• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Anti-Muslim Terrorist Attack in... NZ?

Darat said:
Evidence?
Click to expand...

By definition

facts, information, and skills acquired by a person through experience or education; the theoretical or practical understanding of a subject.

If a fact is a acquired without a reason for acquiring, it is still knowledge.
 
William Parcher said:
This is the woman I described in post #1089. She wasn't returning to the mosque to check on her husband. She was escaping the grounds but didn't make it.

Another false story is now very common and a mural has been painted to honor a man. He is described variously as tackling or attempting to tackle or take the gun of the shooter during the massacre at Al Noor. In actuality, he tried to run down a hallway (his only escape path) without the shooter seeing him. It was necessary to run near the shooter to get to the hallway and he chose to do it while the shooter was looking away. But he must have been heard because the killer turns and shoots him just as he begins his run down that hallway. This is the only person to move towards the shooter. The stories say he tried to tackle but instead he was trying to get out.
Click to expand...

How do you know this?
 
BobTheCoward said:
By definition



facts, information, and skills acquired by a person through experience or education; the theoretical or practical understanding of a subject.



If a fact is a acquired without a reason for acquiring, it is still knowledge.
Click to expand...
No that does not provide evidence of your claim.
 
BobTheCoward said:
Because some people might find entertainment from it is not reason to hide something from the sum total of available knowledge.
Click to expand...

I'd guess that once you eliminate the deviants who use it for laughs, and the scumbags who use it to prove the Zionists faked the attack to steal America's guns, you're left with a microscopic group way too small to "advance knowledge" in any meaningful way.
 
trustbutverify said:
I'd guess that once you eliminate the deviants who use it for laughs, and the scumbags who use it to prove the Zionists faked the attack to steal America's guns, you're left with a microscopic group way too small to "advance knowledge" in any meaningful way.
Click to expand...

Why does it have to be meaningful?
 
Samson said:
I may be out of touch as self employed, but I think it is a disgrace that summary firings are happening. A more obvious time for less speed and a general anmesty as people process the hazards of voyeurism under scrutiny of morally superior beings I haven't seen since 9/11.
Click to expand...

No, that won't wash. Just about every workplace has extremely strict rules about use of company computers.

Information Analyst said:
Rainbow Warrior?
Click to expand...

Just a quick note on NZ & terrorism: while the Rainbow Warrior is well known, it's not widely known - or been mentioned anywhere I've yet seen or heard - we have had one prior domestic terrorist act.

In 1984, someone planted a bomb at Trades Hall in Wellington. Whatever the intention was, it was thwarted by exploding when only the caretaker, Ernie Abbott, was in the building, killing him.

The killer has never been found and it's one of our enduring mysteries as to who did it and why.

http://www.stuff.co.nz/good-reads/9872178/Wellingtons-unsolved-Trades-Hall-mystery
 
Right, the mystery of the 18 year old and his charges are becoming a little clearer. He is charged with distributing copies on the Friday, but details of another charge have been released:

The other charge alleges an offence between March 8 and March 15, under the same Act, by making an objectionable publication showing a photograph of the mosque in Deans Avenue with the message "Target Acquired" and further chat messaging around inciting extreme violence.
Click to expand...

That tends to indicate he was in contact with Tarrant and exhorted him to do it. He may well have been responsible for that specific mosque being attacked first.

I think maybe he will also require protective custody and can expect to be in jail for a very long time if he is deemed any kind of accessory.
 
BobTheCoward said:
What right are you thinking of?
Click to expand...

The right, for example, of families not to have the brutal slaughter of their loved ones turned into a public snuff film for Nazis and imbeciles.

And for another example, you may feel an involuntary video of your female neighbor undressing must be released to the public so that knowledge may advance, but I'd say that "advancement" must be weighed against her right to privacy... among other things.
 
One final point at this stage - I've seen lots of commentaries and editorials saying we're all to blame for the tragedy. Our way of life, casual racism, promotion of anti-immigration rhetoric and failing to smack racists in the mouth means we are all responsible for allowing this crime to happen.

I'm ok with that.

But on the flip side of the coin, wouldn't that mean that all muslims should take responsibility for muslim terrorists?

Life ain't a one-way street.

As my good pal Jesus used to say: "As ye sow, so shall ye reap".
 
The Atheist said:
Right, the mystery of the 18 year old and his charges are becoming a little clearer. He is charged with distributing copies on the Friday, but details of another charge have been released:



That tends to indicate he was in contact with Tarrant and exhorted him to do it. He may well have been responsible for that specific mosque being attacked first.

I think maybe he will also require protective custody and can expect to be in jail for a very long time if he is deemed any kind of accessory.
Click to expand...

Seems like he was arrested on what they immediately had so they could hold him during investigation for the more serious charges. If so, good police work.
 
trustbutverify said:
The right, for example, of families not to have the brutal slaughter of their loved ones turned into a public snuff film for Nazis and imbeciles.

And for another example, you may feel an involuntary video of your female neighbor undressing must be released to the public so that knowledge may advance, but I'd say that "advancement" must be weighed against her right to privacy... among other things.
Click to expand...

Not rights
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom