Eric Ciaramella - whistleblower

Didn't take long for the knives to come out and people stop addressing the article and start personalizing it but that's is, as someone recently said here.....SOP

OK - addressing the article: Nobody legitimately cares.

Quite a few illegitimates carry on about it as if it made some kind of difference, but there is no valid reason to care.
Because of the multiple corroborations of the report, that cat is out of the bag, that parrot is truly deceased, that train has left the station, too little, too late, crying over spilled milk, those horses are gone and it is too late to close that barn door, crying won't help you, praying won't do you no good.
 
Trump's demand that the Whistleblower be identified is encouraging the breaking of a law i.e. incitement.

In criminal law, incitement is the encouragement of another person to commit a crime. Depending on the jurisdiction, some or all types of incitement may be illegal. Where illegal, it is known as an inchoate offense, where harm is intended but may or may not have actually occurred.

Lock. Him. Up.
 
Okay, so, second try on the image:

untitled.jpg

Again, the link:
https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/genetic

My point is that this thread exists to intimidate the (alleged) messenger rather than rationally discredit the message.

So far, nothing has been presented to persuade us that the (alleged) whistleblower didn't have his or her facts straight.
 
Last edited:
Wow, imagine if the entire justice system operated the way Trumpublicans are saying that it should with this whisleblower.....
 
I had not heard of that particular logical fallacy, but by name I'd think it would be something like
 

Attachments

  • fallacy.jpg
    fallacy.jpg
    38.1 KB · Views: 14
Wow, imagine if the entire justice system operated the way Trumpublicans are saying that it should with this whisleblower.....

It makes being a defense attorney more interesting.


Officer: We found a body under the bridge. It had a note on it in the defendant's handwriting saying "I killed this guy because I'm above the law and there is nothing you can do about it" Also, the dead man had a smartphone in his hands that contained a video of the incident where the defendant fired a gun at him. Also, we have tweets from the defendant acknowledging his shooting the victim.

Def atty: Officer, who told you about the body?

Officer: Some guy who was in the area putting up Bernie Sanders campaign signs.

Def atty" MOVE TO DISMISS THAT GUY WAS BIASED MY CLIENT IS A REPUBLICAN AND ALL OF THIS IS TAINTED HOW DARE THEY ASRGGHHGHGHGH!!!!!

Trump Appointee Judge: Yeah, good point. Case dismissed.
 
I just know that the Whistleblower's attorney is going to mess up the whole plan.

Today we've got: (from Twitter)

Mark Zaid predicting a coup in 2017
Mark Zaid's YouTube channel that he linked to from his website showing his love of Disney Girl videos.
Mark Zaid's foundation having John Podesta sitting on it's board.
 
I just know that the Whistleblower's attorney is going to mess up the whole plan.

Today we've got: (from Twitter)

Mark Zaid predicting a coup in 2017

We've gone over this. Disliking the President means **** all, and one can do their job while having a political bias.

Mark Zaid's YouTube channel that he linked to from his website showing his love of Disney Girl videos.

I'm still looking for a credible link to this because not even Fox has posted it but have posted on the "coup" statement. Sorry, I don't find Twitter trustworthy and the only website I can actually find that supports this is named "NOQ".

Mark Zaid's foundation having John Podesta sitting on it's board.

Per the man himself:

I love watching right wing spin my so-called relationship to @johnpodesta bc of his listed affiliation as "advisor" to @JMadisonProject, which I founded in 1998. I believe last time I interacted w/Mr. Podesta was possibly in 2000, nearly 20 years ago.

It certainly doesn't seem like Podesta is actually involved in any way, and they don't get together. Podesta had a lot of people fooled. It sucks this guy is one of them.

I don't know this guy, and if he's a douche then he's a douche. That doesn't change the fact that Trump shouldn't be trying to out the whistleblower, **** like this is good for nothing other than a lame attempt at discrediting the whistleblower and his attorney, and the whistleblower is irrelevant because Trump and the transcript confirmed everything both whistleblowers have said.

tl;dr Who gives a ******
 

Back
Top Bottom