• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

JFK Conspiracy Theories VII: Late November back in '63...

Status
Not open for further replies.
In a new interview with The Hollywood Reporter's 'Awards Chatter' podcast tied to the publication of his acclaimed new memoir Gassing the Light: ...
 
Better Without The Bitter

The two best films about high profile murder cases (e.g., JFK and Zodiac) were directed by two individuals (e.g., Oliver Stone and David Fincher) who bragged about how each film's screenplay was based on documented (e.g., CIA, FBI, Police Files) fact. Unfortunately, it only takes about 45 minutes of research/fact-checking to realize that both directors appear to have used the case files as expensive toilet paper. In essence, both directors flaunted the better, but ignored the bitter.

http://www.macdonaldcasefacts.com
 
Last edited:
Oliver, Oliver, Oliver

Speaking of Oliver Stone, he appears to have gotten a second wind in regards to the JFK Case. In the past 10 months, he has given several interviews where he regurgitates the same debunked nonsense he put forth in both his 1991 film and his subsequent speaking tour. Stone also remains hypersensitive to any critiques of his flawed research and/or conclusions.
 
JTF said:
Speaking of Oliver Stone, he appears to have gotten a second wind in regards to the JFK Case. In the past 10 months, he has given several interviews where he regurgitates the same debunked nonsense he put forth in both his 1991 film and his subsequent speaking tour. Stone also remains hypersensitive to any critiques of his flawed research and/or conclusions.
Click to expand...

That's no shock.

I'm surprised he hasn't gone in Kubrick's "Eyes Wide Shut" direction with his movies.
 
No Other said:
Those same people think this forum is objective and willing to discuss positions without ignoring opposing viewpoints.
Click to expand...

It's not about ignoring opposing viewpoints, it's about separating the facts from speculation and lies. The problem with the world of JFK-CTs is that they've become dogmatic fantasies that serve as a foundation for a world view that believes there is a conspiracy behind everything.

In this fantasy world the facts are irrelevant due to the thesis that says, "If the government lied about X,Y.& Z then it must also have lied about A,B, & C". This thinking handicaps the believers in CT from the beginning sending them down multiple rabbit holes at once searching for a more acceptable version of the truth that is in alignment with their own.
 
No Other said:
Those same people think this forum is objective and willing to discuss positions without ignoring opposing viewpoints.
Click to expand...

I'd love if you could debate without ignoring opposing viewpoints.

When do you intend to start?

Here's just five examples over a period of a few days when you were a more active poster here of you raising an issue just to drop it after the actual facts of the case were posted (I could cite several dozen more) :

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=11195201&postcount=733

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=11195278&postcount=734

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=11203733&postcount=741

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=11203942&postcount=742

And of course, there's this memorable one where you tried to lecture me on the different between a magazine housing and a trigger guard, not understanding what Oswald's Mannlicher Carcano even looked like, apparently:
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=11206276&postcount=747

Do you think we forgot about your prior arguments that you never supported with evidence and went nowhere? And ignored the opposing viewpoints?

I summarized where we ended up here:
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=11225373&postcount=768
Originally Posted by No Other
I have made comments and you and others have not been successful in rebutting them...
Click to expand...


Originally Posted by HSienzant
Did I overlook one?

Most of your comments have been rebutted by me - with, in many cases, detailed citations and quotations from the evidence. I'm still awaiting your responses to those rebuttal arguments.
Click to expand...

Hank
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom