Yea like that stopped white water and would have preventing anything had they turned up clear felonies on the part of clinton. If Bill committed felonies in white water he would have been impeached and convicted. Seriously "sure he committed some felonies and should go to prison for years because of it but they were before he was president." 5 years ago anyone saying such crap would be thought of as truly insane.
Are we sure we want to turn into Italy where becoming President turns out to be a good way to prevent you from going to prison?
It's a real crime, but how serious is another matter. That's why judges have leeway in sentencing.
Like I said before, I would love for this to be an issue or right or wrong, but there is a political calculus involved.
FEC violations are not the biggest crimes he can charged with.
Lesson No. 1: Be narrow and specific, perhaps with a near-exclusive focus on Ukraine
Lesson No. 2: Don’t overpromise on details unless you can deliver.
Lesson No. 3: Emphasize the threats to election integrity.
Lesson No. 4: Stay unified.
Lesson No. 5: Work quickly and urgently.
Nate Silver at 538 has some impeachment advice:
https://fivethirtyeight.com/feature...ssia-was-unpopular-will-ukraine-be-different/
That's not interesting at all. The Republicans are underreacting, the Democrats are overreacting. That is pretty boring, politics as usual type stuff. The specifics of which charge(s) the Democrats are going to commit to as the The One Thing For Real This Time, are kind of interesting.
Ranting about how the Republicans are unwilling to impeach might have been interesting a couple years ago, when it had some chance of being a novel insight.
And "Repugnicans" must have been interesting for all of about 30 seconds after it was first coined.
How about "Stormy" ?
Just to recap: theprestige thinks this is boring and uninteresting.
And he's been kind enough to post three times in this thread already to let us all know how bored and uninterested he is.
Not sure she'd want to telegraph her game plan to Trump's lawyers any earlier than strictly necessary.So what are we gonna hear at 5 from Pelosi? Just a vague "We're going forward" or actual like detailed "Here's what we are starting impeachment proceedings on, bullet form, accusations X, Y, and Z, the whole show starts a 8:00 on this day" kind of thing?
Hopefully Trump will add Giuliani to his crack legal defense team.Not sure she'd want to telegraph her game plan to Trump's lawyers any earlier than strictly necessary.
What's "this", in your analysis?Just to recap: theprestige thinks this is boring and uninteresting.
And he's been kind enough to post three times in this thread already to let us all know how bored and uninterested he is.
What's "this", in your analysis?
I am however extremely disappointed in America in that we haven't yet bestowed a code name based upon a porn movie title to the whistleblower.
More of a "these", then, but whatever.The multiple things in your quoted post that you deemed boring or uninteresting.
In the same way that making a sequel instead of coming up with something original seems like an obvious choice to Hollywood.Deep Throat 2 seems the obvious choice.....