Qanon Conspiracy theories

Status
Not open for further replies.
Bubba said:
Especially if its true about a correction regarding the 3% or 4% (WHO) death rate being more like less than 1%.

One source says more like .1%.

Yes, Time will tell.
Click to expand...
Indeed, time will tell, and I'm betting the memory of those who were wrong will be surprisingly short.

And don't forget that even if the death rate is in fact only .1 percent, that still means that over 300 thousand Americans will die. How many ventilators and test kits and whatnot are too many? How fast can we cough them up if the calculation is wrong? If it turns out to be more like one percent, that's over 3 million. What are the consequences of having more than we need, relative to fewer? And who will bear the burden of a mistake? The rich or the poor?

Yes indeed, time will tell. I just hope that those who find it easy to trivialize millions of deaths have the grace to shut up when it's over.

e.t.a. If I'm wrong and things go much better than we expect, I'll be happy to say "whew, I'm glad I was so wrong."
 
Last edited:
Resume said:
Q-nuts habitually make pedo accusations without a whiff of evidence. That's just evil and disgusting, period, pard.
Click to expand...

For example, ex-gossip columnist and Q idiot Liz Crokin and others accusing Tom Hanks:

  • QAnon conspiracy theorist Liz Crokin took to her YouTube on New Year’s Eve to recycle an old conspiracy accusing Tom Hanks of being a Pizzagate pedophile
  • Crokin is repeating the same claims as Sarah Ruth Ashcraft and Isaac Kappy, neither ever provided evidence to prove their claims
  • In the video, Crokin touches on deep QAnon conspiracies such as “The Black Eye Club” and the belief red shoes are made from baby skin

Or:
In a tweet from last year, [Sarah Ruth] Ashcraft accused her father of selling her when she was 13 to Tom Hanks for “sex as a dissociated #mindcontrol doll.” She goes on to write, “I wonder how much $$$ my father made for breaking my mind & selling my child body throughout my life. Will I ever get to know?”
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
bruto said:
I just hope that those who find it easy to trivialize millions of deaths have the grace to shut up when it's over.

e.t.a. If I'm wrong and things go much better than we expect, I'll be happy to say "whew, I'm glad I was so wrong."
Click to expand...

Because of measures enacted at the state and local level, we won’t have millions of deaths in this country. Tens of thousands, probably, in this wave.

And, no, the halfwits who buy into the infantile “Q”/“Deep State” fantasies, which mostly is a subset of the harder core Trump cultists, won’t shut up about it - they’re happy to trivialize tens of thousands of American deaths, many caused by the mendacity and incompetence of the Trump administration. Hell, their flabby hero just took to Twitter to congratulate himself on the TV ratings for the WH Coronavirus briefings, and instead of recoiling in disgust like normal adults, they’re lapping it right up.

But they will be quick to say “See, it wasn’t that bad!” because we’ll only lose fifty or sixty thousand people, rather than a million, because of the measures taken by governors and mayors and the like while the Trump gang kept telling us it was no big deal. It’s contemptible, and it’s all because they value feeling clever on the Internet above being functioning citizens and adults in general.
 
carlitos said:
For example, ex-gossip columnist and Q idiot Liz Crokin and others accusing Tom Hanks:

  • QAnon conspiracy theorist Liz Crokin took to her YouTube on New Year’s Eve to recycle an old conspiracy accusing Tom Hanks of being a Pizzagate pedophile
  • Crokin is repeating the same claims as Sarah Ruth Ashcraft and Isaac Kappy, neither ever provided evidence to prove their claims
  • In the video, Crokin touches on deep QAnon conspiracies such as “The Black Eye Club” and the belief red shoes are made from baby skin

Or:
Click to expand...




Baby skin, shmaby skin.

But what is the deal with the red shoes anyway?

Some people just like wearing red shoes.

There is that party pic of Tony Podesta and friends wearing red shoes.

As well as...

Bill Maher


and this image,
Captioned: "...which shows the Biltmore Estate pool, owned by the family of CNN's former CIA man Anderson Cooper. It is juxtaposed with a painting of children, possibly being abused. The ropes by the side of the pool presumably are supposed to be used as rope seats by swimmers when the pool is full of water, but obviously could be used to tie up prisoners...."

(wrong, those ropes would not easily be used that way without adding additional rope.)


Interpretations are of course mixed.

So what if some people just like wearing red shoes ?
 
Last edited:
bruto said:
Indeed, time will tell, and I'm betting the memory of those who were wrong will be surprisingly short.

And don't forget that even if the death rate is in fact only .1 percent, that still means that over 300 thousand Americans will die. How many ventilators and test kits and whatnot are too many? How fast can we cough them up if the calculation is wrong? If it turns out to be more like one percent, that's over 3 million. What are the consequences of having more than we need, relative to fewer? And who will bear the burden of a mistake? The rich or the poor?

Yes indeed, time will tell. I just hope that those who find it easy to trivialize millions of deaths have the grace to shut up when it's over.

e.t.a. If I'm wrong and things go much better than we expect, I'll be happy to say "whew, I'm glad I was so wrong."
Click to expand...

