Mueller Investigation pt5

Status
Not open for further replies.
CapelDodger said:
There's that, and the fact that McCabe's report of hearing that cabinet members were discussing the option (McCabe was not a cabinet member, of course) has resulted in him being presented as party to a conspiracy by cabinet members (amongst whom McCabe did not number) to replace an incompetent Presdent by Constitutional means.

The Big Dog can, according to the Big Dog hisself, expertly explain how that works. Or he could tell us how Trump gets there, which is an even greater challenge.
Click to expand...

Sure, McCabe was lying.
 
Delphic Oracle said:
I still can't wrap my head around how a legal avenue specifically created for removing the executive can be referred to as "illegal" or a "coup."
Click to expand...

Just hit yourself in the head with a hammer and then watch 1,000 hours of Fox and it'll make perfect sense!
 
The Big Dog said:
Sure, McCabe was lying.
Click to expand...
About what?


Was McCabe lying about hearing that cabinet members (the people with the power, in this case) were discussing the removal of President Trump on the grounds of incompetence? If so, where's the evidence that a coup was being planned, as Trump insists it was? Is Trump lying? Are you lying? Is God messing with your mind? Who's with your wife right now? Better pray it's not your father-in-law, because what a scandal that would be.



For your own safety, I think it's best you just convey to us what Trump has explained to you.
 
WilliamSeger said:
Excuse me, professor, but you forgot to tell us what McCabe lying about, and how that explains what you were asked to explain?
Click to expand...

Where to start?

Literally everything, from Page’s role, to the warrants, to why he sat on the emails, to why he leaked information to when he lied about it, to why he got fired, to people offering to wear a wire.

****, it would be easier to say what he has not lied bout.
 
The Big Dog said:
Where to start?

Literally everything, from Page’s role, to the warrants, to why he sat on the emails, to why he leaked information to when he lied about it, to why he got fired, to people offering to wear a wire.

****, it would be easier to say what he has not lied bout.
Click to expand...


Can someone say BULL? More assertions pulled out of an ass. Man, it stinks in here. What is it about conservatives today? Projection and out an out fabrications. I guess they watch Donnie do it, so they figure they can too?
 
Last edited:
The Big Dog said:
Where to start?

Literally everything, from Page’s role, to the warrants, to why he sat on the emails, to why he leaked information to when he lied about it, to why he got fired, to people offering to wear a wire.

****, it would be easier to say what he has not lied bout.
Click to expand...

Well, sorry, but you certainly haven't impressed me with your instinctive ability to detect liars, and you certainly haven't explained the idiotic "25th Amendment coup" conspiracy theory.
 
The Big Dog said:
Where to start?

Literally everything, from Page’s role, to the warrants, to why he sat on the emails, to why he leaked information to when he lied about it, to why he got fired, to people offering to wear a wire.

****, it would be easier to say what he has not lied bout.
Click to expand...

Where is the evidence he lied about rosenstein offering to wear a recording device?
 
Threatening any judge is an act of pure stupidity; threatening the judge who is hearing your case? I mean, what the actual **** was Roger Stone thinking?
 
smartcooky said:
Threatening any judge is an act of pure stupidity; threatening the judge who is hearing your case? I mean, what the actual **** was Roger Stone thinking?
Click to expand...

He thinks he's untouchable - which, given his history, seems to be a sentiment supported by empirical data.
 
smartcooky said:
Threatening any judge is an act of pure stupidity; threatening the judge who is hearing your case? I mean, what the actual **** was Roger Stone thinking?
Click to expand...
Is he actually TRYING to get a conviction? :boggled: What would be the advantage of that? Some assurance of protection against "accidents" before his trial? (Not that it would help that...) To ingratiate himself to earn a presidential pardon??
 
https://twitter.com/kathrynw5/status/1097593941795500032

Roger Stone texts me this in response to my inquiry about his Instagram post of Judge Amy Berman Jackson that featured crosshairs in the background:
Click to expand...

Quote embedded in tweet. Essentially "it wasn't a threat, but people are misinterpreting it as such so even though it's 100% factual I'm taking it down". There are a couple of follow-ups in the subsequent tweets.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom