rjh01
Gentleman of leisure
Code:
<snip>
How do you get around the great fir walll? (Spelling errors deliberate so not to mention sensitive topics)
Great couple posts.
<snip>
Code:
How do you get around the great fir walll? (Spelling errors deliberate so not to mention sensitive topics)
Great couple posts.
Which one are you talking about? We have two of them here who fit that description....
We are seeing a totalitarian regime expand across the world, particularly the Pacific, and the world is powerless to contain it. Think of it like climate change.
New Zealand is powerless for example. There is implicit blackmail in every deal, criticism of China is near impossible. They are paying a pittance to tinpot dictators in the Pacific for long term "leases". New Zealanders' lifestyles are dependent on trade with China, so unwilling or powerless become interchangeable terms. This situation in Hong Kong makes me weep, people can hold Trump accountable and are doing so. But the supreme power and structure in China looks permanent and immutable, inevitably leading to complete world domination. Stewie will be watching keenly.Powerless or unwilling?
New Zealand is powerless for example. There is implicit blackmail in every deal, criticism of China is near impossible. They are paying a pittance to tinpot dictators in the Pacific for long term "leases". New Zealanders' lifestyles are dependent on trade with China, so unwilling or powerless become interchangeable terms. This situation in Hong Kong makes me weep, people can hold Trump accountable and are doing so. But the supreme power and structure in China looks permanent and immutable, inevitably leading to complete world domination. Stewie will be watching keenly.
But the supreme power and structure in China looks permanent and immutable, inevitably leading to complete world domination. Stewie will be watching keenly.
Nothing endures forever. China's dictatorship is strong, but it is also brittle. It is in constant risk of collapse, and though it may yet last lifetimes, it is not eternal, and its dominance is not inevitable. Oft evil will shall evil mar. China is creating enemies even as it spreads its influence.
Carrie Lam says she will respect vote in which pro-democracy politicians are set to win control of 17 out of 18 councils
Hong Kong’s voters have turned out in record numbers to deliver a landslide for pro-democracy campaigners in local elections, handing them control of almost every one of the region’s 18 councils for the first time.
The results are a powerful rebuke to the government in a vote that was widely seen as a proxy referendum on the city’s protest movement.
Hong Kong’s chief executive, Carrie Lam, said her government would respect the election results and would “listen humbly” to the views of the public.
While Lam appeared to strike a conciliatory tone, Beijing warned that the territory would always remain part of China.
“Whatever happens, Hong Kong is always a part of China and any attempts to create chaos in Hong Kong or to jeopardise its prosperity and stability will not be successful,” said the Chinese foreign minister, Wang Yi, during a visit to Japan.
Both in absolute numbers and in turnout rates it was easily the biggest exercise in democratic participation that Hong Kong has seen, with many voters waiting more than an hour to cast their ballots.
When polls closed at 10.30pm on Sunday, nearly 3 million people had voted, representing more than 71% of the electorate and nearly half of Hong Kong’s population. Many had never voted before.
Pro-democracy politicians’ unexpected clean sweepwas a unanimous vote of no confidence in the government, analysts say.
Unfortunately, Carrie Lam is serving two masters. It is just a matter of time before the more powerful one dominates.
No doubt somehow China has the personal details of the voters. If not you can bet this will happen. Did they wear facemasks into the polling booths and inside?It seems the 'silent majority' in Hong Kong actually supported the protesters.
I wonder whether China will accept this result.
Here is a serious question. Did Trump effectively prevent a militiary invasion of Hong Kong by the mainland?
Here is a serious question. Did Trump effectively prevent a militiary invasion of Hong Kong by the mainland?