I don't understand the argument for remaining underprepared; if it turns out that we need less ventilators than manufactured as one example, I'm betting the rest of the world might need them. Ditto for protective gear.

This is a novel virus; we don't know what we don't know and we can only model from the empirical data we have so far. We do understand that there are co-morbidity factors that need to be prepared for, including enough hospital beds. We are learning more daily, but that will do no good if we're arguing death rate percentages rather than methods to reduce them.
 
“These new records show how Hillary Clinton was protected from investigation over the Weiner laptop by the FBI for a full month during the presidential campaign,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “And the documents further confirm that Strzok pushed Russia smears of Trump laundered through the media within the FBI. No wonder the FBI is slow rolling the release of these documents.”

Judicial Watch recently uncovered records showing that Clinton apologized to the FBI over her email abuses, but that apology was not in the FBI 302 report documenting her interview. Records also showed that Strzok had information on an intelligence briefing for then-candidate Trump.

In early February 2020, Judicial Watch made public several emails between Strzok and Pagethat showed their direct involvement in the opening of Crossfire Hurricane, the bureau’s investigation of alleged collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia. The records also showed “confirmed classified emails” on Clinton’s unsecure, non-state.gov email server “beyond the number presented” in Comey’s statements.

In January 2020, Judicial Watch revealed Strzok-Page emails that detail special accommodations were given to the lawyers of Clinton and her aides during the investigation of her email controversy. Additionally, in November 2019, Judicial Watch uncovered Strzok-Page emails showing the attorney representing three of Clinton’s aides met with senior FBI officials.

In November 2019, Judicial Watch received DOJ records showing that, after Clinton’s statement denying the transmission of classified information over her unsecure email system, Strzok sent an email to FBI officials citing “three [Clinton email] chains” containing (C) [classified] portion marks in front of paragraphs.”


https://www.judicialwatch.org/press...t&utm_term=members&utm_content=20200330153505
 
Bubba said:
Baby skin, shmaby skin.

But what is the deal with the red shoes anyway?

Some people just like wearing red shoes.

There is that party pic of Tony Podesta and friends wearing red shoes.

As well as...

Bill Maher


and this image,
Captioned: "...which shows the Biltmore Estate pool, owned by the family of CNN's former CIA man Anderson Cooper. It is juxtaposed with a painting of children, possibly being abused. The ropes by the side of the pool presumably are supposed to be used as rope seats by swimmers when the pool is full of water, but obviously could be used to tie up prisoners...."

(wrong, those ropes would not easily be used that way without adding additional rope.)


Interpretations are of course mixed.

So what if some people just like wearing red shoes ?
Click to expand...


The red shoes are actually made from the infant's Kodachrome.
 
Bubba said:
“”... (C) [classified] portion marks in front of paragraphs.”
Click to expand...

(C) portion marking doesn’t stand for “classified”. But then again, you bought into an infantile fantasy that is based on not knowing what a Q clearance is, so par for the course.
 
Last edited:
Bubba said:
Especially if its true about a correction regarding the 3% or 4% (WHO) death rate being more like less than 1%.

One source says more like .1%.

Yes, Time will tell.
Click to expand...

Cosmic Yak said:
Do you believe that the WHO is part of the 'leftist, anti-Trump media' you were complaining about?
Click to expand...

Bubba said:
So lost. This could provide some direction


Some Inconvenient truth about the WHO.
Click to expand...

Still lost, I'm afraid.
The Fox News (:D ) video you linked to talks about how the WHO won't mention Taiwan as an independent country. (Shame on them, btw).
Therefore, they are anti-Trump (even though the US is still a signatory to the One China policy, and therefore Trump does not recognise Taiwan as an independent country), and thus the estimated death rate is wrong.
I may not be the only one failing to see the logic in this conclusion. Perhaps you could clarify it?
 
Bubba said:
Especially if its true about a correction regarding the 3% or 4% (WHO) death rate being more like less than 1%.

One source says more like .1%.

Yes, Time will tell.
Click to expand...

What is the "one source", or is this like trump, making it up from the {}?

source
 
The highlighted "Therefore" summary portion below reeks of a hastily fabricated failed lame face saving device clumsily tacked on to an admission of ignorance by the Slippery Revisionist, thereby betraying a pathetic amateur attempt to paint a nonexistent 'conclusion' into post 2235

Yet another slimy failed Yakkattack.

Originally Posted by Cosmic Yak View Post
Do you believe that the WHO is part of the 'leftist, anti-Trump media' you were complaining about?


Originally Posted by Bubba View Post
So lost. This could provide some direction


Some Inconvenient truth about the WHO.
Click to expand...


Cosmic Yak said:
Still lost, I'm afraid.
The Fox News (:D ) video you linked to talks about how the WHO won't mention Taiwan as an independent country. (Shame on them, btw).


Therefore, they are anti-Trump (even though the US is still a signatory to the One China policy, and therefore Trump does not recognise Taiwan as an independent country), and thus the estimated death rate is wrong. I may not be the only one failing to see the logic in this conclusion. Perhaps you could clarify it?
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom