Wasn't it 30% in 2016?
Also, I'd think they've improved their algorithms and such.
Possibly, I have 23% stuck in my brain.
Maybe that was from a few days before the election
Wasn't it 30% in 2016?
Also, I'd think they've improved their algorithms and such.
You're tarnishing your stellar record as a pundit here. The odds are 0%, rounded.
I think Trump will lose in nov, despite all authoritarian tactics, voting suppression, crippling post office and all of that typical rethuglicanery - because he will be as competent campaigning as in any other of his failtastic ventures.
Worst enemy of Trump is Trump.
(of course, that does not mean one can be complacent)
FiveThirtyEight is currently giving President Trump a 27% chance of winning the election in 2020.
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2020-election-forecast/
In other words, a greater chance than in 2016.
Be motivated to vote Democrats, be very motivated to vote![]()
FiveThirtyEight is currently giving President Trump a 27% chance of winning the election in 2020.
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2020-election-forecast/
In other words, a greater chance than in 2016.
Be motivated to vote Democrats, be very motivated to vote![]()
Fortunately people will be far less likely to stay home this time. Both because they won't take victory for granted this time, and because everyone has seen Trump for what he is.
Wasn't it 30% in 2016?
Also, I'd think they've improved their algorithms and such.
But 40+% of the voters still like what they see. You can be sure they won't stay home. And in 2016 Trump couldn't sabotage the Post Office, send troops wherever he wants and announce a covid cure a week before the election. Be afraid. Be very afraid.
The popular vote for Trump is very unlikely to increase, but that is not relevant. The USA’s weird election system requires the popular vote for a candidate to be concentrated in very specific states in order to elect a president. Who the majority of citizens want to see as their president does not matter.
....
The popular vote for Trump is very unlikely to increase, but that is not relevant. The USA’s weird election system requires the popular vote for a candidate to be concentrated in very specific states in order to elect a president. Who the majority of citizens want to see as their president does not matter.
Note: this is assuming 2 parties and 2 candidates, which is another USA peculiarity.
Because California and New York are solidly blue, Biden has an advantage this year. Most of the ruby red states are smaller and have fewer electoral votes. Trump pretty much has to win all the toss ups. Biden has several maps to 270 where Trump not only has to win ALL the toss-up states but flip some combination of Minnesota, Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania.
Yeah, we all get that. And Trump is competitive, if not winning, in those few swing states.
They have. If you look into their detailed explanation, the odds are currently the same but for very different reasons. In 2016, the polls were just that close on Election Day. In 2020, the polls are nowhere near that close, but they come with a big dollop of extra uncertainty because that's what they're using to model the effects of the pandemic and GOP election tampering and Trump's inevitable chuckledickery until and after then.Also, I'd think they've improved their algorithms and such.
And he did in 2016, when the Democrats had the same advantages. Be afraid, be very afraid.
And his party lost state houses in some of those and nearly all of the suburban districts in 2018.