At least half of the post was aimed at the Daily Fail and other outlets.
Note the bolding of
fact-checked.
The Telegraphs article
Social distancing: new study suggests two metres is not enough The two-metre social distancing rule being used to keep people apart may need to be four times bigger to prevent coronavirus from spreading, a new study by Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) suggests
is arguable less sensational, but no more accurate than the Fail’s article, and no more closely
fact-checked.
Daily Fail
The 26 FOOT sneeze zone: Coronavirus social distancing limit is at least four times TOO SHORT because infectious droplets can fly much further than current 6ft restriction, study warns
The public are currently being asked to keep a distance from each other of at least 6ft 6in.
But a new study by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) suggests the gap should be four times bigger at around 26 feet.