• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Cont: Brilliant Light Power Going To Market - Free Energy Generator Part 3

Status
Not open for further replies.
halleyscomet said:
Amen. I suspected I'd touch a nerve by mentioning obvious BS like the flat Earthers and the anti-vax nutters. I'm not surprised he also swallows the long-debunked claims of a vaccine / autism connection.
Click to expand...

I can look at Markie's hydrino nonsense with a bit of humor since I assume that the only victims of the hoax are people with more money than sense. But, spreading anti-vaxx nonsense threatens the health and lives of people - especially people who are the most vulnerable such as those who can't be vaccinated because of compromised immune systems or other issues.
 
Last edited:
HydrinoVax™ will fix all that, though.

Mills perfected it years ago. He's just waiting to release it until the painless injection syringe he's also developing is ready for market.
 
Myriad said:
HydrinoVax™ will fix all that, though.

Mills perfected it years ago. He's just waiting to release it until the painless injection syringe he's also developing is ready for market.
Click to expand...
Mills was smart getting out of the scam-medical business when he did as he probably knew too well (being a doctor and all) about how much scrutiny he'd undergo by the medical establishment which he wouldn't get with his overunity device.

But, knowing now that markie is an anti-vaxxer, I bet that even if Mills himself came out and said he was wrong about hydrinos, markie would carry the hydrino torch until the end of time.
 
halleyscomet said:
Citation needed.

Seriously, back that claim up.

And I mean back it up with evidence, not a podcast.
Click to expand...

Why don't you ask the CDC? Ask them why they don't do a study comparing a large group vaccinated children to totally unvaccinated children. Instead what do we get? Comparison of a vaccinated group against an 'unvaccinated' group, except that they really aren't unvaccinated ; it's only the MMR vaccine they haven't received. And those results show no significant difference. Except if they are black American children. Oh yes, in that case the CDC decided not to publish that result, and Dr. Thompson, the whistleblower from the CDC, had to leak that information out.

So. Because the CDC or another group doesn't do a study comparing truly unvaccinated children against vaccinated, people like Dr. Paul Thomas have to do that kind of work based on data from their own practice. Listen for about 5 minutes of the podcast starting at the 31 minute mark to see the results in his practice of greatly diminishing or altogether stopping the vaccines for young children, according to parent wishes.

To the rest: Calling me an anti vaxer only reveals your desperation. Vaccination that is safe is quite worthwhile, thank you very much. The problem is that vaccination as currently administered is not demonstrated to be safe. It should be seen as remarkable by skeptics that a study comparing totally unvaccinated kids to vaccinated kids is absent. Think about it.
 
markie said:
I'm really referring to human nature within the intellectual institutions where findings such as Mills' discoveries can be reasonably expected to be properly accessed. There is something about the dynamic of human nature within an institutional setting that can lead to dysfunctions that would not normally occur.
Some might call it a failure of the institutions, but it is both.

But regarding 'populist' opinions ; flat earth popularity reveals failures in our educational institutions among other things. Conspiracies do exist, just not flat earth ones. Vaccines? Why call it an anti-vax movement when probably most within the movement like the idea of vaccines when they are proven to be safe. I've seen no such study for their safety, in the way they are actually administered. I'm not talking about safety for individual vaccines but safety of vaccines when multiple vaccines are administered at once.
Given the whistle blowers at CDC and near zero autism rates among children of paediatric doctors who don't vaccinate in the conventional way, yeah, we should be alarmed and fighting for answers in the present autism epidemic.

https://soundcloud.com/user-507883655/6-dr-paul-thomas-interview-how-to-end-the-autism-epidemic
Click to expand...

Nice. So we can now lump Mills in with The Bastard Wakefield. I'm okay with that.
 
Please take the vaccination woo to another thread. It's bad enough that this thread contains pseudo-science without it being derailed by dangerous nonsense.
 
Last edited:
Worm said:
Please take the vaccination woo to another thread. It's bad enough that this tread contains pseudo-science without it being derailed by dangerous nonsense.
Click to expand...

Agreed. Consistent derailment seems to be the main tactic to distract from the absolute failure of BLP to produce anything
 
markie said:
Why don't you ask the CDC? Ask them why they don't do a study comparing a large group vaccinated children to totally unvaccinated children. Instead what do we get? Comparison of a vaccinated group against an 'unvaccinated' group, except that they really aren't unvaccinated ; it's only the MMR vaccine they haven't received. And those results show no significant difference. Except if they are black American children. Oh yes, in that case the CDC decided not to publish that result, and Dr. Thompson, the whistleblower from the CDC, had to leak that information out.



So. Because the CDC or another group doesn't do a study comparing truly unvaccinated children against vaccinated, people like Dr. Paul Thomas have to do that kind of work based on data from their own practice. Listen for about 5 minutes of the podcast starting at the 31 minute mark to see the results in his practice of greatly diminishing or altogether stopping the vaccines for young children, according to parent wishes.



To the rest: Calling me an anti vaxer only reveals your desperation. Vaccination that is safe is quite worthwhile, thank you very much. The problem is that vaccination as currently administered is not demonstrated to be safe. It should be seen as remarkable by skeptics that a study comparing totally unvaccinated kids to vaccinated kids is absent. Think about it.
Click to expand...




Ah, then you concede you have no evidence to back up your claims, just bluster and urban legends. I’m not going on a wild goose chase to hunt up evidence of YOUR lies about an Autism / Vaccine connection. I know it’s a wild goose chase because I DID that research when my first child was born, back before that scumbag Wakefield had been exposed as a fraud who faked his “study.” Hell, I even had my firstborn on the Sears alternative vaccine schedule for a couple of years.

You’re the one repeating a debunked chestnut about a vaccine / autism connection. Either admit you’ve got zip to support it or present your evidence.
 
Anyways, it is nearly the end of February 2019, what is your next 'this time for real' deadline Markie?
2029 in the hope everyone has forgotten the previous 'almost done now, please send more money' promises made for the past 30 ish years?
 
halleyscomet said:
Ah, then you concede you have no evidence to back up your claims, just bluster and urban legends. I’m not going on a wild goose chase to hunt up evidence of YOUR lies about an Autism / Vaccine connection. I know it’s a wild goose chase because I DID that research when my first child was born, back before that scumbag Wakefield had been exposed as a fraud who faked his “study.” Hell, I even had my firstborn on the Sears alternative vaccine schedule for a couple of years.

You’re the one repeating a debunked chestnut about a vaccine / autism connection. Either admit you’ve got zip to support it or present your evidence.
Click to expand...

Please, "scumbag" is too kind. In the future, I ask you that you use his proper title, The Bastard Wakefield.
 
Mike! said:
Please, "scumbag" is too kind. In the future, I ask you that you use his proper title, The Bastard Wakefield.
Click to expand...



That’s not the best term for him but most the words I’d need to describe him accurately aren’t allowed on this forum.
 
halleyscomet said:
That’s not the best term for him but most the words I’d need to describe him accurately aren’t allowed on this forum.
Click to expand...

That's why I settled on The Bastard Wakefield. It drives the point home more effectively than The ************* ******* Wakefield that most forum software would display. :thumbsup:;)
 
Hellbound said:
I've stated this before, but perhaps it's time again. I've always compared scientific method to vehicle crash testing. The goal isn't to ram your car (theory) into soft piles of pillows and strands of rubber bands to make sure it doesn't get hurt. The idea is to slam it head-on into the brick wall of existing knowledge at high speed, and see what breaks. If your theory is correct, what breaks will be the wall.

All the excuses, the made-up explanations, the just-so stories, the bad and incomplete data, the equations that don't give correct answers, the refusal to get truly independent testing or to release the data that would allow such; these are all piles of pillows. It can only lead one to question why he claims a 5-star crash rating when his theory has never hit anything more rigid than warm jello.
Click to expand...

Nice post!

Truth produces its own conviction, because the more you test something that is true, the more evidence you produce for its veracity.

A real scientist at BLP would take the claims of hydrino analysis, and energy production, and come up with an iron-clad experiment that could be reproduced by the world to prove the claims. Scientists are laser-focused on getting this type of recognition and evidence. Hydrinos would result in a Nobel Prize. Do you really think a scientist wouldn't exhaust every way to test the claims false, or find evidence to prove them true?

This tells me that there are no real scientists at BLP. Those with scientific training likely either suspect fraud and don't care, are incompetent (that covers true-believers), or are in on the scheme.

This is not how either science, or product development it done.
 
Last edited:
LTC8K6 said:
The NDA probably does not allow that discussion.
Click to expand...

Shame too.

Still, since he's here defending Mills so vigorously some disclosure would seem to be appropriate.

I figured he'd ignore the the post since transparency/honesty and Mills seems to be mutually exclusive.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom