I don’t see the book as providing many new revelations so much as additional proof, by a right wing insider of all people, of accusations that have already been circulated.May just be me, but I don't think anything here is that big of a revelation, and probably won't make much difference..
Not that I don't think these things are evidence of deep corruption within the Trump administration... just that they seem to be covering things that have already been seen before. Trump supporters were cool with these abuses before, why think they will change now?
As mentioned before... Trump already tried to get Ukraine to help. Congressional republicans said "That's quite OK".
Now someone mentioned how it might help deflect the "Biden/China" claims by Trump.... But we already have video evidence of Trump praising china. (Not to mention other things, like china granting Ivanka certain traidmarks.)
And republicans had no problem with concentration camps right there in the U.S. (for people trying to cross the border).
Again, we've already seen other administration officials criticize Trump. (Most famously Tillerson's "Moron" comment.)
Now, maybe the fact that it's Trump loyalist Pompeo might cause a little dissent within the ranks of the Trump administration (which may be a good thing). But as it stands? It doesn't seem to be a big deal.
Trump has obstructed justice many times for many people/many reasons. Republicans are perfectly fine with it. (Firing inspector generals, lying to FBI officials, etc.)
Everyone knows Kushner has been given a bunch of tasks that he is unqualified for.... (Middle east peace, Covid-19 response, etc.) Its not really a surprise that other people recognize Kushner was in over his head.
We have seen Trump rapidly change his stance over so many topics. We have seen various power struggles before.
Not surprising, since Trump has attempted to reverse various punishments for years now. (Getting Russia back in the G7, failures to comply with various requirements set forward by congress.)
Trump also apparently did not know that the U.K. was a nuclear power.
(From: BBC
Granted, the fact Trump didn't know Finland was an independent country is new, but its hardly surprising. Trump is a spectacularly ignorant person... you can point to dozens of things (from how 'raking forests prevents fires' to 'injecting bleach cures covid19') that illustrate his ignorance. One more item of ignorance isn't going to make much of a difference.
Trump supporters will claim "since he didn't invade he didn't really want to".
Anti-Trump people can point to other things (his nuclear threats against North Korea, his dismantling of the Iran nuclear deal, his infatuation with military parades) to show that Trump is more than capable of leading the U.S. into another war.
He has also been calling the media "enemies of the people", posted a video of himself "beating up" a CNN logo, had chants of "lock her up" at his rallies.
That Trump has no respect for free speech, and is willing to use the justice system for political purposes is not a surprise.
Will it change the minds of the Trump cultists? Would anything? But having Bolton, previously a darling of the right, testify to these things, especially the profound evil and treachery of Trump, has to have some impact on some of his less fanatic supporters.