Split Thread "Pizzagate" and images of triangles

Er, you omitted to mention Jimmy Savile managed to reach the age of 84, two days shy of his 85th birthday without once ever having his collar felt for the child abuse (of really young children) with an estimate of 484 victims. At least.

Has it ever occurred to you his 'charitable good works' gave him free access to children's hospital wards?

And this has what to do with Epstein having a weird portrait of Clinton, or giving donations to Gates's foundation?
 
Vixen said
Sorry? You didn't know Clinton visited Little St James at least 26 times, as per the Lolita Express log book? That Epstein has a large painting of Bill Clinton in a blue dress and red stilettos?


Of all those things, the only one I knew was Clinton's reputation. The painting thing is weird but it's unclear what inference I should draw from it. Do you have any context or is that it?

You tell us Clinton and Gates each visited Epstein's holiday island several times. And? Is that the limit of the innuendo and we just let our imagination lead us the rest of the way?

By telling us Epstein made vast contributions to the Gates Foundation are you trying to tell us he had a positive, charitable side as well as a criminal side?


Monica Lewinsky hasn't washed her blue dress since that time in the Oval Office.
 
And accusing high profile people of vile crimes on the flimsiest of fabricated pretexts is..?


Because the collection of circumstantial facts in that image supports your best shot at identifying some of the 1-5% pedos known to exist in any group.

It is probably higher in that group, what with privilege and traditional castle life and all.

"Spotlight" and those naughty protected Boston Priests ....for example.

Put that in a search engine.
 
Digital Soldiering, Sir!

True.

The anons are the ones that mostly dig up and report the factual info. Connections mostly, as far as I can tell.

The media wont do it, except for such as Amy Rorbach who "had everything on Epstein, including Clintons, 3 years before it broke, it got squashed by her ABC management"
 
Last edited:
Because the collection of circumstantial facts in that image supports your best shot at identifying some of the 1-5% pedos known to exist in any group.



"the 1-5% pedos known to exist in any group". So Bubba is Q going after those pedos in the that group called Republicans?
 
Because the collection of circumstantial facts in that image supports your best shot at identifying some of the 1-5% pedos known to exist in any group.

That seems a very low bar of evidence to accuse someone of a very heinous crime.
 
"the 1-5% pedos known to exist in any group". So Bubba is Q going after those pedos in the that group called Republicans?
Well they could start with Strom Thurmond, Mark Foley, Dennis Hastert, Jim Jordan, Roy Moore.....


I heard that, for conspiracy theorists on the internet, like 73% of them are pedophiles.
Well Richard Price, Leigh McMillan, Milo Yiannopoulos...
 
I heard that, for conspiracy theorists on the internet, like 73% of them are pedophiles.

That is flat out hyperbole.

Nevertheless, one must pause to wonder why it is that pedophilia is so attractive to them (the various CT wingnuts of this world).

As a part-time counsellor, I have seen more of it than I care to think about. I am moved to wonder if it is not simple jealousy. If the wealthy can get away with it, why cannot they?

Oftentimes, one discovers that the perp wishes they had the wealth and power to fulfil their inner fantasy and does it anyway in the belief they will never be found out. B. Smyth is a prime example.
 
That is flat out hyperbole.

Nevertheless, one must pause to wonder why it is that pedophilia is so attractive to them (the various CT wingnuts of this world).

As a part-time counsellor, I have seen more of it than I care to think about. I am moved to wonder if it is not simple jealousy. If the wealthy can get away with it, why cannot they?
Oftentimes, one discovers that the perp wishes they had the wealth and power to fulfil their inner fantasy and does it anyway in the belief they will never be found out. B. Smyth is a prime example.



Probably in some cases, but outrage is what you'll see in comments.

Realize CTs were tracking crooks and liars long before this became a thing. Uncovering pedophiles in power is part of that process, and apparently an inevitable outcome, the closer the process gets to the top. Ask a detective how that works, whether it is pedophiles or drug running.

Didnt you ask this before? Someone did.

My answer was that when looking at corruption in high places, seeing pedophiles is a subset. It comes with the territory.

For example:

Watching Clintons for all kinds of allegations, you'll notice how many women accuse him of rape, groping, some while in White House. Then you'll see him in Epstein's Lolita Express flight log 2 dozen times, and pictured with some of Jeffrey and Ghislaine's young friends.

All public record now. Why hasnt he at least been picked up for questioning? The locals around St. James Island know. They call it Orgy Island.

While following that you'll note linkage to associated creepy crawlies in power. Who was it that memorably said: "Its a big club and you aint in it.?"

An agency in national security or FBI would dutifully follow them and their connections, epecially after Epstein's invetigation and conviction, considering elements like foreign players, blackmail possibilities, etc. Cell phone location tracking must be rich for bundling them all up, not to mention the eavesdropping. Imagine what law enforcement knows about them.


(George Carlin said it)
 
Probably in some cases, but outrage is what you'll see in comments.
Sure, outrage from comfy cretins who do not experience it on the front line. Comfy to cast crap from the couch in front of the TV, right?

Realize CTs were tracking crooks and liars long before this became a thing.
False. This was a "thing" long before the clueless Q cranks glommed onto it. How do I know that? Because I was part of the team that researched many of the actual perps in actual cases.

Q and you are full of it.

Uncovering pedophiles in power is part of that process,
And I have done that. But you have not. That merely illustrates how inefectual you really are. I took real action and achieved real results. I am still involved in supporting the victims of such abuse.

And what did you do? Mental masturbation and that is it. There you stopped after gratifying yourself.

and apparently an inevitable outcome, the closer the process gets to the top.
That is a problem. You want the whole thing to conform to your crank narrative and see nothing outside of that imagined narrative. I cannot fix your blindness. I cannot make you not be part of the problem. I cannot make you stop blaming the victims.

Only you can do that and only if you want to do so. And you clearly do not.

Ask a detective how that works, whether it is pedophiles or drug running.
Either of those will tell you how abjectly wrong you are

Didnt you ask this before? Someone did.
Right. MMAke crap up, why not.

My answer was that when looking at corruption in high places, seeing pedophiles is a subset. It comes with the territory.
Not at all. I see this behaviour. I see it for what it is. It is grim. And you seem to want that.


For example:
<snip for insanity>

That is one of the most spectacular "if I ran the Zoo" tactics I have ever seen, and I have seen many. That gets you right up there with Ken Ham, or Kent Hovind or whatever in terms of outright nutty claims of fact.

That sinks so far into depravity as a proposition that it may well be on par with the Sandy Hook hoax claims.

Now, I try my best to remain within the MA I signed up to, but it becomes challenging to do that when one encounters others with such vile positions that I have to contemplate not the value of human life as a whole, but which ones?

Shall we value a life that cares not if anyone else dies? And indeed enjoys watching those others suffer and die? Simply because they are "other"?

On balance, yes. Let everyone see what they are in plain view, distasteful as it is. Folks need to understand what dingbattery they are dealing with.
 
.

Also on Friday, Pope John Paul II issued a forceful call to his clergy to speak out against pedophilia.

``The church must repeatedly recall the need to protect all people, especially the young, being weak and defenseless,″ the pope told bishops from Belgium, a country rocked by a series of pedophile scandals.


International pedophilia ring uncovered in Italy

https://apnews.com/b5d22a4aec3b0cca713214ec40c099d5
 
Probably in some cases, but outrage is what you'll see in comments.

Realize CTs were tracking crooks and liars long before this became a thing. Uncovering pedophiles in power is part of that process, and apparently an inevitable outcome, the closer the process gets to the top. Ask a detective how that works, whether it is pedophiles or drug running.

Didnt you ask this before? Someone did.

My answer was that when looking at corruption in high places, seeing pedophiles is a subset. It comes with the territory.

For example:

Watching Clintons for all kinds of allegations, you'll notice how many women accuse him of rape, groping, some while in White House. Then you'll see him in Epstein's Lolita Express flight log 2 dozen times, and pictured with some of Jeffrey and Ghislaine's young friends.

All public record now. Why hasnt he at least been picked up for questioning? The locals around St. James Island know. They call it Orgy Island.

While following that you'll note linkage to associated creepy crawlies in power. Who was it that memorably said: "Its a big club and you aint in it.?"

An agency in national security or FBI would dutifully follow them and their connections, epecially after Epstein's invetigation and conviction, considering elements like foreign players, blackmail possibilities, etc. Cell phone location tracking must be rich for bundling them all up, not to mention the eavesdropping. Imagine what law enforcement knows about them.


(George Carlin said it)

Umm. Four? Bill_Clinton_sexual_misconduct_allegationsWP
 
That is flat out hyperbole.

Nevertheless, one must pause to wonder why it is that pedophilia is so attractive to them (the various CT wingnuts of this world).

There are multiple reasons. Perhaps the simplest is that also associating the alleged conspirators with supposed sexual depravity is another way to vilify them. Of course this does not explain why they are so focused on accusations of pedophilia. One could just as easily imagine that they rape adults. In fact that would be more credible.

I think it has a large degree to do with the impact of false allegations of "satanic child abuse" that appeared in the 80s and afterwards. As homosexuality, casual sex and other forms of "debauchery" became more widely tolerated or even acceptable, those who seek to rile people up with tales of sexual depravity and immorality have been forced to explicitly bring up ever more extreme acts to have the same emotional impact as in older times.
 
.

Also on Friday, Pope John Paul II issued a forceful call to his clergy to speak out against pedophilia.

``The church must repeatedly recall the need to protect all people, especially the young, being weak and defenseless,″ the pope told bishops from Belgium, a country rocked by a series of pedophile scandals.


International pedophilia ring uncovered in Italy

https://apnews.com/b5d22a4aec3b0cca713214ec40c099d5

ORLY? then why does the RCC make it their business to protect such pedos as a matter of policy?

I know exactly why. Do you?

Of course not,
 
Whom then, in Maxwell/epstein's elite circles and beyond, typically, might worry about her tattling on them? Think Steve Bing might've been one, as friend of Epstein, Clinton's etc?

Think Trump is one of them?
 
Last edited:

Back
Top Bottom