Merged The Qur'an corrects the mistakes of the false Injil/Torah

Status
Not open for further replies.
[Quran 39.5] [Allah] Created the heavens and the Earth in truth. He overlaps [Yukawer in Arabic يُكَوِّرُ] the night over the day and overlaps [Yukawer يُكَوِّرُ] the day over the night, and enslaved the sun and the moon. ALL MOVE (Kullon Yajree كل يجري) to a prerecorded destiny. Is He not the Exalted, the Forgiver?

http://www.miracles-of-quran.com/earth.htm

Hey, doesn't that verse prove that the Quran's god, Allah, is weak? He can enslave the Sun and Moon, but not the Earth?

Hey, doesn't that verse prove that the Quran is wrong? It mentions that all move, but doesn't mention that the Earth moves.
 
I have hadith enough!

Yes, I've had enough of "My holy book is the true revelation from God, and yours is not." These claims are maintained by poor reading comprehension and a persistent belief that religion is more important that human life and sanity.
 
"Reap what you sow?

Contradiction; Some sow wheat but reap thorns. (Jeremiah 12:13) Vs Some sow but will not reap anything. (Micah 6:15) Vs Some reap without sowing. (Matthew 25:26, Luke 19:22) Vs A man reaps what he sows. (2 Corinthians 9:6, Galatians 6:7)

Excuse; The first are materialistic sowing, thus uneven, the last is afterlife spiritual sowing, thus even.

Rebuttal: This would be acceptable albeit for the passage stating that the righteous reap what they sow in this life, hence materialistic terms;

“Behold, the righteous shall be recompensed in the earth: much more the wicked and the sinner.” (Proverbs 11:31) because (Matthew 25:26, Luke 19:22) speaks of the wicked materialistically getting more than the righteous.

Therefore, even if it is in materialistic terms, it is in contradiction to (Proverbs 11:31)

Correction: The Quran is very clear that humans get what they deserve. In an accountable fashion, God is Fair and Bountiful. People are punished for the bad and greatly rewarded for the good:

“Surely Allah does not do injustice to the weight of an atom, and if it is a good deed He multiplies it and gives from Himself a great reward.” (Quran 4:40)"

http://islamicbook.com/free/200-ways-the-quran-corrects-the-bible/
 
No. To this audience they are all equally superstitious. And no one cares to hear you evangelize your peculiar brand of Islam. You aren't intellectually capable of actually discussing these issues in a comparative religion sort of way, which is the only real interest this forum has.



And if you knew anything about early Christian scripture, you'd know there is a lot of apocryphal stuff that Christians rightly reject as, well, apocryphal. Stop getting your information about other religions from click bait.

As I understand it, when Christianity was still an illegal, suppressed religion in the Roman empire, there were hundreds of sects of Christianity, each with their own scripture, including their own gospels. Then the emperor Constantine was converted to one of those sects, which became the established religion of the Roman empire and was the direct ancestor of the Eastern Orhodox and Roman Catholic denominations of Christianity, and, indirectly, most other modern denominations of Christianity. I had never before heard of this particular gospel, but there are many others, such as the Gospel according to Thomas, and, IIRC, one purportedly by Mary Magdalene.
 
Unless you got something written by God within the last year or so, I have to assume it is no longer current and should therefore be disregarded.
Let me know when The Lord releases an official update.
 
Snipped propaganda

As you know, the only true holy book we have is the Qur'an.[/B]

Snipped more propaganda

.

A book of fairy tales is a book of fairy tales.

Glomming on to one particular fairy tale doesn't make it true.

Asserting that your fairy tale is better than the other guys fairy tale isn't worth much
 
As I understand it, when Christianity was still an illegal, suppressed religion in the Roman empire, there were hundreds of sects of Christianity, each with their own scripture, including their own gospels.

Yes, but it's even more nebulous than that. It wasn't clear early on that Christianity needed a canon. It wasn't clear that the letters being circulated by Paul et al. should play that role. The gospels, of course, came much later than the epistles, and the epistles came much later than the word of mouth. You're quite correct in noting that the decision to canonize certain works is most traceable to Constantine.

Emre is trying to cram Christianity in the canonical and exegetical pattern of Islam, following the notion of inherent, ab initio canon and then relevant commentaries and exegeses. Christians today don't consider the apocryphal (small a) works to be hadith or commentary. They don't consider them at all.
 
<Spam Snipped>

Oh look, more spam.

Emre_1974tr, you really should try reading the Koran yourself:

2:6 As for the Disbelievers, Whether thou warn them or thou warn them not it is all one for them; they believe not.
2:7 Allah hath sealed their hearing and their hearts, and on their eyes there is a covering. Theirs will be an awful doom.

Why are you posting here again?
 
Last edited:
The Koran claims bees eat fruit to make honey and that the resulting honey "is healing for mankind"

16:68 And thy Lord inspired the bee, saying: Choose thou habitations in the hills and in the trees and in that which they thatch;
16:69 Then eat of all fruits, and follow the ways of thy Lord, made smooth (for thee). There cometh forth from their bellies a drink divers of hues, wherein is healing for mankind. Lo! herein is indeed a portent for people who reflect.
 
All pagans think they're monotheistic. The demon's trap is always the same:

Hindus "333 in 1."

Christians "3 in 1".

Pantheists "everything in 1"

New Agers "we are in 1"
 
All pagans think they're monotheistic.

No. You don't understand what "pagain" means. To you it's just an insult. To everyone else it means a specific thing that has nothing to do with what you're trying to foist.

Further, you seem to have no interest in actually discussing the points you bring up. You're just spam at this point. Noise. You have no clue what other religions believe or do, and you're just evangelizing your particular form of Islam with your fingers stuck in your ears. Can you justify why you deserve any further attention from anyone on this forum?
 
The Qur'an says that people will believe always make up partners.

12:106 Most of them will not acknowledge God without setting up partners.

16:3 He has created the heavens and the earth with the truth. Be He exalted above the partners they set up.

40:73 Then it will be said to them: "Where are those that you have set up as partners"
 
The Qur'an says that people will believe always make up partners.

12:106 Most of them will not acknowledge God without setting up partners.

16:3 He has created the heavens and the earth with the truth. Be He exalted above the partners they set up.

40:73 Then it will be said to them: "Where are those that you have set up as partners"

Muhammad had fleas in his beard.
 
All pagans think they're monotheistic.

That is a bald faced lie. You are lying about other religions.

Y3y1QL5.gif
 
No. You don't understand what "pagain" means. To you it's just an insult. To everyone else it means a specific thing that has nothing to do with what you're trying to foist.

Further, you seem to have no interest in actually discussing the points you bring up. You're just spam at this point. Noise. You have no clue what other religions believe or do, and you're just evangelizing your particular form of Islam with your fingers stuck in your ears. Can you justify why you deserve any further attention from anyone on this forum?

I saw this image and it reminded me of Emre_1974tr's lies and fabrications about other religions.

zHsWkZC.jpg
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom