Qanon Conspiracy theories

Status
Not open for further replies.
beachnut said:
Fox? there goes credibility
Click to expand...



Fail. Rejected.

Any outlet could have aired the same footage of a conversation between the WHO man and the asian woman asking about WHO denying Taiwan a place at the table. WHO man would not answer, with "Lets go to the next question", and by clicking off the video call link.




Tucker Carlson exposed it. Whywouldn't Mockingbird Media do that?
 
Last edited:
Bubba said:
Fail. Rejected.

Any outlet could have aired the same footage of a conversation between the WHO man and the asian woman asking about WHO denying Taiwan a place at the table. WHO man would not answer, with "Lets go to the next question", and by clicking off the video call link.


Tucker Carlson exposed it. Whywouldn't Mockingbird Media do that?
Click to expand...

tucker carlson exposes his biases, and bigotry, he does not do news (at least he takes the virus seriously, and may have woken up the idiot in chief) - better switch to AP news, fox is not the best to curb paranoia and conspiracy theory tendencies -

https://apnews.com/
 
Last edited:
Bubba said:
Fail. Rejected.

Any outlet could have aired the same footage of a conversation between the WHO man and the asian woman asking about WHO denying Taiwan a place at the table. WHO man would not answer, with "Lets go to the next question", and by clicking off the video call link.




Tucker Carlson exposed it. Whywouldn't Mockingbird Media do that?
Click to expand...

What does WHO stand for? Well, it's the World Health Organisation. They stand for the health of everyone in the world.

They have no role in whatever random political spats may be occurring at any time. They have a role in HEALTH.

Somehow, you are unable to figure that out. Why?
 
Cosmic Yak said:
Still lost, I'm afraid.
The Fox News (:D ) video you linked to talks about how the WHO won't mention Taiwan as an independent country. (Shame on them, btw).
Therefore, they are anti-Trump (even though the US is still a signatory to the One China policy, and therefore Trump does not recognise Taiwan as an independent country), and thus the estimated death rate is wrong.
I may not be the only one failing to see the logic in this conclusion. Perhaps you could clarify it?
Click to expand...

Bubba said:
The highlighted "Therefore" summary portion below reeks of a hastily fabricated failed lame face saving device clumsily tacked on to an admission of ignorance by the Slippery Revisionist, thereby betraying a pathetic amateur attempt to paint a nonexistent 'conclusion' into post 2235

Yet another slimy failed Yakkattack.
Click to expand...

In other words, you are unable to explain your own conclusions, and are resorting to bluff and bluster instead.
Glad we cleared that up. :rolleyes:
 
Cosmic Yak said:
In other words, you are unable to explain your own conclusions, and are resorting to bluff and bluster instead.
Glad we cleared that up. :rolleyes:
Click to expand...



Wrong again.

No conclusion was needed since the item was self explanatory .

Hence the issue is that hastily fabricated failed lame face saving 'conclusion' device clumsily tacked on to an admission of ignorance thereby betraying a pathetic amateur attempt to paint an unnecessary 'conclusion' into post 2235.
 
Last edited:
The infantile Q fantasy is based on the idea that Donald Trump is some sort of great crusader going to sweep away the bad guys as he leads America to justice.

This is what the Q believers' hero said at today's coronavirus press conference: "I'm number one on Facebook. Did you know I was number one on Facebook? I just found out I'm number one on Facebook. I thought that was very nice."

Over one thousand Americans will die today from coronavirus.
 
sts60 said:
The infantile Q fantasy is based on the idea that Donald Trump is some sort of great crusader going to sweep away the bad guys as he leads America to justice.

This is what the Q believers' hero said at today's coronavirus press conference: "I'm number one on Facebook. Did you know I was number one on Facebook? I just found out I'm number one on Facebook. I thought that was very nice."

Over one thousand Americans will die today from coronavirus.
Click to expand...
That many fewer negative posts on facebook. Go number one!
 
Bubba said:
So lost. This could provide some direction


Some Inconvenient truth about the WHO.
Click to expand...

This is post 2235.



Cosmic Yak said:
Still lost, I'm afraid.
The Fox News (:D ) video you linked to talks about how the WHO won't mention Taiwan as an independent country. (Shame on them, btw).
Therefore, they are anti-Trump (even though the US is still a signatory to the One China policy, and therefore Trump does not recognise Taiwan as an independent country), and thus the estimated death rate is wrong.
I may not be the only one failing to see the logic in this conclusion. Perhaps you could clarify it?
Click to expand...

This is my first use of the word 'conclusion'.
If this chain of logic is not your conclusion, nor is it an idea you support, and in fact you reject the very idea that any conclusion could be formed from your post, or by anyone reading the linked article, it does rather make me wonder why you posted it in the first place.
Care to clarify?

Cosmic Yak said:
In other words, you are unable to explain your own conclusions, and are resorting to bluff and bluster instead.
Glad we cleared that up. :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

Bubba said:
Wrong again.

No conclusion was needed since the item was self explanatory .
Click to expand...

An explanation that leads to no conclusion is not an explanation.
You also seem strangely unwilling to explain how your article adds any credence to your claim that the WHO is somehow anti-Trump.

Bubba said:
Hence the issue is that hastily fabricated failed lame face saving 'conclusion' device clumsily tacked on to an admission of ignorance thereby betraying a pathetic amateur attempt to paint an unnecessary 'conclusion' into post 2235.
Click to expand...

OK. Have it your way. I was a fool ever to have tried to read some kind of conclusion in your posts. Clearly, no-one can conclude anything from them.
 
sts60 said:
The infantile Q fantasy is based on the idea that Donald Trump is some sort of great crusader going to sweep away the bad guys as he leads America to justice.

This is what the Q believers' hero said at today's coronavirus press conference: "I'm number one on Facebook. Did you know I was number one on Facebook? I just found out I'm number one on Facebook. I thought that was very nice."

Over one thousand Americans will die today from coronavirus.
Click to expand...

We have a president who treats his office like it's a role in a "reality" show; CTists treat all of reality the same way; it's no wonder the two are so simpatico.

There was a time when all communication was by word of mouth; then someone invented writing, which made it more permanent as well as easier to transmit information. Then came printing, so the information was even more accessible. But, with all these steps, there was still time for humans to think about what they were saying or reading, and to assess how useful and accurate the information was; and they had to seek it out, to work for it. Then came radio; then TV- leaps in speed that were geometric advances, and required nothing more than passive gathering, you let the information just wash over you. And now we have the Internet- all the information anyone could ever want, instantaneously, with the advantage that you can pick and choose what you want to hear, in a day and age when confirmation biases won't necessarily threaten survival. And so we have a time, today, when it's no real disadvantage to be unable to distinguish between what you need to know and what merely entertains. I wonder sometime if we, as a species, have come to a point where our ability to disseminate information has outstripped our capacity to usefully assimilate it.
 
Cosmic Yak said:
This is post 2235.

Blah stumble blah





An explanation that leads to no conclusion is not an explanation.
You also seem strangely unwilling to explain how your article adds any credence to your claim that the WHO is somehow anti-Trump.


Bore bore
Click to expand...


I doubt such a claim was made, unless Tucker Carlson made it in that video I posted. I would not support that.

What voodoo spin did you put on it?
 
hurdygurdy said:
Has this tweet already been discussed?

https://twitter.com/lsanger/status/1244733672240054275

It's a thread by Larry Sanger, co-founder of Wikipedia, about the alleged sex-traficking by elites.
Click to expand...

Larry Sanger said:
10/ Now, think. This doesn't take evidence, it takes a little bit of brave thinking.
What must our beloved and distinguished world of famous, rich, and powerful people be like, if Epstein's friends (THOSE people!) are violating teen sex slaves—and the courts *protect* them?
Click to expand...

Stopped reading here. (Should've stopped way earlier)
 
Bubba said:
I doubt such a claim was made, unless Tucker Carlson made it in that video I posted. I would not support that.
Click to expand...

Finally, progress. Of a sort.
I asked you if you thought the WHO was anti-Trump.
If you are now saying it isn't, then can you explain why you doubt the WHO figures on coronavirus death rates?
Perhaps if you were at all capable of saying what you actually think, it wouldn't take 2 pages of this thread just to get this far. Just a thought.
 
gmanontario said:
I have to say, I've been following Qanon for a fairly long time and the more I read about this, it looks like the grandest and most successful social experiment ever.

I sure hope one day there's a reveal.
Click to expand...
Even then people will continue to believe, they'll have too much ego invested and addmitting they were so easily fooled with anathema to their poor self-images. It's like crop circles, when those behind them came forward the nuts denied reality.
Pathetic really, but that's conspiracy believers.
 
Yakkity

Addiction pattern

Putting words in others mouths



Cosmic Yak said:
Finally, progress. Of a sort.
I asked you if you thought the WHO was anti-Trump.
If you are now saying it isn't, then can you explain why you doubt the WHO figures on coronavirus death rates?
Click to expand...

Dont be surprised if this whizzes over yu rhead


Have you ever read about the WWE and how they structure stories?

Trump does.

The human mind can only handle a depth of 4 lies. After that, we lose the plot.

Back when public education was still being planned, Oxford studied the same thing. Rich people we're worried about the poor learning too much and overthrowing the elites.

Oxford eased those fears by explaining, "if you fill people's heads with a bunch of disconnected facts, It causes them to lose rhe plot".

Hitler didn't want to preserve those elites positions, so he did the opposite.

Trump read Hitler and learned WWE.
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom