Trans Women are not Women

Status
Not open for further replies.
Let everyone compete. Women are practically gone from all level competition. Sports are sexist.

Split into male and female categories based on physical sex. Sports are transphobic.

Split into male and female categories based on identified gender. Trans athletes dominate female competition, practically non-existent from male competition. Sports are now both sexist and transphobic.

Everybody: "We totally understand that you can't please everybody."
Also everybody: "OMG I can't believe I'm not the one you decided to not please."

Can't win, can't lose, can't quit the game.

Quit the game is probably the actual solution.
 
Maybe you give up your right to play in mens or womens leagues when you massively mess with your body? I mean that's already the case if you do it with drugs that enhance performance. If there was some kind of "robot muscle" you could have implanted would they allow that in weight lifting?

Ultimately the categories of sport competition are already arbitrary and meant to try and make it fair. Letting people who were born men play as women doesn't seem fair, at least in a lot of cases.
 
If there was some kind of "robot muscle" you could have implanted would they allow that in weight lifting?

It doesn't require implants, but certain powerlifting federations allow the use of specialized elastic clothing which provides mechanical assistance to the lifter. Permissible equipment is often specified exactly (as in a list of specific brand and models is approved, nothing else is) in order to keep things fair between competitors.

https://barbend.com/raw-vs-equipped-powerlifting/
 
Maybe you give up your right to play in mens or womens leagues when you massively mess with your body? I mean that's already the case if you do it with drugs that enhance performance. If there was some kind of "robot muscle" you could have implanted would they allow that in weight lifting?

Ultimately the categories of sport competition are already arbitrary and meant to try and make it fair. Letting people who were born men play as women doesn't seem fair, at least in a lot of cases.

^^

This

There are sacrifices all the time, everyone has to make when they make decisions, and while I am perfectly aware that there is already pressures on people who chose to transgender that are large, frankly tough tits (pardon the pun), just add if you do it, you can't play elite womens sport.
 
^^

This

There are sacrifices all the time, everyone has to make when they make decisions, and while I am perfectly aware that there is already pressures on people who chose to transgender that are large, frankly tough tits (pardon the pun), just add if you do it, you can't play elite womens sport.

Problem is, by some definitions, they are women, so excluding them created some issues.

Course, the issue could be those definitions.
 
That's the paradox that no one is addressing.

"You don't count / you belong to a third category" isn't going to work when literally trying to gain... errr access (not the exact word, but close) to an established group is THE ENTIRE POINT.

If trans-women were happy being women some of the time or happy being a new third category or sub-category we WOULDN'T BE HAVING THIS DISCUSSION.

There's women/men doing it, we want to be involved in that in the way we define ourselves isn't a side issue, it's the issue.
 
Problem is, by some definitions, they are women, so excluding them created some issues.

Course, the issue could be those definitions.

And to those who think they are women, they just need to comprehend they are performanced enhanced women, just like any other hormone influenced female athlete
 
Problem is, by some definitions, they are women, so excluding them created some issues.

Course, the issue could be those definitions.

That's the paradox that no one is addressing.

"You don't count / you belong to a third category" isn't going to work when literally trying to gain... errr access (not the exact word, but close) to an established group is THE ENTIRE POINT.

If trans-women were happy being women some of the time or happy being a new third category or sub-category we WOULDN'T BE HAVING THIS DISCUSSION.


That is not, actually, universal. In point of fact, quite a number of us are perfectly happy to be a "third gender". Of course, most of us also have no interest whatsoever in competitive sports, particularly on a professional level.
 
Not sure it'd have the numbers for healthy competitions, mind you.


Which is something I really don't give a rat's about, personally. But I don't see why skill classes can't be used, the way that they already are for some sports.
 
Which is something I really don't give a rat's about, personally.

Nor I, but obviously a number of people care. Smaller categories make it harder to get some really good crop.

But I don't see why skill classes can't be used, the way that they already are for some sports.

As stated numerous times before, because women would consistently rank lower than men. The entire reason why they have their own categories is to avoid that.
 
At a certain point this is gonna turn into me being the Universal Champion of the 1st Annual Male 39-40 Year Old Veteran Atheist Who Drives a Dodge and has a Chihuahua named Martini Games.
 
At a certain point this is gonna turn into me being the Universal Champion of the 1st Annual Male 39-40 Year Old Veteran Atheist Who Drives a Dodge and has a Chihuahua named Martini Games.

Would you let the Male 39-40 Year Old Veteran Atheist Who Drives a Dodge and has a Chihuahua named Gimlet compete? Could he rename his dog, or would the dog's prior name still give him an unfair competitive advantage?
 
Would you let the Male 39-40 Year Old Veteran Atheist Who Drives a Dodge and has a Chihuahua named Gimlet compete? Could he rename his dog, or would the dog's prior name still give him an unfair competitive advantage?

A better comparison would be would you let a male 39-40 Year Old Veteran Atheist Who Drives a Dodge and has a Mastiff/Rottweiler cross that now self identifies as a Chihuahua named Martini compete.
 
Sounds great. I'll make sure I bring my emotional support flamethrower when I go along to watch.
 
As stated numerous times before, because women would consistently rank lower than men. The entire reason why they have their own categories is to avoid that.


That doesn't follow. Rank lower in what? The entire point of having skill categories is to have separate rankings. That's why boxing has a welterweight champion alongside a heavyweight champion. Does that mean a welterweight champion is ranked lower than a heavyweight champion, and the category should therefore be avoided?
 
That doesn't follow. Rank lower in what? The entire point of having skill categories is to have separate rankings. That's why boxing has a welterweight champion alongside a heavyweight champion. Does that mean a welterweight champion is ranked lower than a heavyweight champion, and the category should therefore be avoided?

Rank lower in performance, I would imagine

Boxing is not a very good comparison as the weight classes are just as much about safety
 
Last edited:
Rank lower in performance, I would imagine

Boxing is not a very good comparison as the weight classes are just as much about safety


So are many other weight and skill classes. Although I have a very hard time believing that given the prevalence of traumatic brain injury in the sport.

But there are plenty of others which are about skill. Minor/Major League Baseball, for example.

But I guess it doesn't do much good for male egos to have to compete with women, or worse yet tranny perverts, who might actually be better than they are.
 
That doesn't follow. Rank lower in what? The entire point of having skill categories is to have separate rankings. That's why boxing has a welterweight champion alongside a heavyweight champion. Does that mean a welterweight champion is ranked lower than a heavyweight champion, and the category should therefore be avoided?

Pound for pound, men outperform women in feats of strength. Co-ed weight classes in boxing would see men dominate boxing in every single weight class, followed by transwomen. Women would be effectively shut out out of the upper and middle levels of professional boxing.

Not that there's much interest in women's professional boxing, I think. But at least there women are testing themselves against other people with the same average strength to weight ratio.
 
But there are plenty of others which are about skill. Minor/Major League Baseball, for example.

Given a male pitcher and a female pitcher of equal skill, the male will on average dominate, because of his greater strength. His fastball will be faster than hers. He'll have greater stamina, which means he'll be able to pitch more innings, which a huge part of the strategic economy of baseball. And as the game goes on, his greater stamina means that as fatigue starts to set in, his pitches will still have more control than hers.

A female pitcher would need to develop above-average skills, just to compete with average male pitchers. And this is true across the board, in any contest where strength or stamina plays a part.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom