1) The Bible does not have "clauses"
2) The Bible does not mention nuclear war with the angels
3) Angels are not a "species".
4) Radiation does not turn adults into monsters ( except in B-Grade 1950's science fiction movies)
1) I was not referring to the Bible, but to what I wrote back in 2013; which was not related to this thread, and should not have been posted here without my permission; which thread in order to have been deleted as per my granted by the administrator request back then, according to the administrator, all posts under it would also had to have been deleted as well. You therefore searched for it, or asked for it and obtained it, again without my permission; and copied and pasted and posted, by clipping and re-attaching what would serve your purpose, again without my permission; given that as the sole author of the thread, I have the first, the only, and the final say on what, from my writing, is posted anywhere else, other than where I had chosen to post it. In your desperation to make a point you acted repeatedly, and unequivocally, as a trinket peddler, and a tin-horn lawyer. What is more, despite my continuous willingness to disregard such quite important for most people matters, you continue with your crooked ways.
You want a break! Quit the nonsense!
2) I didn't say it did. I was referring to a nuclear war on a given planet. We almost had one on Earth. We also had nuclear fall outs (Nevada, Hiroshima, Nagasaki, Chernobyl, Fukushima).
3) If Angels did exist, they would in some form or another.
4) I wasn't speaking about "adults"; I used the word "teratogeny" ( Teratgenesis - Greek word "Tera"-Monstrous / , "geny" - birth) look it up!
https://www.aafp.org/afp/2010/0901/p488.html
Your posts have become more incoherent and random in thought, than usual. You should have a break and relocate to a religious forum. You will have more luck at these forums. Currently, you have chosen to post on a forum that laughs at bad science and religion. It is like Adolf Hitler posting on a Jewish forum and wondering why everyone is attacking his ideas about exterminating Jews.
Your analogy would have been successful, if I had ever even imagined putting Atheists in concentration camps; or if it ever even remotely crossed my mind to exterminate anything other than certain bugs (or germs). Infinitism though, is all about personal and social positivity. It is hard sometimes to keep a positive attitude amidst the barrage of constant negativity, true be told, without stress and harm to your health which is another form of negativity, "but who can attain to their ideal." Especially when dealing with deviousness, dishonesty and trickery.
Well in striving for positivity, to at least retain a balance amidst the negativity, sometimes all one can do is stay as positive as the circumstances allow for, without being hurt or making the situation worse for himself or anyone else for that matter. After all, "if you keep on getting slapped on the face, and turning over a cheek, you'll quickly run out of cheeks that can tolerate further slapping; further negativity is generated. Now you hurt those who care for you, because among other things, you have also run out of cheeks that can tolerate any endearing behavior on them by your significant other. I don't slap you, you don't slap me, "Kum ba ya"; you break the deal, you face the music, simple.
It is a bet with quite the odds in favor though; especially if one pays no mind to trivial matters such as "ethics", to just throw things out their at the bottom of a thread.
Most people, after all, don't have the time, the aptitude or the disposition; to scroll up, and click back, to further scroll up and down, and search and compare statements. Especially on a cell phone, where constant zooming of the view is required to not get cross-eyed or have a headache. "Tapatalk" helps, but has only minimal functionality in scrolling, or editing. Now if you forget to copy your writing after being required to re-log a few times; for security purposes I imagine, you will have to start all over, because often times you are not directed automatically back to the posting page. Which explains my sometimes disregard for spelling and grammatical structure.
So
throwing mud works. Some doubt will stick in people's mind, and for some people who have all their arguments nullified, the aces left in their pocket or their sleeves, are deceit, defamation, character assassination, and the insulting of people's intelligence. Nevertheless a bet is a bet, and requires risks taken. When you attempt to throw curve-balls, you may slip and fall and get hurt. You may overestimate your intelligence, and underestimate the cognitive ability of other people too much. Baseball is not for everybody, and neither is betting. Some people better stick to playing marbles while trying to keep them marbles together, and without the betting. When cheating on cards, you may get caught and get the tar and the feathers.
In regards to the links mentioned; I like this site just fine. Last time I checked this is the "Religion and Philosophy" topic. This is my thread, and I'll post it wherever I see fit posting it. This is a skeptics forum, and as far as I can tell, the only certainty is the Infinite; so I am posting on the right forum.
Pyrrho of Elis (b. circa 360 BCE):
"Whoever wants to live well (eudaimonia) must consider these three questions: First, how are pragmata (ethical matters, affairs, topics) by nature? Secondly, what attitude should we adopt towards them? Thirdly, what will be the outcome for those who have this attitude?"
"As for pragmata they are all adiaphora (undifferentiated by a logical differentia), astathmēta (unstable, unbalanced, not measurable), and anepikrita (unjudged, unfixed, undecidable). Therefore, neither our sense-perceptions nor our doxai (views, theories, beliefs) tell us the truth or lie; so we certainly should not rely on them. Rather, we should be adoxastous (without views), aklineis (uninclined toward this side or that), and akradantous (unwavering in our refusal to choose), saying about every single one that it no more is than it is not or it both is and is not or it neither is nor is not."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philosophical_skepticism
