trustbutverify
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- May 5, 2007
- Messages
- 10,541
Today
https://www.nzherald.co.nz/world/news/article.cfm?c_id=2&objectid=12297033
A wife a dog and a cat, NRA thanked.
Perhaps he thought his home was being invaded.
Today
https://www.nzherald.co.nz/world/news/article.cfm?c_id=2&objectid=12297033
A wife a dog and a cat, NRA thanked.
You want the press to ignore these attacks? Even the white supremacist ones?
It certainly would be worth trying. But there are other less radical approaches, like less focus on the shooter, weapons, and political standing, and more focus on the victims.
To keep track on the issue as whole, monthly statistics and analysis should be enough.
I don't see why focus on the victim means ignoring the attacker's motive. If the motivation was irrational hatred of a class, I suspect that class has lots to say about it.Interesting. I'd be curious of the reaction from the poc activist community, once they become aware the press is stratigically ignoring the political motivations of those mass killing their members. I'm sure they'll understand.
I don't see why focus on the victim means ignoring the attacker's motive. If the motivation was irrational hatred of a class, I suspect that class has lots to say about it.
What proposal made would result in a situation where "the press is strategically ignoring the political motivations of those mass killing their members?"It doesn't, and I'm 100% in favor of focusing on the victims. However, that wasn't the proposal I was commenting on.
What proposal made would result in a situation where "the press is strategically ignoring the political motivations of those mass killing their members?"
The one where mass shootings are ignored by the press to avoid encouraging copy cats, among other things I suppose, and are later (possibly) integrated into statistical reports open to the public.
In other words, not "strategically ignoring" poc targeted shootings specifically.The one where mass shootings are ignored by the press to avoid encouraging copy cats, among other things I suppose, and are later (possibly) integrated into statistical reports open to the public.
Of course not. That would be insane. I used that community as an example because, given the history involved and their current plight, I'm not sure they'd appreciate sacrificing what they might consider vital information for the greater good. I wouldn't be surprised to see some fairly potent cover-up conspiracy theories gain traction.In other words, not "strategically ignoring" poc targeted shootings specifically.
I hear there is some agreement somewhere that news agencies won't report on suicides of celebrities, as those always trigger wave of copy cats. But can't find it, I think it was not US, maybe UK ? Any idea ?
Thing is, most of the time, the shooting is type of suicide attempt.
Washington State is CCW, right? Could this not be a multiple good guy with a gun thing?