I get the "Well they got Capone through his tax records!" is one of those things the Democrats are fixated on, but when the President of the United States is a Russian Sleeper agent without the sleeping and we can't make that stick on him, I'm not holding my breath for the scene where we have the accountant break out his ledger.
There's two elements to this. Well, three. The first is comparable to Capone, where the tax records may show a crime in and of themselves - tax evasion being what Capone was put away for.
The second is that the tax records may uncover evidence of crimes that aren't directly related to tax. For example, receiving large, unaccounted for sums of money, or large sums of money that
can be accounted for as having been received from Russian cut-outs. There's a reason why "follow the money" is an adage.
The third is that the more evidence there is against Trump, the easier it becomes to "make that stick on him". Not just because the evidence itself can be instrumental in a conviction, but because people who would otherwise shield him can turn against him if shielding him starts to come at too much of a cost. And shielding can come at too much of a cost for many who shield him if more of the public turn against him.
And I know that people often like to paint it as "Trump supporters are all unthinking and will never, ever turn against him in any way". But that ignores the people who are more in the middle (who do exist). The people who don't like him as a person, but who have supported him any way because they think that will help them achieve their agenda (whatever that may be).
And it is also just wrong in and of itself. A Fox News poll recently indicated that Trump is losing support over his impeachment inquiry,
and over his abandoning the Kurds (although I must confess that I can't find a direct link).
Pat Robertson
said that Trump is “in danger of losing the mandate of heaven”. I suspect that Evangelicals are likely to be more loyal to Robertson than they are Trump, and Evangelicals are a not-small portion of Trump's base. Robertson withdrawing his support would be significant.
Fox have been more critical of Trump as of late, and both Matt Drudge and Tucker Carlson published on their respective websites articles that were critical of him over these issues, as did Breitbart.
And yes, I know, these are all just small moves, and it hasn't all happened
right now, but that's how these things happen. It's a long game, and just because Trump hasn't been held accountable for his crimes yet doesn't imply that he never will be. Of course, it doesn't imply that he
will, either, but that doesn't make his tax records insignificant. The more that comes out, the less support he will have, and the less support he has, the more vulnerable he is.