Ireland - constant low-level violence with flareups, heavy police and military presence. Persecution, beatings, killings, law enforcement cooperating with bandits of correct stripe (actually, according to antifas here they already do that), paramilitary attacks and bombings, you know, entire shebang.

For me, this kind of scenario is pretty plausible during and after rethuglicans sets up their nice little right-wing authoritarian state in USA.
 
That might be an argument for a national minimum income. Sure, people in rural areas are hurting. So are a lot of people in urban areas who don't have advanced educations and secure jobs. We ultimately will reach a point where there won't be enough decent work to go around, and the haves will have to share more with the have-nots.

This has been true for decades. Every year we need less workers. Fewer people are required to farm, make or construct anything. But that is a blessing and a curse. It's a blessing for the haves. They get a larger pool of labor they can pay less.

But it's a curse because fewer people will have the resources to create a demand for their products.

It's a huge problem that is getting worse.

I'm a believer that instead of a universal income, we create and expand public works. There are projects nationwide that should be done. We need bridges, roads, subways and more. We could also pay people to visit the elderly, infirm and handicapped. I'm a huge believer in work. I think everyone should work. If only part time. We need to contribute to each other. Not just for their sake but for our own.
 
Intractable? No, hardly.

But "Difficult" crossed with "No motivation for anyone to actually fix it" is a poor place to start trying to come up with a solution.

And let's be real here, there's going to be a huge push to "punish" the rural areas for the sin of electing Trump coming from many circles. The morality of this is a discussion hardly worth even trying to have, but on a purely political level if the rural area's downward trend continues, even if we defeat Trump we will deal with another version of him sooner rather than later.

Even if Biden and the Dems pull off the most statistically unlikely Blue Wave dream of win on Tuesday the ~40% of Americans who supported Trump aren't going away and 40% of an electorate is "Too Big to Fail" politically.

I'm not sure that is true. I also believe it would be a mistake.
 
And so what? And Susan Rosenberg wasn't pardoned. Her sentence was commuted after she spent 16 years in prison. She was convicted of possession of explosives, not the use of them. She was sentenced to 58 years, a prison term 16 times the national average for such an offense. I thought Christians believed in forgiveness and grace?

"And so what"? Facts matter. Bubba couldn't even get the two most basic facts straight.
 
Austin is actually liberal. And it's known for its blues. Wish I lived there when Stevie Ray Vaughn was alive.

Yes, my 'niece' (daughter of my best friend whom I've known since birth) lives there. But it's still a blue island in a sea of Texas red No thanks.
'
 
Well the only way to do that is to give the rural areas of this country something to do other than "Hurry and die off faster and please don't make a fuss while doing it" and neither the Left nor Right has any desire or plan for that.

The Right needs the rural areas angry and desperate so they can aim that anger and desperation at the Left long enough for them to rig the system enough that they'll be self-sustaining after their base dies off.

The Left has either written them all off as backwoods racists (which is a bad political tactic even if it's 100% true so nobody @ me) and on the rare occasions they present some plan to save the rural areas it's laughable in how naive and out of touch it is. And all of the Left's cherished pet issues that have a practical effect and aren't purely philosophical only "work" in dense urban areas.
Hillary Clinton had a plan. She acknowledged the problems that rural areas were facing, and addressed them head-on. Coal is dying. Fracking is next in line. Giant American assembly lines aren't coming back from the dead. Rural areas have too many people to support on the remaining economic vehicles, so the only solution is retraining people into the service and tech industries to have skills that will be needed and do pay.

But instead of facing reality those people voted overwhelmingly for the guy who said he was going to wave his dick around and magic the black right back into their lungs.
 
JoeMorgue's failure of memory in this aspect is deliberate revision of history on the part of the GOP. Lacking any plans or substance of their own, their only possible defense is to constantly tell people that it's their political opponents who have nothing, and never did really. Every word used to describe the politics or the people is simply picked up and flung back because the meanings of the words don't matter anymore, only that they are being used.
 
Hillary Clinton had a plan. She acknowledged the problems that rural areas were facing, and addressed them head-on. Coal is dying. Fracking is next in line. Giant American assembly lines aren't coming back from the dead. Rural areas have too many people to support on the remaining economic vehicles, so the only solution is retraining people into the service and tech industries to have skills that will be needed and do pay.

And yes the completely logical and not all insane "You there, yes you who has spent the last 30 years on the same position on Canyanaro assembly line, just learn to code and compete with 20 year olds straight out of college." *Wipes hands* "Well that takes care of that" plan.

If you're going to hire the guy in Lickspittle South Dakota to code for you, you might as well hire the guy in India to do it for 1/25th the cost.

Hillary Clinton's "Well it would be nice if this happened" was not the same thing as a plan.

There's a reason "Well just learn to code" morphed into a troll term.

And "service jobs" are even more pie in the sky. Service jobs scale hard. A town of 500 people can not support a self-sustaining service sector the way an area with a denser population density can. With 5 million people you get a lot of jobs out supporting the people, you can't with 500 hundred.

And even if all of that is 100% wrong, Trump is proof that that's not what people want so we're going to have to come up with another plan.are
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom