theprestige
Penultimate Amazing
Lame.
Not all totalitarians are fascist totalitarians. I don't judge.
Lame.
Not all totalitarians are fascist totalitarians. I don't judge.
I don't really understand the point of your question.
Somewhere along the line between being an idealist young person in a dead-end third party and a successful politician, Bernie's view became more nuanced and pragmatic.
In the world of political hypocrites and flip-floppers, this slight shift seems pretty insignificant.
Which question?
That's fine. Can he explain why it's okay for private individuals to own the major means of production now? If not, he's gonna scare off centrists with 401k savings.
Collectivization of the means of production was by no means a slight shift, when implemented in practice.
You were doing so well with the first part, and then you had to get personal for some reason.
I'm not being pedantic. It's the way I understood your post initially, and then sought to correct it.
It's pretty obvious what I meant, honestly.
And this isn't the first time you've misinterpreted my words when the intended meaning is quite clear.
Oh, please.Re: Sanders once suggesting the U.S. "nationalize" certain industries...
The problem is, the point of view that he used to have is so far outside the political mainstream (and far beyond what the electorate will accept) that it could be damaging, even if he denounces his past policies.
And Sanders is doing himself no favors with his current policies and rhetoric... Medicare for All (i.e. government control of health care), and "Castro ain't so bad... people learned to read good" statements can be used as ammunition if people want to suggest his "nationalize everything" plans are still a goal of his.
Oh, please.
It's not Sanders today dredging up every quote Sanders ever made.
It's absurd how easily some are lead into that mistake.
But we still won't talk about what a predictable result Castro was given the U.S. backed plantations with a few casinos Batista's wonderous and benevolent rule was.
Asking candidates about stuff they've said seems reasonable.Oh, please.
It's not Sanders today dredging up every quote Sanders ever made.
The mistake of asking candidates what they meant and if they still mean it?It's absurd how easily some are lead into that mistake.
If any of the current candidates are on record with Batista apologetics, I certainly hope people will dredge up every quote they ever made on the subject, and take them to task for it.But we still won't talk about what a predictable result Castro was given the U.S. backed plantations with a few casinos Batista's wonderous and benevolent rule was.
To me, the dumbest thing is how Sanders gets ripped because he says that while the authoritarianism of Cuba is bad, there have been some things that worked.
Meanwhile, Trump brags about how great the authoritarian leaders are, and how he wishes he could be like that.
Asking candidates about stuff they've said seems reasonable.
Everybody thinks their own words are obvious and clear. You'll forgive me if I don't take your own evaluations as authoritative.
Have you considered the possibly that you might not communicate your thoughts clearly? Why assume that I'm the guilty party, here?
Okay so we're maybe halfway into the Super Tues results and I'm thinking tossup.
Anyone else?
Biden winning all the states that won't go Democratic in the general (except Virginia.) Bernie winning Texas is huge. Liz is gonna have some thinkin to do.
Between Bernie and Biden?
Okay so we're maybe halfway into the Super Tues results and I'm thinking tossup.
Anyone else?