Merged 2019-nCoV / Corona virus

Status
Not open for further replies.
The bill was for the ED visit, not because they thought he had coronavirus. Public health is still the only lab doing (allowed to do) coronavirus testing.

Of course he had deceptive-advertising-doesn't-cover-much insurance that had been against the law under the ACA until the GOP gutted it.
It could be true but...
The story sounds fishy to me. What medical device company large enough to send employees to China wouldn’t have good insurance benefits?
 
It is pretty big. The school year is until the end of March, though, but a lot of the graduation ceremonies and entrance exams and other events will also close.

I was wondering if anyone had some expert reactions to this news in Japan.

Some people welcome the news here, and others are saying it is a massive over-reaction, but these are lay people who might only be correct by accident.

I am not responding to you looking for expert reactions but sometimes what seems to be an overreaction is prudent considering the risks.
 
https://virologydownunder.com/past-time-to-tell-the-public-it-will-probably-go-pandemic-and-we-should-all-prepare-now/

These experts warn of something I was suspecting all along. Too much focus on "containment" is actually harmful, because governments are avoiding pushing towards slowing the spread of the virus, with measures such as the closing of schools etc.

This graph shows quite effectively why we need to focus on slowing efforts, so that health systems don´t collapse:

I'm not quite getting it, do containment attempts work counter to slowing it somehow?
 
I'm not quite getting it, do containment attempts work counter to slowing it somehow?

No question.

If people aren't going to work or school, the possibility of infecting others is vastly reduced. This is what happened in China.

Whether other countries manage to contain and mitigate it as well as China has, is doubtful.
 
I suspect in the end the rate will go down because there must have been many unreported cases in Wuhan. I hope so.

What you need to keep in mind is that a 1-2% death rate is a reduction from the outset of the disease.

The death rate in China is running at 3.5%.
 
No question.

If people aren't going to work or school, the possibility of infecting others is vastly reduced. This is what happened in China.

Whether other countries manage to contain and mitigate it as well as China has, is doubtful.

But wasnt that post saying the opposite, that containment was helping to spread the disease?
 
But wasnt that post saying the opposite, that containment was helping to spread the disease?

It's poor wording. The article was using "containment" to mean focusing on contact tracing, locking down borders and trying to keep it out and not educating people on how to slow/halt the spread. Social distancing and hygiene are what limits the spread and people should be preparing for that. They are not mutually exclusive. China has shown this can reduce R0 below 1.
 
Last edited:
Thats why I was seeing a false dichotomy

You were not alone.

It's poor wording. The article was using "containment" to mean focusing on contact tracing, locking down borders and trying to keep it out and not educating people on how to slow/halt the spread. Social distancing and hygiene are what limits the spread and people should be preparing for that. They are not mutually exclusive. China has shown this can reduce R0 below 1.

Thanks for the explanation.
 
Well, at least the USA is safe now Mike Pence is in charge of fighting the Devil's spores, so there is that.
 
https://virologydownunder.com/past-time-to-tell-the-public-it-will-probably-go-pandemic-and-we-should-all-prepare-now/

These experts warn of something I was suspecting all along. Too much focus on "containment" is actually harmful, because governments are avoiding pushing towards slowing the spread of the virus, with measures such as the closing of schools etc.

This graph shows quite effectively why we need to focus on slowing efforts, so that health systems don´t collapse:

That's interesting. I would have thought the two goals were more similar than that. I do think the goal should be slowing things down until those antivirals and vaccines are developed.

I think China's reaction locking people in who may not have food was not helpful.

Iran is going to lash people who spread 'misinformation' (:rolleyes: ). No wonder their number-of-cases/death don't make sense.
 
Today's sitrep from WHO isn't pretty. 700 new cases outside China, including 9 new countries.

I thought we were doing so well.
 
Today's sitrep from WHO isn't pretty. 700 new cases outside China, including 9 new countries.

I thought we were doing so well.
You did? :boggled:

No way, not until we have antivirals and a vaccine. I do believe those will be here sooner than some of the standard predictions.
 
I wish we could say if you're sick, stay home, but when big businesses want maximum production as long as you aren't on your deathbed it'll be tough to contain such a non-fatal disease.
 
Daily Mail: A pet Pomeranian dog in Hong Kong has tested positive for this virus. It's female owner also tests positive and it is believed that the dog caught it from her.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom