Aridas
Crazy Little Green Dragon
Because the idea that moderates are less important then extreme Democrats is frankly absurd and I don't why that's the narrative the Democrats keep trying to sell that as the narrative.
Objection - even Bernie Sanders is nowhere remotely close to the extreme left. Don't fall for that hostile framing. Don't indulge it, either. There's lots of actually extreme right-wingers in the GOP and the GOP is pandering to them. There's no (or practically no) extreme left-wingers in the Democratic Party and the Democratic Party isn't pandering to the actual far left. Don't allow the false equivalence to twist your perception.
I'm going to insert another post, though, because it's close enough to this to address them both with one thing.
The calculus is thus:
The Left is already highly motivated to turn out this election, our disdain for the current occupant of the White House demands it.
In and of itself, our motivation to vote may not be enough to overcome institutional roadblocks and secure the office of POTUS.
There are many on The Right who are un-enthusiastic about Trump, and may be inclined to vote against him (or not vote for the POTUS at all) if the candidate we run does not trigger the knee-jerk "OMG SOCIALISTS!!!!" as readily as some of our more left leaning options.
In order to win, it is likely that we will need a candidate who will do well amongst the (small) number of Independents- while not stirring the lukewarm to cold Right leaning voters into action.
At this time, Biden seems to be the best prospect for that. I don't think many of us actually expect him to govern (or even survive his first term), but he may be the one most able to give us a "rubber stamp" presidency.
This seems relevant.
As a corollary to that, would you say concerns that "We shouldn’t do X because Trump will exploit it to rile up his supporters" are off-base, because that's going to happen anyway?
Absolutely. In fact, in the district-level analysis of the voter file in California and Virginia that I'll be releasing after Labor Day, I have competitive districts in those states. The data shows the turnout surge and how much different the composition of the electorate was between 2014 and 2018. I'm also able to show that even in these districts where Democrats ran Blue Dog candidates who were as unobtrusive as possible — with, exactly as you stated, the goal of not riling up Trump voters — the turnout for Republican voters in those districts was huge.
In fact, not only did Democrats not get the benefit of not stirring up the Trump base — the Trump base was stirred up and showed up in huge numbers — but by not tapping into anti-Trump sentiment in their own campaign strategy, by not intentionally activating that Trump angst, they paid a price in terms of their own base turnout. It was depressed, compared to other districts.
Expect very high turnout from the Republicans and Republican-leaning folk, no matter who the Democratic candidate is, in short, just like in 2018. Going out of the way to try to avoid riling up those who are already riled up or will be riled up at the drop of a hat is not optimal strategy.
Yep. You're either 100% completely "Causiest of the cause" on your side or your some wishy-washy both sides are equal middle of the roader. Yep.
I want Trump stopped more then I care about the Democrat Party's ego. Crucify me.
Most Democrats do want Trump stopped as a very high priority. Not all Democrats are sold on arguments that seem to pretty clearly be based on demonstrably faulty claims.
Also, separately, looks like Inslee's dropping out.
Last edited: