But I tend towards the view that the House has an obligation to impeach Trump because the apparent incompetence and corruption of the president should be dealt with. To ignore blatant acts such as the repeated, brazen violation of the emoluments clause is to imply that such violations are acceptable. If Clinton should be impeached because of perjury (and I tend to think he should have been), then Trump should be impeached due to his myriad shenanigans (including, some argue, perjury in his written testimony in the Mueller investigation, though I know little about that).
I'm not so inclined to think that Clinton should have been impeached, given the "ha, gotcha on a technicality" level of what was in play there. The constant criminal and deeply harmful to, for example, national security actions of Trump, on the other hand, pretty well demands it.
As an example from... well, now yesterday here....
Trump's plan to pay for border wall with Air Force funds risks national security, report says
The report, compiled by the U.S. Air Force and obtained by NBC News, details the importance of each of the 51 military projects chosen by the Trump administration to lose their funding.
From that, incidentally,
One of the major areas affected were military construction projects supporting the European Defense Initiative, a program intended to increase U.S. military presence in Europe to deter Russian aggression. In some cases, without the construction projects, the bases identified as part of the initiative cannot support the deployment of U.S. airmen or assets.
By now, a blind man could likely see that there's something fishy about Trump's actions related to Russia.
At least...
Trump finally agrees to release military aid to Ukraine after apparent blackmail effort fails
The New York Times reports that Trump has folded on this part of the scheme after the idea of withholding aid from a U.S. ally created outrage on both sides of the aisle. Trump had been claiming that he was delaying the aid while waiting for a Pentagon review. The truth was that the Pentagon had finished the review even before Trump issued the hold. How obvious was Trump’s blackmail effort? So obvious that one of those who went to tell him to let it go was Lindsey Graham.
Halting the flow of U.S. support has put an incredible strain on the new administration in Ukraine. Volodymyr Zelensky ran for president on a platform of bringing his country closer to Western Europe and eliminating corruption. But it was exactly elements of the previous corrupt, Russia-leaning government who had been the subject of outreach from Trump and Giuliani. After it was clear that he was no longer welcome in Kiev, Giuliani even traveled to Madrid to make it clear to a Ukrainian official that they needed to play ball in giving Trump what he wanted if they expected to have the support package.
I am sort of pro Impeachment hearings, not so pro actually voting to impeach. I just think the chances of convicntion are zero, and an acquittal would almost guarantee Trump reelection.
Chances of conviction are quite low, yes... but the real question then is whether that can be turned into a millstone to hang around the GOP's neck. Trump's crimes and improprieties that are on par with crimes are numerous, frequently well-documented, and varied, to say the least.
Consider Bolton, a man who has done absolutely nothing wrong, not a scandal to his name; and yet he's effectively cast out of influence because he argued with Trump. Tucker Carlson called him "a man of the left" on his Fox News show, on a network on which Bolton himself has served as a conservative commentator.
That kind of behavior is pretty strong evidence of a cult, incidentally.
She scares them because she's so good at her job. I heard her questioning during a House hearing yesterday and she was incredible.
Not just that, for that matter. Democrats have had serious problems with messaging for far too long - she's helping quite a fair bit to upend that, before getting a whole bunch of other things about her. She's certainly not perfect, but she's done quite well in many, many ways... not least in making a fool of so many "conservatives" who have made inane criticisms of her (much as it can be expected that only the inane criticisms are likely to be seen on the GOP and far right propaganda outlets).
As it is, a couple hours ago, I happened to be subjected to a TV interview where there was a Republican defending her attempt to equate AOC with Cambodian genocide in that ad during the Democratic candidate debate using logic that was basically AOC = single payer = socialism = Cambodian genocide. I think you can likely figure out the foghorn, since it's so far beyond dog-whistles at this point.
Anyways, random news time.
Trump fired us 'so they wouldn’t catch him,' his undocumented workers tell Samantha Bee
...It's honestly rather telling if the superiors actually were actively helping the illegals get fake paperwork.
Then there's this -
Let me get this straight. The US Department of Justice is trying to keep evidence gathered in a criminal investigation of the President away from Congress - which, under our Constitution, holds "sole power of impeachment." This is a lawless delay tactic, doomed to fail in court. @eliehonig
Sums it up nicely.
Voting Rights Roundup: North Carolina GOP unveils new stealth gerrymanders to replace illegal ones
Just in case one might hope that the GOP would obey an unfavorable ruling in good faith. Also a bunch of other news at that link about current voting rights news.
Gay couple sues over Trump admin's denial of 2-month-old baby's U.S. citizenship
Maryland residents Roee Kiviti and Adiel Kiviti are naturalized U.S. citizens, and their baby, Kessem, was born in Canada via surrogate. Both parents are on the child’s birth certificate, but “Immigration Equality, Lambda Legal and the law firm Morgan Lewis, which represent the Kivitis, in a press release notes the State Department is treating the couple’s daughter as ‘born out of wedlock’ because only Adiel Kiviti has a biological connection to her,” according to the Washington Blade.
The couple notes that their 3-year-old son, Lev, was also born via surrogate in Canada in 2016, and they had no issues when it came to his documentation. “We got Lev’s passport within two days,” Kiviti told CNN. “We did the exact same process with our daughter Kessem earlier this month, and then received a phone call indicating that this was being treated as an out-of-wedlock birth, and as such, there are additional requirements that need to be met.”
This is not the only gay couple to recently be blindsided by the Trump administration and have their child’s citizenship put in doubt. “An attorney for the Kiviti family says their suit is at least the fourth such case to challenge the policy,” NBC News reported. Roee and Adiel now worry if their family will be forced apart, or uprooted entirely.