Minoosh
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- Jul 15, 2011
- Messages
- 12,772
How do you know Trump wasn't told about this attempt?Sure, but they then apparently decided not to tell him about this actual attempt.
How do you know Trump wasn't told about this attempt?Sure, but they then apparently decided not to tell him about this actual attempt.
Whether Trump acts appropriately on it doesn't mean that the FBI should sit on it. If they inform him and he does nothing, that's on him. If they don't inform him, or Biden, then that's on them.Actually, it's been reported that Trump's aggression on hearing negative reports on Russia led to him being verbally briefed less and less on intelligence matters related to Russia. The material was still included in the written briefings, but it's long been reported that he doesn't have the attention span to actually read those.
So, yeah, when it comes to any piece of information about Russia it's entirely credible that Trump hasn't been informed of it.
Could be. If he was, then I think we should be told. Given how much people leak against him, that doesn't seem likely to me. It seems really foolish of him to start pushing the Justice Department and the FBI for an explanation if he was told.How do you know Trump wasn't told about this attempt?
Sure, but they then apparently decided not to tell him about this actual attempt. If I know specifically that your neighbour is a homicidal maniac, has found the spare key to your house and has been muttering about killing you.... giving you a generalized warning that there are a lot of dangerous people about and your wife shouldn't leave the key under the mat is wilfully non-specific.
This isn't a response to what I said in my post. Are you responding to a different post?Utter bull **** and continued evidence that you're ready to ignore every fact you find inconvenient.
The sources are compromised, the story of the information acquisition makes no sense, and the [mis]information has not been authenticated.
Wait a sec. You really believe the public at large should be briefed on all warnings the president receives? You mean in real time, or later? You don't necessarily announce publicly every detail of an investigation as it develops.Could be. If he was, then I think we should be told.
I agree it seems foolish. I think really he is telegraphing something to Barr, who for some reason is not quite willing to pull indictments out of his ass at Trump's behest.It seems really foolish of him to start pushing the Justice Department and the FBI for an explanation if he was told.
No, of course not. If at this point in the game Trump is using these emails to try to discredit Biden and claiming he didn't know they were fake, when in fact he was told about it and was told that the emails on the laptop were forged.... then I want to know.Wait a sec. You really believe the public at large should be briefed on all warnings the president receives? You mean in real time, or later? You don't necessarily announce publicly every detail of an investigation as it develops.
That again would be shocking, that the emails have already been shown to be fake and we aren't being told. Why wouldn't Biden say something? It would be a terrific bit of corruption to take into the last days of the election.I have a hunch both men were told, but that's all it is.
I think indictments are a little way off what ever is going on. Trump is sticking his neck way out here..... He's making it much easier for the FBI to screw him if that's what the information they have does.I agree it seems foolish. I think really he is telegraphing something to Barr, who for some reason is not quite willing to pull indictments out of his ass at Trump's behest.
It's hard to credit that something this laughable is the actual October Surprise. Misdirection, surely?Utter bull **** and continued evidence that you're ready to ignore every fact you find inconvenient.
The sources are compromised, the story of the information acquisition makes no sense, and the [mis]information has not been authenticated.
That does seem likely, doesn't it?It's hard to credit that something this laughable is the actual October Surprise. Misdirection, surely?
They very clearly brief people about ongoing investigations. They briefed Trump and Obama about the Steele dossier while that was an ongoing investigation. We've been hearing about them briefing Obama about Flynn before that became an active investigation.
The way we are talking about this, it's like one of those nature documentaries where some innocent baby gazelle is about to be killed by a pack of hyenas and the film crew do nothing because they have vowed not to interfere in the natural order. I don't believe the FBI takes that same approach with foreign election interference.
As has been explained 3 or 4 times now, the emails could possibly implicate Joe Biden receiving money through his son.
Do you just believe things because you're told? Or would you like to see evidence?
https://www.politifact.com/factchec...hecking-unproven-claims-about-hunter-biden-a/"Drugs, underage obsessions, power deals," she said in the post. "Druggie Hunter makes Anthony Weiner's down under selfie addiction look normal."
The tweet, which was shared more than 53,000 times, then made its way to 4chan, where users anonymously speculated that it meant the FBI was investigating Hunter Biden. One user posing as Rion affirmed that speculation, saying the hard drive contained child pornography.
The real Rion tweeted Oct. 16 that she did not write the posts.
"For the record: I do not post on chat forums," she wrote. "I understand there are hoaxers posing as me."
By Sunday, the conspiracy theory had made its way to Fox News. "Sunday Morning Futures" host Maria Bartiromo noted that a name written on the back of a federal subpoena included in the Post’s story appears to belong to Joshua Wilson, an FBI agent who has worked on child pornography cases.
"Connect the dots: If an FBI agent is working on child pornography issues for five years, why is he subpoenaing the laptop of Hunter Biden? Is there a connection here?" Bartiromo asked Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis.
Our ruling
Several Facebook posts claim "Hunter Biden had 25,000 pics of him torturing and raping children under age 10 in China on his laptop."
There is no evidence to support that.
Did I miss it? I'm not seeing any widespread claim that the emails are fake.No, of course not. If at this point in the game Trump is using these emails to try to discredit Biden and claiming he didn't know they were fake, when in fact he was told about it and was told that the emails on the laptop were forged.... then I want to know.
Why would anyone bother making that up? It's a perfectly ordinary email and the Biden campaign has said it has no official record of such a meeting but that it could have happened.The main email highlighted by the Post is an April 2015 message that it said was sent to Hunter Biden by Vadym Pozharskyi, an adviser to Burisma’s board. In it, he thanks the younger Biden “for inviting me to DC and giving an opportunity to meet your father and spent (sic) some time together. It’s realty (sic) an honor and pleasure.”
Who's job is it to tell us? And again, who says they're fake?That again would be shocking, that the emails have already been shown to be fake and we aren't being told.
He has said something.Why wouldn't Biden say something?
What would the news be? Donald Trump is corrupt?It would be a terrific bit of corruption to take into the last days of the election.
You'd think he could have done better if he wanted to make something up.Trump getting Giuliani to fake an email and slander an opponents son is pretty tame for this administration honestly. Doing it in the most stupidly ham handed way possible is expected
You'd think he could have done better if he wanted to make something up.
"Major Garrett
@MajorCBS
Via
@ClareHymes22
@CBSNews
The FBI & DOJ concur with DNI Ratcliffe’s assessment that Hunter Biden's laptop and the emails in question were not part of a Russian disinformation campaign. FBI does has possession of the Hunter Biden laptop in question.
@DNI_Ratcliffe
@FBI"