Skeptic Ginger
Nasty Woman
- Joined
- Feb 14, 2005
- Messages
- 96,955
From the article:The groups not given public funds who were rated as more reliable, effective, and deserving of those funds.
Perhaps go back and read the story again.
Catholic Charities has an obsessive pro-choice policy. Does that mean any pregnant prostitutes who want an abortion need to go elsewhere? Yes. And Catholics are still against birth control.A September 12 internal DOJ memo recommended that the grant money go to the Catholic Charities of the Diocese of Palm Beach and Chicanos Por La Causa of Phoenix, according to an exclusive report by Reuters. The recommendations were based on reviews from outside contractors. Instead, the grant money went to two organizations the contractors gave lower ratings: Hookers for Jesus and the Lincoln Tubman Foundation.
The funding decision was made in order to "distribute funding across as many states as possible," according to a September 23 memo obtained by Reuters. Head of the Office of Justice Programs, Katharine Sullivan, approved the decision, telling Reuters, "Our funding decisions are based on a merit-based review system."
Chicanos Por La Causa of Phoenix appears to only have outpatient services.
Hookers for Jesus is a Christian organization founded by former sex worker and sex trafficking victim Annie Lobert in 2007. The organization operates Destiny House, a one-year safehouse program for sex-trafficking victims and women who want to leave sex work, as well as a number of other outreach programs.
Who were the outside contractors who made the recommendation?
I'm the last person who would support Bush's Faith Based grants. But anti-abortion vs anti-gay... and the inpatient treatment program vs only outpatient... It's not as clear cut as you make it out to be.
Last edited: