When did 'communicator' become the main function of the Fed chair? I thought the purpose of the fed's chair was to help set rates.Trump Tweets
Jay Powell and the Federal Reserve Fail Again. No “guts,” no sense, no vision! A terrible communicator!
I don't have an opinion on that.
There is evidence that it is not from that date. Video is from a Sept. 12 event. The tweet that was the source for the dancing video is very clear about where and when the event was taking place, so whoever put together the smear had to have known it was false. This is propaganda meant to rile up the Islamophobic base of the right.
Trump's desperation will be nasty. He will absolutely paint targets on people and hope that some idiot from his base takes action.
Trump Tweets
Jay Powell and the Federal Reserve Fail Again. No “guts,” no sense, no vision! A terrible communicator!
I like to see the tiny cracks in the Graham/Trump relationship, though I'm no Iran hawk and I'd just as soon see "measured" responses against it.Trump Tweets
No Lindsey, it was a sign of strength that some people just don’t understand!
Lindsey Graham
@LindseyGrahamSC
The measured response by President @realDonaldTrump regarding the shooting down of an American drone was clearly seen by the Iranian regime as a sign of weakness.
I like to see the tiny cracks in the Graham/Trump relationship, though I'm no Iran hawk and I'd just as soon see "measured" responses against it.
Perceived missteps by Trump on U.S. national security is one thing that bothers the usually sycophantic GOP senators.
I like to see the tiny cracks in the Graham/Trump relationship, though I'm no Iran hawk and I'd just as soon see "measured" responses against it.
Perceived missteps by Trump on U.S. national security is one thing that bothers the usually sycophantic GOP senators.
It's been taken down.
I'm really curious how lower pollution standards will make cars safer. The clouds of particulate will provide a cushion in a crash?
Trump, who has a bizarre desire to increase air pollution in the United States, has for months threatened to withdraw California’s authority under the Clean Air Act to set its own limits for auto emissions...as it has done for more than five decades.
His reason? He doesn’t really have one. It’s mostly out of pique. Link
It's incredible, makes one worry if he doesn't believe it already, that "I'm the chosen one" comment is becoming real to him.I notice the religious content in his tweets and rants is going up....
Not an Iran hawk, but also think that Iran gets cut a bit too much slack around here. IMHO morally, little to choose between Iran and Saudi, except that Iran seems to have a slightly better PR machine, and is smart enough to conduct it's killings on the quiet.
You mean Saudi?Not an Iran hawk, but also think that Iran gets cut a bit too much slack around here. IMHO morally, little to choose between Iran and Saudi, except that Iran seems to have a slightly better PR machine, and is smart enough to conduct it's killings on the quiet.
Neither do I. That is why I asked.
Because the costs related to improved mileage would be a relatively small fraction of the cost of a new car (and would largely be offset by savings at the gas pump). Because people's purchases are often based on the status of their current car rather than the cost of a replacement.
Simply put, its doubtful that many will say "Oh new cars are now 1% cheaper. I'll ditch my old car that only has 10,000 miles on it to buy a new one". Instead, they will stay in their old cars until they die.
Oh, and there is anotehr 'excuse' given by Trump fanboys... that better fuel mileage requires lighter cars, which makes them unsafer. Which ignores the fact that making cars lighter doesn't necessarily make them unsafe (since safety often depends on things like crumple zones, which are independent of weight.)
ETA: It also ignores the issue of public health, such as respiratory diseases, caused by excessive exhaust emissions. Trumps attempts to relax emissions standards will result in more public harm from things like smog than could ever be saved by somehow 'safer' cars.
Aaah, gotcha.
It does seem like the rare smog-related deaths would balance out the also rare deaths prevented by a small increase in safer, newer cars.